journal article·2018-06-03

Polyampholyte polymer as a stabiliser for subgrade soil

Ana K. Rodriguez, Chandramohan Ayyavu, Srinath R. Iyengar, Hassan S. Bazzi, Eyad Masad, Dallas Little, Howard J. M. Hanley

Publisher page

Abstract

This study evaluates the potential of selected ionic polymers to act as pavement subgrade binders. Investigations were based on their relative performance with a Qatari soil which was selected as typical of a pavement subgrade to be found in the Middle East and North African region. The polymeric binders chosen were three synthetic ionic variations of polyacrylamide: cationic poly(acrylamidopropyl trimethyl ammonium chloride) (designated PAMTAC), anionic hydrolysed poly(acrylamide) (HPAM) and the ampholitic terpolymer poly(acrylamide-co-sodiumacrylate-co-(3-acrylamidopropyl) trimethylammonium chloride) (TPAM). The polymers were characterised by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and nuclear magnetic spectroscopy (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR). The comparative performance of the polymer-treated soil was judged on the basis of results obtained from selected standard mechanical test data: specifically, the unconfined compressed strength, the stiffness modulus and the toughness. It is concluded that a 50% w/w aqueous solution of the ampholitic terpolymer applied at a dosage of 2.0% by dry weight of the soil gives the best subgrade stabilisation. Of some significance, it is further noted that this ampholitic polymer was superior as a binding agent to the traditional standard, Portland cement, judged under equivalent but nonstandard conditions. Modifying the polymer to act as a binder for subgrade soils in general is also discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Texas A&M University at Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar

Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 2008
2. AASHTO · 2009
3. 10.1016/j.jiec.2010.10.03010.1016/j.jiec.2010.10.030 ↗
4. Abdollahi Z. · Chemeca conference, engineering a better world. Chemeca 2011, 18–21 September 2011 Hilton Hotel, NSW, Australia · 2011
5. 10.1016/0037-0738(88)90040-110.1016/0037-0738(88)90040-1 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.02.00210.1016/j.trgeo.2014.02.002 ↗
7. ASTM · 2004
8. ASTM · 2005
9. ASTM · 2007
10. ASTM · 2007
11. ASTM · 2008
12. ASTM · 2011
13. Aubrey, D.W. (2005). V.In: D.E. Packham, ed.Handbook of adhesion. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley Sons, p. 536.10.1002/0470014229.ch20 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.06110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.061 ↗
15. 10.1097/00010694-199410000-0000210.1097/00010694-199410000-00002 ↗
16. Bhuiyan J.U. · Transportation Research Record · 1995 · 1486 · 77
17. BSI · 2000
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.02.03010.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.02.030 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:2(283) ↗
20. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-051810.1002/(ISSN)1099-0518 ↗
21. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-051810.1002/(ISSN)1099-0518 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00774-110.1016/S0032-3861(01)00774-1 ↗
23. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-051810.1002/(ISSN)1099-0518 ↗
24. 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1978.011.01.0410.1144/GSL.QJEG.1978.011.01.04 ↗
25. 10.1021/ma00148a01610.1021/ma00148a016 ↗
26. Heffer A.W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2005 · 74 · 139
27. 10.1016/0013-7952(80)90028-910.1016/0013-7952(80)90028-9 ↗
28. 10.1295/polymj.15.10310.1295/polymj.15.103 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000061210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000612 ↗
30. 10.1021/ma00090a00710.1021/ma00090a007 ↗
31. 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1978.011.01.0110.1144/GSL.QJEG.1978.011.01.01 ↗
32. 10.1180/000985502374011210.1180/0009855023740112 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.clay.2011.01.01710.1016/j.clay.2011.01.017 ↗
34. Levy G.J. · 1997 · 400
35. Little D.N. · 1987
36. Lulu R. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 1
37. 10.2136/sssaj2009.027910.2136/sssaj2009.0279 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.008 ↗
39. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-462810.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628 ↗
40. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-390010.1002/(ISSN)1521-3900 ↗
41. 10.1002/pol.1979.17017030510.1002/pol.1979.170170305 ↗
42. Newman K. · 2004
43. Orts W.J. · Polym. News · 1999 · 24 · 406
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:1(58)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:1(58) ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.02310.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.023 ↗
46. 10.3141/1546-0310.3141/1546-03 ↗
47. Rabiee A. · Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology · 2010 · 16 · 11110.1002/vnl.20229 ↗
48. Rabiee A. · Iranian Polymer Journal · 2005 · 14 · 603
49. Sherwood P. · Rep., Transp. Res. Lab., Department of Transport · 1993
50. 10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92002-010.1016/S0065-2113(04)92002-0 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.03410.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.034 ↗
52. Yasuda K. · Polymer Journal · 1988 · 15 · 103
53. 10.1002/978047017291910.1002/9780470172919 ↗
54. Zeynali M.E. · Iranian Polymer Journal · 2002 · 11 · 269
55. Ziaee F. · Iranian Polymer Journal · 2009 · 18 · 947