journal article·2026-04-14Open access

Novel Analysis of Game Performance in Badminton: A Hierarchical Comparative Framework Between BWF Top-Ranking Players and Regional University League Players

Naoki Hayashi, Shota Suda, Jo Kato, Ryoichi Nagatomi, Yosuke Yamada

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

This study aimed to identify structural differences in shot characteristics between world-class badminton players and regional collegiate players using a hierarchical comparative framework. Match data were collected from top-ranking players in the Badminton World Federation (BWF) World Series and from regional university league players. All shots were recorded using a custom VBA-based notational analysis system, including player identity, court position, shot type, and rally outcome. Statistical analyses were conducted using chi-square tests with residual analysis and logistic regression modeling incorporating competitive level and tactical patterns. The results revealed that BWF players exhibited significantly lower error rates and higher proportions of building shots, indicating superior rally stability and tactical consistency. In contrast, collegiate players demonstrated higher variability in performance, including both higher ace rates and error rates. These findings suggest that world-class performance is characterized by the ability to sustain rallies while minimizing errors, rather than relying solely on offensive success. Although effect sizes were relatively small and the predictive performance of the regression model was modest (AUC = 0.53), the analysis successfully captured structural differences in tactical patterns between competitive levels. This supports the value of the model as a tool for understanding game dynamics rather than prediction. From a theoretical perspective, the findings align with the view of sport performance as a dynamic, self-organizing system, where outcomes emerge from interactions between players. Practically, the results suggest that improving defensive stability, reducing errors, and maintaining rally continuity are critical for achieving higher competitive performance. This study demonstrates the usefulness of a hierarchical comparative approach for bridging the gap between domestic and international performance standards and provides a foundation for future data-driven research in badminton.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Analytics and Performance · Sports Performance and Training · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, 3F, Medical School Building 4, 2-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8575, Japan

Faculty of Sports Science, Sendai University, Shibata 989-1693, Japan

School of Marine Science and Technology, Tokai University, Shizuoka 424-8610, Japan

Designing Future Health Initiative Promotion Office of Strategic Innovation, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8576, Japan

Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8576, Japan

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system10.1080/026404102320675620 ↗
2. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis10.1080/026404102320675602 ↗
3. Effects of breathing exercises on young swimmers’ respiratory system parameters and performance10.62617/mcb.v21i1.205 ↗
4. Abe, K., and Watanabe, M. (2005). Coaching Theory of Badminton, Japan Federation of Badminton Coaches. [2nd ed.].
5. Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton10.1136/bjsm.37.1.62 ↗
6. The Science of Badminton: Game Characteristics, Anthropometry, Physiology, Visual Fitness and Biomechanics10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2 ↗
7. Game analysis of women’s singles in the Beijing Olympic badminton tournament from the perspective of game duration, rally duration and stroke count
8. Analysis of badminton matches at the London 2012 Olympic Games
9. Analysis of badminton matches at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games
10. Analysis of badminton matches at the Tokyo 2021 Olympic Games
11. Development and practicality of a badminton game performance analysis system
12. Time analysis of college women’s badminton matches
13. Three-dimensional match analysis of elite badminton players: Frequency of advantage and disadvantage shots
14. Kinematic analysis of smash motion in college and high school badminton players focusing on racket head trajectory and shoulder joint motion
15. Kinetic chain analysis of smash motion in experienced and inexperienced badminton players
16. Krizkova, S., Tomaskova, H., and Tirkolaee, E.B. (2021). Sport Performance Analysis with a Focus on Racket Sports: A Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11199212 ↗
17. Naik, B.T., Hashmi, M.F., and Bokde, N.D. (2022). A Comprehensive Review of Computer Vision in Sports: Open Issues, Future Trends and Research Directions. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094429 ↗
18. Liu, W., Zhu, Y., Guo, W., Wang, X., and Yu, S. (2023). Gaming Tree Based Evaluation Model for Badminton Tactic Benefit Analysis and Prediction. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202305.1741.v1 ↗
19. Changes in the game characteristics of a badminton match: A longitudinal study through the Olympic Game finals analysis in men’s singles
20. Lee, K.T., Xie, W., and Teh, K.C. (2005, January 17–21). Notational analysis of international badminton competitions. Proceedings of the ISBS Conference Proceedings Archive, Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/799.
21. Japan Badminton Association (2024). Badminton Competition Rules 2024–2025, Japan Badminton Association.
22. Galeano, J., Gomez, M., Rivas, F., and Buldu, J.M. (2021). Entropy of Badminton Strike Positions. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23070799 ↗