journal article·2026-04-16Open access

Rapid AI-Assisted Instructional Design: Using Agentic LLM Tools to Develop UDL-Aligned Curricula for Student Veterans and Multilingual Learners

John C. Chick, Laura T. Morello

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

Background/Context: Creating instructional materials that authentically meet the needs of marginalized learner groups such as student veterans, multilingual adult learners, and first-generation doctoral students demands consistent application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles coupled with meaningful content expertise about those learners’ traits, access needs, and lived experiences. Faculty at teaching-intensive institutions face persistent constraints of time, knowledge, and course load that make systematic UDL implementation difficult. Objective: This practitioner-scholar case study examines whether HAIST-structured agentic LLM-assisted instructional design can produce UDL-aligned materials for student veterans and multilingual learners at a quality level and time frame realistic for under-resourced faculty. Methodology: Drawing from the Human-AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST) and UDL guidelines, we document four AI-assisted cycles of instructional design at a Hispanic-Serving Institution. Outcomes related to UDL alignment were measured using a rubric adapted from CAST Guidelines 2.2. Results: Across four materials, initial AI generation averaged 61.4% UDL alignment (SD = 8.7%); following iterative calibration, this rose to 84.2% (SD = 5.3%). The largest gains occurred in the Engagement category. Conclusions: These descriptive findings, interpreted as exploratory rather than inferential given the single-site case study design and n = 4 materials, suggest that HAIST-structured AI-assisted design has the potential to produce accessible materials for underserved learner populations in time frames feasible for working faculty. Learner outcome data were not collected in this study; future quasi-experimental work is needed to assess the effectiveness of these materials with target learner populations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Educational Leadership, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT 06604, USA

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. CAST (2025, February 03). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2. Available online: http://udlguidelines.cast.org.
2. Chick, J.C. (2024). Perceived Enablers and Barriers of Student Veterans in Higher Education and the Effectiveness of UDL Strategies, American Association for Adult and Continuing Education. American Association for Adult and Continuing Education (AAACE) Conference Proceedings.
3. Coming home: Student veterans’ articulation of college re-enrollment
4. Cummins, J. (2014). To what extent are Canadian second language policies evidence-based? Reflections on the intersections of research and policy. Front. Psychol., 5.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00358 ↗
5. Morello, L.T., and Chick, J.C. (2025). Human-AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST): Development, Multi-Framework Assessment, and AI-Assisted Validation in Academic Research. Informatics, 12.10.3390/informatics12030085 ↗
6. Meyer, A., Rose, D.H., and Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice, CAST Professional Publishing.
7. The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 201610.1080/13603116.2017.1325074 ↗
8. Measuring the effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning intervention in postsecondary education
9. A review of research on universal design educational models10.1177/0741932513518980 ↗
10. Universal design for learning: Meeting the needs of all students10.1044/leader.FTR2.16102011.14 ↗
11. Student veterans in higher education
12. English language learners’ access to and attainment in postsecondary education10.1002/tesq.49 ↗
13. The faculty perspective on Universal Design for Learning
14. Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems10.1038/s41562-016-0028 ↗
15. Student perceptions of faculty implementation of Universal Design for Learning
16. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators?10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 ↗
17. Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 ↗
18. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 ↗
19. Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education10.14742/ajet.8695 ↗
20. Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, ACM.10.1145/3442188.3445922 ↗
21. Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York University Press.
22. Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118 ↗
23. Branch, R.M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6 ↗
24. Merriam, S.B., and Tisdell, E.J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, Jossey-Bass. [4th ed.].
25. 2018 Adult learners’ perspectives on their engagement in a hybrid learning postgraduate programme10.1080/07377363.2018.1469071 ↗
26. Challenges faced by adult learners in online distance education: A literature review10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.929 ↗
27. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].
28. Using thematic analysis in psychology10.1191/1478088706qp063oa ↗
29. Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5 ↗