journal article·2026-04-13Open access

Explainable Machine Learning Reveals Distinct Air Pollution Profiles in Two Geographically Adjacent Cities

Cemal Aktürk

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the fundamental environmental problems that directly threaten public health, ecosystems, and sustainable urban life in regions with high industrialization and urbanization density. This study aims to investigate whether the air pollution dynamics in Gaziantep and Kilis, two neighboring cities in Turkey, exhibit distinctive city-specific characteristics in their time series. In this context, Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance matrix and hierarchical clustering approaches were applied to compare the temporal behavior of pollutants from daily time series of PM10, SO2, CO, and O3 measurements across provinces between 2021 and 2025. Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Support Vector Machines (SVM) models were then developed to examine the separability of cities based solely on pollutant concentrations. The results revealed that the RF and XGBoost models successfully classified the two cities with over 93% accuracy. Additionally, SHAP analysis was used to interpret the contribution of each pollutant within the classification models, indicating that PM10 and SO2 have relatively higher importance in distinguishing between the two cities. It should be noted that SHAP provides model-based interpretability rather than a direct representation of physical or atmospheric mechanisms. The findings suggest that pollutant time series may exhibit statistically distinguishable structures even between neighboring cities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Advanced Technologies in Various Fields

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University, Gaziantep 27000, Türkiye

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0 ↗
2. New WHO global air quality guidelines: More pressure on nations to reduce air pollution levels10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00287-4 ↗
3. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6 ↗
4. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter10.1073/pnas.1803222115 ↗
5. Forbes Türkiye (2025, December 12). Türkiye’de Hava Kirliliğinin Ekonomiye Maliyeti Yılda 138 Milyar Dolar. Available online: https://www.forbes.com.tr/surdurulebilirlik/turkiye-de-hava-kirliliginin-ekonomiye-maliyeti-yilda-138-milyar-dolar.
6. Comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques for the prediction of air pollution: A case study from China10.1007/s44273-023-00005-w ↗
7. Spatial prediction of PM10 concentration using machine learning algorithms in Ankara, Turkey
8. A systematic comparison of different machine learning models for the spatial estimation of air pollution10.1007/s10489-023-05109-y ↗
9. Kujawska, J., Kulisz, M., Oleszczuk, P., and Cel, W. (2022). Machine Learning Methods to Forecast the Concentration of PM10 in Lublin, Poland. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15176428 ↗
10. Spatio-temporal air quality analysis and PM2.5 prediction over Hyderabad City, India using artificial intelligence techniques10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102067 ↗
11. Air-pollution prediction in smart city: Deep learning approach10.1186/s40537-021-00548-1 ↗
12. Air quality prediction using CNN+LSTM-based hybrid deep learning architecture10.1007/s11356-021-16227-w ↗
13. Forecasting PM10 levels in Sri Lanka: A comparative analysis of machine learning models
14. Morapedi, T.D., and Obagbuwa, I.C. (2023). Air pollution particulate matter (PM2.5) prediction in South African cities using machine learning techniques. Front. Artif. Intell., 6.10.3389/frai.2023.1230087 ↗
15. Evaluation of machine learning and deep learning models for daily air quality index prediction in Delhi city, India10.1007/s10661-024-13351-1 ↗
16. Machine learning for air quality index (AQI) forecasting: Shallow learning or deep learning?10.1007/s11356-024-35404-1 ↗
17. A systematic study on PM2.5 and PM10 concentration prediction using machine learning and deep learning model10.1016/j.enceco.2025.07.001 ↗
18. A systematic literature review of deep learning neural network for time series air quality forecasting10.1007/s11356-021-17442-1 ↗
19. A Systematic Review and Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Air Quality Prediction10.1007/s11270-025-08410-3 ↗
20. Prediction of Air Quality Index Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Comparative Analysis10.1155/2023/4916267 ↗
21. Prediction of SO2 and PM10 air pollutants using a deep learning-based recurrent neural network: Case of industrial city Sakarya10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101051 ↗
22. Liang, Y.C., Maimury, Y., Chen, A.H.L., and Juarez, J.R.C. (2020). Machine learning-based prediction of air quality. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10249151 ↗
23. Performance of machine learning models to forecast PM10 levels10.1016/j.mex.2024.102557 ↗
24. Comparative analysis of Air Quality Index prediction using deep learning algorithms10.1007/s41324-023-00541-1 ↗
25. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055 ↗
26. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
27. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
28. Dhaliwal, S.S., Nahid, A.A., and Abbas, R. (2018). Effective intrusion detection system using XGBoost. Information, 9.10.3390/info9070149 ↗
29. Support–vector networks10.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
30. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions