journal article·2023-12-06

Influence of coarse aggregate morphology on the mechanical characteristics of skeleton in porous asphalt concrete

Yang Liu, Zhendong Qian, Dong Zheng

Publisher page

Abstract

The properties of coarse aggregates have a great influence on the mechanical characteristics of porous asphalt concrete (PAC). The objective of this study is to reveal the influence of coarse aggregate morphology on the skeleton mechanical characteristics of PAC-13. To achieve this goal, a microstructure analysis method based on X-ray CT was developed to acquire three-dimensional morphological characteristics of coarse aggregates, and the morphology parameters were proposed. Based on the morphology of the actual aggregate, the coarse aggregate skeleton structure and skeleton penetration test were simulated by the discrete element method (DEM) and the values of skeleton strength under different morphologies were determined. The sensitive influences of coarse aggregate morphology parameters on the skeleton strength were quantified by the GA-BP neural network and the recommended value ranges of morphology parameters were proposed. The results show that the morphology of coarse aggregates within the size range of 4.75∼9.5mm and 9.5∼13.2mm has the greatest influence on the skeleton strength of PAC-13. The composite flat-elongated index and composite texture index of aggregates in 9.5∼13.2mm and 4.75∼9.5mm, and the composite angularity index of aggregates in 4.75∼9.5mm, which are referred to as Icom(9.5∼13.2), Icom(4.75∼9.5), Tcom(9.5∼13.2), Tcom(4.75∼9.5), AIcom(4.75∼9.5), are the high-sensitive influencing factors to the skeleton strength of PAC-13.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Intelligent Transportation System Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China

Nanjing Modern Multimodal Transportation Laboratory, Nanjing, People's Republic of China

Kunshan Urban Management Bureau, Kunshan, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.18910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.189 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000011710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000117 ↗
3. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969524510.1080/14680629.2011.9695245 ↗
4. ASTM, 2010. Standard test method for flat particle, elongated particles, or flat and elongated particles in coarse aggregate – ASTM D4791. West Coshohocken, PA: American Standard for Testing Methods.
5. ASTM, 2014. Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine – ASTM C131. West Coshohocken, PA: American Standard for Testing Methods.
6. ASTM, 2015. Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate – ASTM C127. West Coshohocken, PA: American Standard for Testing Methods.
7. ASTM, 2017. Standard test method for compressive strength of asphalt mixture – ASTM D1074. West Coshohocken, PA: American Standard for Testing Methods.
8. British Standard 1990. Methods for determination of aggregate crushing value (ACV) – BS 812-110.
9. 10.1080/14680629.2016.113888110.1080/14680629.2016.1138881 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.01110.1016/j.sandf.2012.07.011 ↗
11. 10.1080/10298436.2015.102446710.1080/10298436.2015.1024467 ↗
12. 10.1080/10298436.2018.156378510.1080/10298436.2018.1563785 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12681910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126819 ↗
14. 10.1080/10298436.2015.106600610.1080/10298436.2015.1066006 ↗
15. JTJ E40, 2007. Test methods of soils for highway engineering. Beijing: Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000380110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003801 ↗
17. 10.1080/10298436.2023.216565010.1080/10298436.2023.2165650 ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2021.197203310.1080/14680629.2021.1972033 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000419610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004196 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12625610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126256 ↗
21. 10.1080/10298436.2016.117556010.1080/10298436.2016.1175560 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.103 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000060210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000602 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000097510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000975 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.05610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.056 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12426210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124262 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.008 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(789)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(789) ↗
29. 10.1617/s11527-009-9548-110.1617/s11527-009-9548-1 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(498)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(498) ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.10410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.104 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.11610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.116 ↗
33. 10.3141/1891-2110.3141/1891-21 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000187210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001872 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.19910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.199 ↗
36. 10.1007/s12205-019-2112-910.1007/s12205-019-2112-9 ↗
37. 10.1520/JTE2018072310.1520/JTE20180723 ↗
38. 10.1617/s11527-022-01952-610.1617/s11527-022-01952-6 ↗
39. 10.1080/10298436.2015.106598710.1080/10298436.2015.1065987 ↗