Electronic Health Record Systems Based on Blockchain: A Comprehensive Survey
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid growth in the spectrum of cyber threats, coupled with the evolution of digital uses, services and infrastructures in the healthcare sector, means that security measures need to be reassessed to ensure that they are in step with the reality on the ground and adapted accordingly, as smart healthcare systems show a dearth of privacy and security in the digitization and sharing of health records. Blockchain, being a new decentralized infrastructure, is one of the leading revolutionary emerging technologies that can be used to improve data integrity and traceability in healthcare systems. This study investigates how blockchain technology is affecting the healthcare domain, comprehensively analyzing its implications, challenges, and capabilities. The results indicate that blockchain is a revolutionary technology for creating transparent personal health records that can address the limitations of smart healthcare system management and provide a decentralized environment for exchanging healthcare data. However, there are still plenty of difficulties and obstacles that prevent it from being more widely accepted by healthcare stakeholders.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Internet of Things and AI · Organizational and Employee Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ERMIA Team, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, National School of Applied Sciences (ENSA), Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier 90000, Morocco
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. (2023, November 20). Checking-Up on Health: Ransomware Accounts for 54% of Cybersecurity Threats. Available online: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/news/checking-up-on-health-ransomware-accounts-for-54-of-cybersecurity-threats.
2. (2023, November 21). Cyberattacks on the Healthcare Sector. Available online: https://www.checkpoint.com/cyber-hub/cyber-security/what-is-healthcare-cyber-security/cyberattacks-on-the-healthcare-sector/.
3. (2023, November 20). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services—Office for Civil Rights, Available online: https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report.jsf.
4. Alder, S. (2026, February 28). December 2021 Healthcare Data Breach Report. Available online: https://www.hipaajournal.com/december-2021-healthcare-data-breach-report.
5. Alder, S. (2026, February 28). December 2022 Healthcare Data Breach Report. Available online: https://www.hipaajournal.com/december-2022-healthcare-data-breach-report/.
6. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, Bitcoin.
7. Unraveling a Blockchain-Based Framework towards Patient Empowerment: A Scoping Review Envisioning Future Smart Health Technologies10.1016/j.smhl.2023.100401 ↗
8. Chentouf, F.Z., and Bouchkaren, S. (2021). Blockchain for Cybersecurity in IoT. Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain for Future Cybersecurity Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-74575-2_4 ↗
9. SMART on FHIR: A standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records10.1093/jamia/ocv189 ↗
10. Benson, T., and Grieve, G. (2016). Principles of Health Interoperability, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-30370-3 ↗
11. Pricing via Processing or Combatting Junk Mail10.1007/3-540-48071-4_10 ↗
12. Awasthi, R., and Tiwari, A. (2025). Blockchain Algorithm. The Impact of Algorithmic Technologies on Healthcare, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9781394305490.ch15 ↗
13. Sapra, N., Shaikh, I., and Dash, A. (2023). Impact of Proof of Work (PoW)-Based Blockchain Applications on the Environment: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. J. Risk Financial Manag., 16.10.3390/jrfm16040218 ↗
14. Bitcoin’s Growing Water Footprint
15. Decentralized Trust Management in Web 3.0: A Comprehensive Approach to Network Security
16. Decision Making Using the Blockchain Proof of Authority Consensus10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.071 ↗
17. An Efficient Proof-of-Authority Consensus Scheme against Cloning Attacks10.1016/j.comcom.2024.107975 ↗
18. Du, D., Feng, W., Huang, M., Feng, S., and Wang, J. (2025). Research on Consensus Algorithm for Intellectual Property Transactions Based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerant (PBFT) Algorithm. Electronics, 14.10.3390/electronics14081665 ↗
19. Onireti, O., Zhang, L., and Imran, M.A. (2019). On the Viable Area of Wireless Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (Pbft) Blockchain Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), IEEE.10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013778 ↗
20. Sajna, S., Pillai, M.J., and Rajan, G. (2025). Enhancing Healthcare Consensus Mechanism—A Reputation Integrated Variant of PBFT (BR-PBFT). PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0336039 ↗
21. Hegde, P., and Maddikunta, P.K.R. (2023). Secure PBFT Consensus-Based Lightweight Blockchain for Healthcare Application. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063757 ↗
