journal article·2026-04-09Open access

Validation of the 15-Item and 5-Item Versions of the Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Spanish Adolescents Aged 11–18: A Study Using the Original 18-Item Version

José Antonio Romero-Macarrilla, Robert Bauer, Javier Fernández-Sánchez, Eva Fernández-Sánchez, Iván González-Gutiérrez, José Carmelo Adsuar, Raquel Pastor-Cisneros, María Mendoza-Muñoz, Jorge Carlos-Vivas, Daniel Collado-Mateo

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

Background: Physical literacy is a multidimensional construct encompassing physical competence, confidence, motivation, knowledge, and lifelong engagement in physical activity. The Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument (PPLI) has been widely used internationally; however, previous adolescent validations have been based on a reduced 9-item version originally developed for teachers. This study aims to evaluate the validity and test–retest reliability of a Spanish adaptation of the original 18-item PPLI in Spanish adolescents aged 11–18 years. Methods: A multi-phase validation study was conducted with 869 Spanish adolescents (421 females). The procedure included: (1) translation and cultural adaptation, (2) Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA; n = 290), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA; n = 579) and invariance analyses, and (3) test–retest reliability assessment. Results: EFA supported a three-factor solution comprising 15 items. CFA showed standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.62 to 0.89, indicating that the latent constructs were adequately represented. Although the 15-item model showed acceptable fit, a 5-item unidimensional short form was developed due to limitations in the three-dimensional models. This short form demonstrated good model fit (scaled RMSEA = 0.073; scaled CFI = 0.992; SRMR = 0.026), adequate convergent validity (AVE = 0.558), high reliability (ω = 0.821), moderate test–retest stability (ICC = 0.69), and full configural, metric, and scalar longitudinal invariance. Conclusions: The 15-, 9-, and 5-item versions of the PPLI are valid and reliable options. The 15-item version allows comprehensive assessment and domain-level interpretation. The 9-item version facilitates comparability with previous international research. The 5-item version may be useful in contexts with time constraints but may not be the preferred choice for comprehensive assessment of physical literacy in clinical or detailed pedagogical diagnostic settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Children's Physical and Motor Development · Physical Education and Pedagogy · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Teaching Training, University of Extremadura, Avenida de la Universidad, S/N, 10071 Cáceres, Spain

Research Centre in Sports Science (CIDE), Rey Juan Carlos University, 28942 Fuenlabrada, Spain

Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Universidad Europea del Atlántico, 39011 Santander, Spain

BioErgon Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain

Physical Activity for Education, Performance and Health (PAEPH) Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain

Department of Communication and Education, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41704 Seville, Spain

Funding

Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego · Spanish Ministry of Universities · Andalusian Regional Government/CUII

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7 ↗
2. Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical Literacy: Throughout the Lifecourse, Routledge.10.4324/9780203881903 ↗
3. A Conceptual Model of an Effective Early Childhood Physical Literacy Pedagogue10.1177/1476718X231219580 ↗
4. World Health Organization (2018). Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World, WHO.
5. Jefatura del Estado (España) (Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE-A-2020-17264), 2020). Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de Diciembre, Por La Que Se Modifica La Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de Mayo, de Educación, Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE-A-2020-17264).
6. McLennan, N. (2021). Making the Case for Inclusive Quality Physical Education Policy Development: A Policy Brief, UNESCO Publishing.
7. Recent Secular Trends in Child and Adolescent Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Internationally: Analyses of Active Healthy Kids Global Alliance Global Matrices 1.0 to 4.010.1123/jpah.2022-0312 ↗
8. Global Trends in Insufficient Physical Activity among Adolescents: A Pooled Analysis of 298 Population-Based Surveys with 1·6 Million Participants10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2 ↗
9. Physical Literacy Profiles Are Associated with Differences in Children’s Physical Activity Participation: A Latent Profile Analysis Approach10.1016/j.jsams.2020.05.007 ↗
10. Relationship Between Physical Literacy and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1007/s40279-024-02129-7 ↗
11. Experiences, Influencing Factors, and Perceived Outcomes from Physical Literacy Interventions: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis10.1080/17482631.2026.2613973 ↗
12. Changes in Physical Activity Patterns from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: The BELINDA Study10.1007/s00431-023-04948-8 ↗
13. Physical Literacy, Physical Activity and Health: Toward an Evidence-Informed Conceptual Model10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3 ↗
14. Jean de Dieu, H., and Zhou, K. (2021). Physical Literacy Assessment Tools: A Systematic Literature Review for Why, What, Who, and How. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18157954 ↗
15. Sum, R.K.W., Ha, A.S.C., Cheng, C.F., Chung, P.K., Yiu, K.T.C., Kuo, C.C., Yu, C.K., and Wang, F.J. (2016). Construction and Validation of a Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Physical Education Teachers. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0155610 ↗
16. Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Adolescents: A Further Validation of PPLI10.1016/j.jesf.2018.03.002 ↗
17. Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument-Spanish Version (PPLI-Sp) for Adults
18. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validation of the Spanish Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Adolescents (S-PPLI)10.1016/j.jesf.2023.03.002 ↗
19. Whitehead, M. (2019). Physical Literacy Across the World, Taylor & Francis.10.4324/9780203702697 ↗
20. Revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki on Its 60th Anniversary: A Modernized Set of Ethical Principles to Promote and Ensure Respect for Participants in a Rapidly Innovating Medical Research Ecosystem10.1001/jama.2024.21902 ↗
21. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 ↗
22. Harkness, J.A., Villar, A., and Edwards, B. (2010). Translation, Adaptation, and Design. Survey Methods in Multicultural, Multinational, and Multiregional Contexts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470609927.ch7 ↗
23. Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 ↗
24. Hambleton, R.K., Merenda, P.F., and Spielberger, C.D. (2004). Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment, Psychology Press.10.4324/9781410611758 ↗
25. Assessing the Use of Back Translation: The Shortcomings of Back Translation as a Quality Testing Method10.1080/13645579.2016.1252188 ↗
26. Scale Development Research10.1177/0011000006288127 ↗
27. Factor Analysis in the Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 ↗
28. Brown, T.A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, The Guilford Press. [2nd ed.].
29. R Core Team (2025). R A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
30. Posit Team (2024). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC. Available online: http://www.posit.co/.
31. Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling10.18637/jss.v048.i02 ↗
32. Rosseel, Y., Jorgensen, T.D., and De Wilde, L. (2025). Latent Variable Analysis, R Package Lavaan Version 0.6-21; CRAN: Contributed Packages, CRAN.
33. Jorgensen, T.D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A.M., and Rosseel, Y. (2026, January 15). SemTools: Useful Tools for Structural Equation Modeling (Version 0.5-7) [R Package]. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools.
34. Bollen, K.A. (2014). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley-Interscience.
35. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives10.1080/10705519909540118 ↗
36. Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guilford Press. [4th ed.].
37. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis
38. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., and Anderson, R.E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, Cengage Learning. [8th ed.].
39. Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272 ↗
40. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit10.1177/0049124192021002005 ↗
41. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data: The Story They Tell Depends on the Estimation Methods10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2 ↗
42. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error10.1177/002224378101800104 ↗
43. An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Data10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466 ↗
44. From Alpha to Omega: A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problem of Internal Consistency Estimation10.1111/bjop.12046 ↗
45. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
46. Assessing Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological Measures10.1027/1016-9040/a000298 ↗
47. The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models10.1080/00273171.2012.715555 ↗
48. Evaluating Model Fit With Ordered Categorical Data Within a Measurement Invariance Framework: A Comparison of Estimators10.1080/10705511.2014.882658 ↗
49. A Conceptual Framework for Early Adolescence: A Platform for Research10.1515/ijamh-2013-0327 ↗
50. Three Concerns with Applying a Bifactor Model as a Structure of Psychopathology10.1177/2167702616657069 ↗
51. Scale Development: Theory and Applications10.1111/peps.12499 ↗
52. The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom10.1177/0049124114543236 ↗
53. Defining Physical Literacy for Application in Australia: A Modified Delphi Method10.1123/jtpe.2018-0264 ↗
54. Physical Literacy, Physical Activity, and Health: A Citation Content Analysis and Narrative Review10.1186/s40798-025-00827-8 ↗
55. Grauduszus, M., Koch, L., Wessely, S., and Joisten, C. (2024). School-Based Promotion of Physical Literacy: A Scoping Review. Front. Public Health, 12.10.3389/fpubh.2024.1322075 ↗
56. Nezondet, C., Gandrieau, J., Bourrelier, J., Nguyen, P., and Zunquin, G. (2023). The Effectiveness of a Physical Literacy-Based Intervention for Increasing Physical Activity Levels and Improving Health Indicators in Overweight and Obese Adolescents (CAPACITES 64). Children, 10.10.3390/children10060956 ↗