journal article·2026-04-10Open access

Effect of Particle Size Distribution and Dosage of Clam Shell-Derived Filler on the Mechanical Performance of Cementitious Mortars

Benjamín Antonio García Montecinos, Meylí Valin Fernández, Luis Enrique Merino Quilodrán, Iván Ignacio Muñoz Soto, José Luis Valin Rivera

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

From an environmental perspective, the use of clam shells contributes positively to marine waste management and promotes more sustainable construction practices. This study aims to analyze the influence of clam shell-derived filler on the mechanical properties of cementitious mortars, evaluating its effect as a function of dosage and particle fineness, in order to determine its potential as a sustainable additive in construction applications. The shells were ground for 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 h and incorporated at percentages ranging from 0.5% to 5.0% by mass of cement. Slump (reduced Abram’s cone) was performed in the fresh state for each specimen mixture, while flexural strength, and compressive strength tests were performed at 7, 14, and 28 days of curing. Microstructural characterization was also performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis. In addition, particle size distribution parameters were determined to quantify the effect of grinding time on particle refinement and its relationship with mechanical performance. A multifactor ANOVA was conducted to evaluate the statistical significance of grinding time and filler dosage on compressive strength. The results showed that the combination of 0.5 h of grinding and 1.0% filler provided the best mechanical performance for both flexural and compressive strength, with values of 7.27 MPa and 26.16 MPa, respectively. Dosages higher than 2.0% tended to decrease strength, which is associated with saturation of non-cementing particles. EDX analysis showed adequate calcium distribution without generating chemical segregation. The results showed that the combination of 0.5 h of grinding and 1.0% filler provided the best mechanical performance for both flexural and compressive strength, with values of 7.27 MPa and 26.16 MPa, respectively. Dosages higher than 2.0% tended to decrease strength, which is associated with saturation effects and increased specific surface area. The statistical analysis confirmed that both grinding time and filler dosage significantly influence compressive strength, highlighting the importance of optimizing particle size distribution and filler content to achieve improved mechanical performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Materials Engineering and Processing · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering (DIM), Faculty of Engineering (FI), University of Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile

Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070409, Chile

Escuela de Ingeniería Mecánica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2430000, Chile

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo · Proyecto UdeC

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Influence of recycled rice husk ash filler on the mechanical performance of asphalt mixtures: A mortar scale analysis10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134832 ↗
2. Properties of cement made by partially replacing cement raw materials with municipal solid waste ashes and calcium carbide waste10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.014 ↗
3. High titanium heavy slag powder as a sustainability filler and its influence on the performance of asphalt mortar10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.037 ↗
4. Valin Fernández, M., Muñoz Toro, B.S., Merino Quilodrán, L.E., Valin Rivera, J.L., Salas Salgado, A.F., and Palacio, D.A. (2024). Experimental Study of the Mechanical Properties of Mortar with Biobío Region Clam Shells Used as a Partial Replacement for Cement. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14219756 ↗
5. Composite cement mortars based on marine sediments and oyster shell powder10.3989/mc.2016.01915 ↗
6. Performance of mussel shell as aggregate in plain concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.091 ↗
7. Chemical–mechanical characteristics of crushed oyster-shell10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00159-9 ↗
8. Towards sustainable concrete: Cement replacement using Egyptian cornstalk ash
9. Assessing the mechanical, durability, thermal and microstructural properties of sea shell ash based lightweight foamed concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133018 ↗
10. Properties and Structure of Functional Concrete Mixtures Modified with River Shell Powder10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-07-020 ↗
11. (1968). Cement–Terminology, Classification and General Specifications (Standard No. NCh148.Of68). Available online: https://www.cesmec.cl/medios/DIC/normas/NCh148Of68.pdf.
12. (2005). Drinking Water–Part 1: Requirements (Standard No. NCh409/1.Of2005).
13. (2022). Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate (Standard No. ASTM C128-22).
14. (1997). Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate (Standard No. ASTM C29/C29M-97).
15. (2006). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Standard No. ASTM C136-06).
16. (2004). Standard Test Methods for Determining Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils by Sieve Analysis 1 (Standard No. ASTM D6913/D6913M).
17. (2018). Standard Practice for Reducing Samples of Aggregate to Testing Size (Standard No. ASTM C702/C702M-18).
18. (2022). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Metal Powders (Standard No. ASTM B-214).
19. (2009). Aggregates for Mortars and Concretes—Sieving and Determination of Particle Size (Standard No. NCh 165.Of2009).
20. (2009). Concrete–Determination of Consistency–Slump Test (Abrams Cone Method) (Standard No. NCh 1019.Of2009). Available online: https://www.cesmec.cl/medios/DIC/normas/NCh1019Of2009.pdf.
21. (2009). Flexural Tensile Test (Standard No. NCh1038.Of77).
22. (1967). Cements–Flexural and Compressive Strength Test of Cement Mortars (Standard No. NCh 158 Of.1967). Available online: https://tecnohorm.weebly.com/uploads/9/6/2/7/9627075/nch0158-1967.pdf.
23. Development and characterization of blended cements containing seashell powder10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.111 ↗
24. Influence of the usage of waste oyster shell powder on mechanical properties and durability of mortar10.1016/j.apt.2022.103503 ↗
25. Effect of crushed cockle shell as partial fine aggregate replacement on workability and strength of lightweight concrete10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.140 ↗
26. González-Caro, Á., Merino-Lechuga, A.M., Fernández-Ledesma, E., Fernández-Rodríguez, J.M., Jiménez, J.R., and Suescum-Morales, D. (2023). The Effect of Acanthocardia tuberculata Shell Powder as Filler on the Performance of Self-Compacting Mortar. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16041734 ↗
27. Characterization on the recycling of waste seashells with Portland cement towards sustainable cementitious materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.122 ↗
28. Performance of self-compacting mortars with granite sludge as aggregate10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118998 ↗
29. Assaad, J.J., and Saba, M. (2023). Use of Seashell and Limestone Fillers in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers for Masonry Mortars. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13020186 ↗