22. An Efficient Byzantine Consensus Mechanism Based on Healthcare Sector in Blockchain10.1007/s11042-023-17548-3 ↗
23. The Evolution of Blockchain: A Bibliometric Study10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895646 ↗
24. Buterin, V. (2014). A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform, Ethereum Foundation.
25. (2025, February 17). Performance Analysis of Hyperledger Fabric Platforms—Nasir—2018—Security and Communication Networks—Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2018/3976093.10.1155/2018/3976093 ↗
26. Li, D., Wong, W.E., and Guo, J. (2020). A Survey on Blockchain for Enterprise Using Hyperledger Fabric and Composer. Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA), Harbin, China, 3–6 January 2020, IEEE.10.1109/DSA.2019.00017 ↗
27. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday, 2.10.5210/fm.v2i9.548 ↗
28. De Filippi, P., Wray, C., and Sileno, G. (2021). Smart Contracts. Internet Policy Rev., 10.10.14763/2021.2.1549 ↗
29. Security and Privacy in Smart City: A Secure e-Voting System Based on Blockchain10.11591/ijece.v13i2.pp1848-1857 ↗
30. Uriawan, W., Wahana, A., Slamet, C., and Suci Asih, V. (2021). A DApp Architecture for Personal Lending on Blockchain. Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT), IEEE.10.1109/ICWT52862.2021.9678397 ↗
31. A First Look at Blockchain-based Decentralized Applications10.1002/spe.2751 ↗
32. (2024, September 09). Industry Reports|DappRadar. Available online: https://dappradar.com/reports.
33. Security and Privacy of Electronic Health Records: Concerns and Challenges10.1016/j.eij.2020.07.003 ↗
34. Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment and Tools: A Systematic Review10.1093/jamia/ocad120 ↗
35. Comparison of Blockchain Platforms: A Systematic Review and Healthcare Examples10.1093/jamia/ocy185 ↗
36. Systematic Review on AI-Blockchain Based E-Healthcare Records Management Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3201878 ↗
37. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., and Lippman, A. (2016). MedRec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management. Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD), Vienna, Austria, 22–24 August 2016, IEEE.10.1109/OBD.2016.11 ↗
38. Blockchain-Based Decentralized Trust Management in Vehicular Networks10.1109/JIOT.2018.2836144 ↗
39. FHIRChain: Applying blockchain to securely and scalably share clinical data10.1016/j.csbj.2018.07.004 ↗
40. Jabbar, R., Fetais, N., Krichen, M., and Barkaoui, K. (2020). Blockchain Technology for Healthcare: Enhancing Shared Electronic Health Record Interoperability and Integrity. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies (ICIoT), Doha, Qatar, 2–5 February 2020, IEEE.10.1109/ICIoT48696.2020.9089570 ↗
41. A Secure Blockchain-Based e-Health Records Storage and Sharing Scheme
42. Blockchain-Based Electronic Healthcare Record System for Healthcare 4.0 Applications
43. Kim, M., Yu, S., Lee, J., Park, Y., and Park, Y. (2020). Design of Secure Protocol for Cloud-Assisted Electronic Health Record System Using Blockchain. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102913 ↗
44. Chenthara, S., Ahmed, K., Wang, H., Whittaker, F., and Chen, Z. (2020). Healthchain: A Novel Framework on Privacy Preservation of Electronic Health Records Using Blockchain Technology. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0243043 ↗
45. Patient Consent Management by a Purpose-Based Consent Model for Electronic Health Record Based on Blockchain Technology10.4258/hir.2020.26.4.265 ↗
46. Quasim, M.T., Radwan, A.A.E., Alshmrani, G.M.M., and Meraj, M. (2020). A Blockchain Framework for Secure Electronic Health Records in Healthcare Industry. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (ICSTCEE), Bengaluru, India, 9–10 October 2020, IEEE.10.1109/ICSTCEE49637.2020.9277193 ↗
47. A Blockchain Based Patient Centric Electronic Health Record Storage and Integrity Management for E-Health Systems10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100513 ↗
48. Abunadi, I., and Kumar, R. (2021). BSF-EHR: Blockchain Security Framework for Electronic Health Records of Patients. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21082865 ↗
49. Hashim, F., Shuaib, K., and Sallabi, F. (2021). MedShard: Electronic Health Record Sharing Using Blockchain Sharding. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13115889 ↗
50. BIoTHR: Electronic Health Record Servicing Scheme in IoT-Blockchain Ecosystem10.1109/JIOT.2021.3050703 ↗
51. Blockchain-Enabled Secure Interoperability: Advancing Electronic Health Records (EHR) Data Exchange
52. Ktari, J., Frikha, T., Ben Amor, N., Louraidh, L., Elmannai, H., and Hamdi, M. (2022). IoMT-Based Platform for E-Health Monitoring Based on the Blockchain. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11152314 ↗
53. Ndzimakhwe, M., Telukdarie, A., Munien, I., Vermeulen, A., Chude-Okonkwo, U.K., and Philbin, S.P. (2023). A Framework for User-Focused Electronic Health Record System Leveraging Hyperledger Fabric. Information, 14.10.3390/info14010051 ↗
