journal article·2026-04-09Open access

Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Innovative Teaching

Nikola Kadoić, Jelena Gusić Munđar, Tena Jagačić

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

There are numerous ways in which generative artificial intelligence (GAI) can be applied in the teaching and learning process. This paper presents one application in the Business Decision Analysis (BDA) course. BDA is considered as the most challenging course in the Graduate Study Program in Economic Entrepreneurship at the University of Zagreb Faculty of Organisation and Informatics; consequently, the teachers continuously analyse possibilities to make the course more attractive for students. The innovative teaching activity at BDA was implemented as a betting shop during the first colloquium (which accounts for 50% of the overall grade). In the activity, GAI analysed learning management system (LMS) data of students’ results (attendance, self-assessment test results, logs in the system) of the initial (pre-course) test, as well as their results of the pub quiz (activity organised a week before the colloquium as a preparatory activity). GAI analysed all the data and predicted the number of points each student will achieve. Additionally, GAI calculated the risk index, average growth (among self-assessment tests) and learning consistency for each student. Finally, GAI created a message for each student that explained what went well in their learning activity, what could be improved, and included a motivational note for the test. The rule was: if a student achieved a higher result than the GAI predicted, the teacher would buy a chocolate for that student. More than 60% percent of students achieved a higher score than was predicted. Surprisingly, exceeding the expected result was not in correlation with the risk indices determined by the GAI. Cluster analysis identified four student profiles consistent with the correlation results, showing weak overall agreement between the predicted and achieved scores, except in the male subgroup, while higher predicted scores were associated with higher average growth and lower risk indices. Qualitative analysis of the GAI application in teaching yielded positive comments, as students perceived the activity as helpful, motivating, and engaging, and would have liked more similar activities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Online Learning and Analytics · Artificial Intelligence in Education · AI in Service Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Zagreb Faculty of Organization and Informatics, Pavlinska 2, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia

Funding

University of Zagreb Faculty of Organisation and Informatics

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. He, R., Cao, J., and Tan, T. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Historical Perspective, Oxford University Press.10.1093/nsr/nwaf050 ↗
2. Generative artificial intelligence10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1 ↗
4. How are Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Used in Digital Behavior Change Interventions? A Scoping Review10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.05.007 ↗
5. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
6. Generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review and applications10.1007/s11042-024-20016-1 ↗
7. Threats by artificial intelligence to human health and human existence10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010435 ↗
8. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 ↗
9. Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K.I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., and Sharma, H. (2024). A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice. Educ. Sci., 14.10.3390/educsci14060636 ↗
10. Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3 ↗
11. Higher Education AI Policies—A Document Analysis of University Guidelines10.1111/ejed.70214 ↗
12. Evolving Perspectives on Generative AI in Higher Education: Insights from Two Years of University Stakeholder Analysis10.1007/s11528-025-01150-5 ↗
13. Educators’ perceptions of generative AI: Investigating attitudes, barriers and learning needs in higher education10.1080/14703297.2025.2530767 ↗
14. Examining Faculty and Student Perceptions of Generative AI in University Courses10.1007/s10755-024-09774-w ↗
15. Undergraduate students’ perspectives of generative AI ethics10.1186/s41239-025-00533-1 ↗
16. Opportunities, challenges and school strategies for integrating generative AI in education10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100373 ↗
17. Salhab, R., and Aboushi, M.M. (2025). Influence of AI literacy and 21st-century skills on the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence among college students. Front. Educ., 10.10.3389/feduc.2025.1640212 ↗
18. Sergeeva, O.V., Masalimova, A.R., Zheltukhina, M.R., Chikileva, L.S., Lutskovskai, L.Y., and Luzin, A. (2025). Impact of digital media literacy on attitude toward generative AI acceptance in higher education. Front. Educ., 10.10.3389/feduc.2025.1563148 ↗
19. Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: Investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z ↗
20. Determinants of Student Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education10.34190/ejel.23.1.3599 ↗
21. Li, K.C., Chong, G.H.L., Wong, B.T.M., and Wu, M.M.F. (2025). A TAM-Based Analysis of Hong Kong Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Toward Generative AI in Higher Education and Employment. Educ. Sci., 15.10.3390/educsci15070798 ↗
22. Guiding principles of generative AI for employability and learning in UK universities10.1080/2331186X.2024.2357898 ↗
23. Generative AI in teacher education: Educators’ perceptions of transformative potentials and the triadic nature of AI literacy explored through AI-enhanced methods10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100471 ↗
24. Davila-Moran, R.C., Sanchez Soto, J.M., Lopez Gomez, H.E., Silva Infantes, M., Arias Lizares, A., Huanca Rojas, L.M., and Cama Flores, S.J. (2025). Brief Prompt-Engineering Clinic Substantially Improves AI Literacy and Reduces Technology Anxiety in First-Year Teacher-Education Students: A Pre–Post Pilot Study. Educ. Sci., 15.10.3390/educsci15081010 ↗
25. The role of critical thinking on undergraduates’ reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem-solving10.1111/bjet.13613 ↗
26. Generative AI in Higher Education: University Faculty Perspectives on Opportunities and Challenges10.17718/tojde.1530814 ↗
27. The use of generative AI in statistical data analysis and its impact on teaching statistics at universities of applied sciences10.1111/test.12398 ↗
28. A Training Needs Analysis for AI and Generative AI in Medical Education: Perspectives of Faculty and Students10.1177/23821205251339226 ↗
29. Gasaymeh, A.M.M., Beirat, M.A., and Qbeita, A.A.A. (2024). University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Educ. Sci., 14.10.3390/educsci14101062 ↗
30. Generative AI in academic writing: Does information on authorship impact learners’ revision behavior?10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100350 ↗
31. The use of generative AI by students with disabilities in higher education10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101014 ↗
32. Alghamdi, A.A. (2025). University students’ perceptions of generative AI for critical thinking and creativity: The influence of self-efficacy and disciplinary differences. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., 1–15.10.1080/14703297.2025.2600476 ↗
33. Perceived impact of generative AI on assessments: Comparing educator and student perspectives in Australia, Cyprus, and the United States10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100269 ↗
34. Alkouk, W.A., and Khlaif, Z.N. (2024). AI-resistant assessments in higher education: Practical insights from faculty training workshops. Front. Educ., 9.10.3389/feduc.2024.1499495 ↗
35. Albreiki, B., Zaki, N., and Alashwal, H. (2021). A systematic literature review of student’ performance prediction using machine learning techniques. Educ. Sci., 11.10.3390/educsci11090552 ↗
36. Predicting student performance: A comprehensive review of machine learning, deep learning, and explainable AI approaches10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100548 ↗
37. Rodríguez-Ortiz, M.Á., Santana-Mancilla, P.C., and Anido-Rifón, L.E. (2025). Machine Learning and Generative AI in Learning Analytics for Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Models, Trends, and Challenges. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15158679 ↗
38. Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M.T., and Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT Integration in Higher Education for Personalized Learning, Academic Writing, and Coding Tasks: A Systematic Review. Computers, 14.10.3390/computers14020053 ↗
39. Fisher’s Z to R
40. Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Laval, U., and Niknafs, A. (2026, February 26). NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set Véronique Boiteau. Available online: http://www.jstatsoft.org/.
41. Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics10.1080/01621459.1972.10481279 ↗
42. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2nd ed.].
43. Text Mining with R: A Tidy Approach