The effect of nano-silica material and alkali resistant glass fibre on the OGFC asphalt mixture
Source abstract
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to improve the physical and mechanical properties of open-graded friction courses (OGFCs). Therefore, the combination of nano-silica (NS) material and alkali resistant (AR) glass fibre was used as additives. The effects of these materials were evaluated on the OGFC mixtures by laboratory tests including draindown, cantabro abrasion test, porosity, permeability, slip resistance, indirect tensile strength (ITS), moisture susceptibility (TSR) and dynamic creep tests. Draindown tests were conducted on different mixtures including 4% NS by weight of the asphalt binder, 0.1% and 0.2% AR-glass fibre by weight of the mix and 5.5% and 6.5% asphalt binders by weight of mix. The results showed that the combination of 4% NS material, 0.2% AR-glass fibre and 5.5% asphalt binder is suitable and reduces the draindown significantly. The test results showed that, while the use of this compound in OGFC led to a reduction of porosity by only about 12%, cohesion resistance, slip resistance, wet and dry ITS and rutting resistance of OGFC were increased by about 50%, 16%, 30% and 50%, respectively. Also, due to the relatively similar effects of this combination on the wet and dry ITS, the percentage of TSR increased by a very small amount (about 3%).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO, 2014. Standard method of test for determination of draindown characteristics in uncompacted asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T 305, Washington, DC.
2. Abtahi S.M. · Journal of Engineering Fibers and Fabrics · 2013 · 8920 · 25
3. Alvarez, A.E. et al., 2006. Optimizing the design of permeable friction courses (PFC). Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration.
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(379)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(379) ↗
5. ASTM C131 / C131M-14 · 2006
6. ASTM D6927-15, 2015. Standard test method for Marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.
7. ASTM D7063/D7063M-18 · 2018
8. ASTM D7064 / D7064M-08 · 2013
9. ASTM E303-93 · 2018
10. 10.3141/2456-0310.3141/2456-03 ↗
11. Cooley L. A. · 2009
12. 10.3141/1723-0310.3141/1723-03 ↗
13. Donath, M., and Monica, J, 2008. The effect of gradation and fibre on the performance of open graded friction course mixes in Costa Rica, 87th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January, 21–-25.
14. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.00910.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.009 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:4(416)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:4(416) ↗
16. Huber, G, 2000. Performance survey on open-graded friction course mixes. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Synthesis of Highway Practice 284. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
17. Kaloush K.E · 2001
18. Kaloush K.E. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving · 2002 · 71 · 248
19. Kandhal, P. S., and Mallick, R. B, 1998. Open-graded friction courses: State of practice. NCAT Rep. No. 98-7, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Washington, DC.
20. Kandhal, P. S., and Mallick, R. B., 1999. Design of new-generation open-graded friction courses. Rep. No. 99-3, National Center of Asphalt Technology (NCAT), Auburn, Ala.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1986)112:1(29)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1986)112:1(29) ↗
22. 10.1016/S0169-1317(99)00017-410.1016/S0169-1317(99)00017-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.07610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.076 ↗
24. Lytton R. L. · Rep. SHRP-A-357, TRB · 1993 · 1 · 29
25. Mallick R.B. · NCAT Report 00-01 · 2000
26. Mallick R.B. · 2018
27. 10.11113/jt.v78.950910.11113/jt.v78.9509 ↗
28. 10.17226/2219110.17226/22191 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(527)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(527) ↗
30. Perez-Jimenez F. E. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 1265 · 59
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000016210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000162 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000016210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000162 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
34. 10.1080/10298436.2014.92562210.1080/10298436.2014.925622 ↗
35. Saiton A. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 1265 · 69
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000171510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001715 ↗
37. SA (Standards Australia) · 1995
38. Watson, D. E. et al., 2003. Refinement of new-generation open-graded friction course mix design. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1832. TRB. National Research Council, Washington, DC, 78–85.10.3141/1832-10 ↗
39. Watson D. · 2004 · 182
40. 10.3141/1616-0510.3141/1616-05 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000069010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000690 ↗
42. Zhaoxing Xie · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2019
43. Zhaoxing Xie · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2015