journal article·2026-04-09Open access

Teaching Strategies and Methods in a Complex Education Process: Use Case of Multi-Level Computer-Assisted Exercises on Constructive Simulation Systems

Miro Čolić, Mirko Sužnjević

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

This study develops a new concept of computer-assisted exercises (CAX) on constructive simulation systems and how the proposed concept affects the strategy and teaching methods. The current state of affairs in the field of defense and security, both in Europe and in the world, requires the acquisition of competencies (European Qualifications Framework—EQF: knowledge, skills, independence, and responsibility), i.e., the education and training of a significantly larger number of personnel in the field of defense and security than has been the case in the last 70 years. In addition, an important specificity of today is that students need to acquire some competencies that were almost unknown until recently. Most of these competencies are the result of the rapid development of technology, which has significantly changed human life in all areas. In order to respond to the modern requirements of conducting operations, where the transfer of information both horizontally and vertically is exponentially accelerated, current concepts of preparation and implementation of education and training, of which exercises are often the most important part, need to be replaced with new concepts, and one such concept is developed in this paper. New information introduced is mostly related to the new weapons that are being introduced (unmanned systems, hypersonic missiles, weapons based on microwaves and lasers, etc.), which all result in necessary changes to the traditional approach to conducting war, i.e., tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP). This novel exercise concept allows for the simultaneous implementation of training for up to three or four hierarchical levels (e.g., TF Div, brigade, battalion, and company) in one exercise, while in most countries, including the NATO alliance, it is still common for such exercises to be conducted according to a concept that is over 20 years old and, as a rule, is focused on the implementation of exercises for one or two hierarchical levels. This approach allows key personnel from the headquarters of units from four hierarchical levels to be simulated in real time, which is not provided by current concepts for preparing and conducting exercises. The new concept was applied as a multi-level, computer-assisted exercise (CAX) on constructive simulation systems. In addition, significant advantages of the new concept relate to the flexibility and adaptability of the proposed concept to be applied in addition to operational units and in training institutions such as academies and higher education institutions. In addition to the above, the new concept requires a shorter planning period as well as fewer total resources needed for the preparation and implementation of the exercise. The management, organizational, and technological components of the proposed exercise concept are implemented in the CAX model. The hypotheses in this paper will be tested in an applied study, which was evaluated through an external evaluation body. The implemented CAX model was tested in Croatia on the example of using exercises at the Croatian Defense Academy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Military Strategy and Technology · Simulation Techniques and Applications · Advanced Research in Science and Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Industry 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities in Competency Development for Defense Apparatus’ Human Resources
2. David, C. (2011). Emelifeonwu, Generic Officer Professional Military Education—Reference Curriculum.
3. Kim, K., Park, T., Pastrana, J., Marin, M., Cortes, A.E., Rabelo, L.C., and Lee, G. (2014, January 7–10). Modeling of Complex Scenarios using LVC Simulation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014, Savannah, GA, USA.10.1109/WSC.2014.7020133 ↗
4. Hodson, D. (2009). Performance Analysis of Live-Virtual-Constructive and Distributed Virtual Simulations: Defining Requirements in Terms of Temporal Consistency. [Doctoral Dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB].
5. Holth, T., and Boe, O. (2019). Lost in Transition: The Dissemination of Digitization and the Challenges of Leading in the Military Educational Organization. Front. Psychol., 10.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02049 ↗
6. Kincaid, J.P., and Westerlund, K.K. (2009, January 13–16). Simulation in Education and Training. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/WSC.2009.5429337 ↗
7. NATO Standardization Office (2018). NATO Standards AMSP 03, Guidance for Modeling and Simulation Standards in NATO and Multinational Computer Assisted Exercise with Distributed Simulation, NATO Standardization Office. Available online: https://www.sto.nato.int/the-collaborative-programme-of-work-cpow/modeling-and-simulation/nato-modelling-simulation-group/nato-ms-standards-and-guidance/amsp03/.
8. NATO Standardization Office (2017). NATO Standards AMSP 04, NATO Education and Training Network Federation Architecture and FOM Design (NETN FAFD), NATO Standardization Office. Edition A, Version 1.
9. Pollock, B., Winer, E., and Gilbert, S. (2012, January 20–22). LVC interaction within a mixed reality training system. Proceedings of the 2012 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.912193 ↗
10. Hannay, J.E., Mevassvik, O.M., Skjeltorp, A., and Brathen, K. (2026, January 10). LVC Simulation for Land Operations Training, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI), P.O. Box 25, NO-2027 Kjeller, Norway, 2017. Available online: https://web-backend.simula.no/sites/default/files/publications/files/msg126-paper16-hannay-etal-fix.pdf.
11. Architectural work for modeling and simulation combining the NATO Architecture Framework and C3 Taxonomy
12. The art and science of live, virtual, and constructive simulation for test and analysis
13. Constructive Simulation Programs and NATO Functional Area Services Applied in Computer Assisted Exercises10.2478/raft-2018-0019 ↗
14. Collaborative learning: What is it?10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092 ↗
15. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (2008). Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press.
16. Bergman, J., and Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom, Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day, International Society for Technology in Education.
17. Bates, A.W. (2022). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning, Tony Bates Associates Ltd.. [3rd ed.]. Available online: https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m/.
18. A simulation framework for crisis management: Design and use, Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory10.1016/j.simpat.2018.03.001 ↗
19. Čolić, M. (2023, January 22–26). Computer-supported Education of the Reserve Officers of the Armed Forces. Proceedings of the 2023 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia.10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159935 ↗
20. Peiris, P.S.H. (2016). Geographical Information System for Disaster Management, Apple Academic Press Inc.
21. Bistron, M., and Piotrowski, Z. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Applications in Military Systems and Their Influence on Sense of Security of Citizens. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10070871 ↗
22. Smith, B.L., and MacGregor, J.T. (1993). What is Collaborative Learning?, National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment at Pennsylvania State University.
23. Brown, S. (2007). Assessment of Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, The University of Gloucestershire.