54. Sonkamble, R.G., Bongale, A.M., Phansalkar, S., Sharma, A., and Rajput, S. (2023). Secure Data Transmission of Electronic Health Records Using Blockchain Technology. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12041015 ↗
55. Reegu, F.A., Abas, H., Gulzar, Y., Xin, Q., Alwan, A.A., Jabbari, A., Sonkamble, R.G., and Dziyauddin, R.A. (2023). Blockchain-Based Framework for Interoperable Electronic Health Records for an Improved Healthcare System. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15086337 ↗
56. Advancing Healthcare Security: A Cutting-Edge Zero-Trust Blockchain Solution for Protecting Electronic Health Records10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-03-012 ↗
57. Chinnasamy, P., Albakri, A., Khan, M., Raja, A.A., Kiran, A., and Babu, J.C. (2023). Smart Contract-Enabled Secure Sharing of Health Data for a Mobile Cloud-Based E-Health System. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063970 ↗
58. Díaz, Á., and Kaschel, H. (2023). Scalable Electronic Health Record Management System Using a Dual-Channel Blockchain Hyperledger Fabric. Systems, 11.10.3390/systems11070346 ↗
59. Secure Internet of Medical Things Based Electronic Health Records Scheme in Trust Decentralized Loop Federated Learning Consensus Blockchain
60. Enabling Secure Health Information Sharing among Healthcare Organizations by Public Blockchain10.1007/s11042-024-18181-4 ↗
61. BEHeDaS: A Blockchain Electronic Health Data System for Secure Medical Records Exchange10.62411/jcta.9509 ↗
62. Blockchain Technology for Integrating Electronic Records of Digital Healthcare System
63. Proof of Trust and Expertise (PoTE): A Novel Consensus Mechanism for Enhanced Security and Scalability in Electronic Health Record Management10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3424685 ↗
64. Lightweight Blockchain Mechanism for Secure Data Transmission in Healthcare System10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107411 ↗
65. Quantum Secure Patient Login Credential System Using Blockchain for Electronic Health Record Sharing Framework10.1038/s41598-025-86658-9 ↗
66. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy10.1142/S0218488502001648 ↗
67. El Emam, K., Jonker, E., Arbuckle, L., and Malin, B. (2011). A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0028071 ↗
68. Wang, Z., Khatibi, E., Firouzi, F., Mousavi, S.R., Chakrabarty, K., and Rahmani, A.M. (2025). Linkage Attacks Expose Identity Risks in Public ECG Data Sharing. 2025 47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), IEEE.10.1109/EMBC58623.2025.11253028 ↗
69. Wang, Z., Khatibi, E., Kazemi, K., Azimi, I., Mousavi, S., Malik, S., and Rahmani, A.M. (2025). TransECG: Leveraging transformers for explainable ECG re-identification risk analysis. arXiv.
70. Addressing contemporary threats in anonymised healthcare data using privacy engineering10.1038/s41746-025-01520-6 ↗
71. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3 ↗
72. (2025, September 18). Mosaic Effect. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_effect.
73. Khan, H., Menten, L., and Peeters, L.M. (2025). An Algorithmic Pipeline for GDPR-Compliant Healthcare Data Anonymisation: Moving Toward Standardisation. arXiv.
74. Privacy preserving strategies for electronic health records in the era of large language models10.1038/s41746-025-01429-0 ↗
75. Alnasser, M., and Li, S. (2025). Privacy-enhancing technologies in collaborative healthcare analysis. Cryptography, 9.10.3390/cryptography9020024 ↗
76. Paulson, D., and Elvis, G. (2026, February 28). Differential Privacy Techniques in Machine Learning for Health Record Analysis. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392921932_Differential_Privacy_Techniques_in_Machine_Learning_for_Health_Record_Analysis.10.20944/preprints202506.1752.v1 ↗
77. Bukaita, W., and Chadalawada, P. (2025). Balancing Privacy and Utility: A Two Stage Novel Approach to Differential Privacy in EHR Data. 2025 IEEE 15th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), IEEE.10.1109/ICSET65917.2025.11284270 ↗
78. Vardalachakis, M., and Kalloniatis, C. (2025). The role of Anonymization Techniques in Differential Privacy. 2025 International Conference on Computer Technology Applications (ICCTA), IEEE.10.1109/ICCTA65425.2025.11166256 ↗
79. Enhancing data privacy: A comprehensive survey of privacy-enabling technologies10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3546618 ↗
80. A scoping review of privacy and utility metrics in medical synthetic data10.1038/s41746-024-01359-3 ↗
81. Blockchain-enabled federated learning with edge analytics for secure and efficient electronic health records management10.1038/s41598-025-12225-x ↗
82. Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review10.1007/s12083-025-02148-9 ↗
83. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., and y Arcas, B.A. (2017, January 20–22). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
84. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions