The Sonic Explorer: Assessing Angular Structure and Spatial Organization in Sonotopes
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the spatial organization of environmental sounds is essential for linking acoustic patterns with landscape structure and ecological processes. While ecoacoustics has made substantial progress in the temporal and spectral analysis of soundscapes, their directional and spatial components remain comparatively underexplored, particularly through low-cost and scalable approaches. Here we introduce the Sonic Explorer, a lightweight rotational sonic device designed to explore the angular structure and the spatial dynamics of sonotopes, defined as homogeneous spatial sonic units within a soundscape. The system is based on two opposed supercardioid microphones mounted on a rotating platform, coupled with a custom signal-processing framework that analyzes directional variations in sound intensity across frequency classes. Rather than aiming at sound pressure level measurements or full-sphere sound field reconstruction, the Sonic Explorer focuses on detecting spatial contrasts, dominant sound directions, and angular sound patterns relevant to ecological interpretation. Field tests conducted in a human-modified environment demonstrate the ability of the device to identify coherent directional acoustic structures associated with landscape configuration and dominant sound sources. The proposed approach provides a new practical and exploratory tool for landscape and soundscape research, enabling spatially explicit interpretations of sonic environments while maintaining low cost, portability, and adaptability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior · Noise Effects and Management · Music and Audio Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Basic and Applied Sciences, Urbino University, 60129 Urbino, Italy
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Point counts with unlimited distance
2. Ralph, C.J., Sauer, J.R., and Droege, S. (1995). Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts.10.2737/PSW-GTR-149 ↗
3. Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., and Mustoe, S.H. (2000). Bird Census Techniques, Academic Press. [2nd ed.].
4. A conceptual guide to detection probability for point counts and other count-based survey methods
5. Sutherland, W.J. (2006). Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.].10.1017/CBO9780511790508 ↗
6. Using automated recorders and occupancy modeling to monitor common forest birds across a large geographic region10.1002/jwmg.821 ↗
7. Acoustic diversity of forested landscapes: Relationships to habitat structure and anthropogenic pressure10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104508 ↗
8. Mapping spatio-temporal patterns of soundscapes in a mountain landscape10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103722 ↗
9. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds10.1086/282971 ↗
10. Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: Implications for animal communication10.1086/283568 ↗
11. Sound propagation through vegetation10.1016/0022-460X(82)90387-X ↗
12. Review of ground effects on outdoor sound propagation from continuous broadband sources10.1016/0003-682X(88)90086-2 ↗
13. Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.001 ↗
14. Ecoacoustics: The ecological investigation and interpretation of environmental sound10.1007/s12304-015-9248-x ↗
15. Farina, A., and Gage, S.H. (2017). Ecoacoustics: The Ecological Role of Sounds, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119230724 ↗
16. Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: Current use and future applications10.5751/ACE-00974-120114 ↗
17. Farina, A., and Li, P. (2021). Methods in Ecoacoustics, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-82177-7 ↗
18. Bird population density estimated from acoustic signals10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01731.x ↗
19. Accuracy of an acoustic location system for monitoring the position of duetting songbirds in tropical forest10.1121/1.2184988 ↗
20. Context-dependent functions of avian duets revealed by microphone-array recordings and multispeaker playback10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.073 ↗
21. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: Applications, technological considerations and prospectus10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x ↗
22. The Motus Wildlife Tracking System: A collaborative research network to enhance the understanding of wildlife movement10.5751/ACE-00953-120108 ↗
23. Towards automated animal density estimation with acoustic spatial capture-recapture10.1093/biomtc/ujae081 ↗
24. Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation10.1111/csp2.72 ↗
25. Efficacy of extracting indices from large-scale acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity10.1111/cobi.13119 ↗
26. Localizing wild chimpanzees with passive acoustics10.1002/ece3.8902 ↗
27. Predicting species occurrences with habitat network models10.1002/ece3.5567 ↗
28. Landscape structure is a major driver of plant and arthropod diversity in natural European forest fragments10.1002/ecs2.3905 ↗
29. Wallis, D., and Elmeros, M. (2020). Tracking European bat species with passive acoustic directional monitoring. arXiv.10.1080/09524622.2020.1801506 ↗
30. Environmental sound as a mirror of landscape ecological integrity in monitoring programs
31. Bourquin, A., Pretzsch, H., and Seidel, D. (2024). Forest structural heterogeneity positively affects bird richness and acoustic diversity. Front. Ecol. Evol., 12.10.3389/fevo.2024.1387879 ↗
32. Guagliumi, G., Canedoli, C., Potenza, A., Zaffaroni-Caorsi, V., Benocci, R., Pa-doa-Schioppa, E., and Zambon, G. (2025). Unraveling Soundscape Dynamics: The Interaction Between Vegetation Structure and Acoustic Patterns. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17094204 ↗
33. Farina, A. (2014). Soundscape Ecology, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7374-5 ↗
34. Farina, A., and Mullet, T.C. (2024). Sonotope patterns within a mountain beech forest of Northern Italy: A methodological and empirical approach. Front. Ecol. Evol., 12.10.3389/fevo.2024.1341760 ↗
35. Hedfors, P. (2003). Site Soundscapes—Landscape Architecture in the Light of Sound. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Landscape Planning Ultuna Uppsala]. ISSN 1401-6249, ISBN 91-576-6425-0.
36. Farina, A., Gage, S.H., and Salutari, P. (2021). Perspectives on the ecological role of geophysical sounds. Front. Ecol. Evol., 9.10.3389/fevo.2021.748398 ↗
37. Farina, A., Mullet, T.C., Bazarbayeva, T.A., Tazhibayeva, T., Polyakova, S., and Li, P. (2023). Sonotopes reveal dynamic spatio-temporal patterns in a rural landscape of Northern Italy. Front. Ecol. Evol, 11.10.3389/fevo.2023.1205272 ↗
38. The acoustic habitat hypothesis: An ecoacoustics perspective on species habitat selection10.1007/s12304-017-9288-5 ↗
39. The Sounds of Two Landscape Settings: Auditory concepts for physical planning and design10.1080/01426390306524 ↗
40. Spatially explicit modeling in ecology: A review10.1007/s10021-016-0066-z ↗
41. Hedley, R.W., Huang, Y., and Yao, K. (2017). Direction-of-arrival estimation of animal vocalizations for monitoring animal behavior and improving estimates of abundance. Avian Conserv. Ecol., 12.10.5751/ACE-00963-120106 ↗
42. Farina, A., and Mullet, T.C. (2025). The Sonoscape of a Rural Town in the Mediterranean Region: A Case Study of Fivizzano. Acoustics, 7.10.3390/acoustics7020023 ↗
43. Middlicott, C.J., Wiggins, B.J., and Wiggins, B. (2018, January 17–20). Development of ambisonic microphone design tools—Part 1. Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society Conference, New York City, NY, USA.
44. Ahrens, J. (2022). Ambisonic encoding of signals from spherical microphone arrays. arXiv.
45. Crutchfield, J.P., Dunn, D.D., and Jurgens, A. (2023). Whales in Space: Experiencing aquatic animals in their natural place with the Hydroambiphone. arXiv.10.1101/2023.12.27.573441 ↗
46. Field test of an affordable, portable, wireless microphone array for spatial monitoring of animal ecology and behaviour10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00209.x ↗
47. Acoustic imaging with circular microphone array: A new approach for sound field analysis10.1109/TASLP.2024.3369533 ↗
48. A circular microphone array with virtual microphones based on acoustics-informed neural networks10.1121/10.0027915 ↗
49. Farina, A., and Mullet, T.C. (2025). Composition and dynamics of the sonosphere along a soil-surface ecotone at an agricultural site in Northern Italy: A Preliminary Approach. Geosciences, 15.10.3390/geosciences15020034 ↗
50. Murillo, D., Fazi, F., and Shin, M. (2014). Evaluation of Ambisonics Decoding Methods with Experimental Measurements, European Acoustics Association.
51. Zotter, F., and Frank, M. (2019). Ambisonics: A Practical 3D Audio Theory for Recording, Studio Production, Sound Reinforcement, and Virtual Reality, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-17207-7 ↗
52. Backman, J. (2002). Parabolic reflector microphones. Proceedings of the AES 112th Convention, AES.
53. Maher, R.C., and Chen, Z. (2005). Parabolic Dish Microphone System, Montana State University.
54. Reflector microphones for field recording of natural sounds
55. Rural sanctuary: An ecosemiotic agency to preserve human cultural heritage and biodiversity10.1007/s12304-018-9319-x ↗
56. The landscape of fear as a safety eco-field: Experimental evidence10.1007/s12304-023-09522-1 ↗
57. Acoustic space occupancy: Combining ecoacoustics and lidar to model biodiversity variation and detection bias across heterogeneous landscapes10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106172 ↗
58. Connecting soundscape to landscape: Which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration?10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.057 ↗
59. The role of ecoacoustics in monitoring ecosystem degradation and restoration10.1111/rec.70168 ↗