journal article·2026-03-30Open access

Multi-Scale Structural Response in Calligraphic Layout Deviation Detection

Xun Shen, Zhanyang Xu, Liangchen Dai, Yaohui Niu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 7

Abstract

Structural deviation detection in calligraphic layout is an important problem in intelligent calligraphy tutoring systems. Existing approaches typically rely on isolated geometric or pixel-level statistics and lack a unified representation across spatial levels and scales. To address this issue, this study formulated a layout analysis for hard-pen regular script written in Tianzigē grids as a structural deviation detection task. A continuous writing density field was first constructed from the binary stroke foreground, and a three-level spatial partition consisting of page level, row-column level, and single cell level regions was established. Multi-scale structural responses (MSRs) were then computed within these regions to characterize layout deviations in a unified manner. Under controlled parametric perturbations, an original dataset of 1200 pages was evaluated to assess detection performance. In repeated experiments, the joint MSR features achieved an AUC of 0.94 and an F1-score of 0.90, outperforming geometric, pixel-statistical, page-level structural, and traditional machine-learning baselines. The results indicate that multi-level MSRs provide complementary structural information for reliable layout deviation detection and offer a useful basis for hierarchical diagnostic feedback in intelligent calligraphy tutoring systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques · Interactive and Immersive Displays · Data Visualization and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Yan, F., Lan, X., Zhang, H., and Li, L. (2024). Intelligent Evaluation of Chinese Hard-Pen Calligraphy Using a Siamese Transformer Network. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052051 ↗
2. Pfitzmann, B., Auer, C., Dolfi, M., Nassar, A.S., and Staar, P.W.J. (2022, January 14–18). DocLayNet: A Large Human-Annotated Dataset for Document-Layout Analysis. Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’22), Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/3534678.3539043 ↗
3. Huang, Y., Lv, T., Cui, L., Lu, Y., and Wei, F. (2022). LayoutLMv3: Pre-Training for Document AI with Unified Text and Image Masking. arXiv.10.1145/3503161.3548112 ↗
4. UniHDSA: A Unified Relation Prediction Approach for Hierarchical Document Structure Analysis10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111617 ↗
5. Document Layout Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey
6. Subramani, N., Matton, A., Greaves, M., and Lam, A. (2020). A Survey of Deep Learning Approaches for OCR and Document Understanding. arXiv.
7. Text Line Segmentation in Handwritten Documents Using Mumford–Shah Model10.1016/j.patcog.2008.12.021 ↗
8. SRAFE: Siamese Regression Aesthetic Fusion Evaluation for Chinese Calligraphy Based on the Combination of Calligraphy Aesthetics and Deep Learning10.1049/cit2.12095 ↗
9. Aesthetic Evaluation of Chinese Calligraphy Using TabNet: Interpretability and Novel Features for Improved Accuracy10.1587/transfun.2024SML0003 ↗
10. Zhang, Q., and Mitsudo, H. (2025). Aesthetic Evaluation and the Perceived Properties of Chinese Characters: Evidence from Chinese Calligraphy. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0318353 ↗
11. Hamdan, M., Rahiche, A., and Cheriet, M. (2024). HAND: Hierarchical Attention Network for Multi-Scale Handwritten Document Recognition and Layout Analysis. arXiv.10.36227/techrxiv.173610007.79078639/v1 ↗
12. Skeleton Extraction of Hard-Pen Regular Script Based on Stroke Characterization and Ambiguous Zone Detection (SCAD)10.1049/ipr2.13044 ↗
13. Liu, R., Yuan, S., Chen, M., and Chen, B. (2020, January 12–16). MaLiang: An Emotion-Driven Chinese Calligraphy Artwork Composition System. Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’20), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/3394171.3416338 ↗
14. Heer, J. (2021, January 24–29). Fast & Accurate Gaussian Kernel Density Estimation. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS), Virtual.10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623323 ↗
15. Rybakova, E.O., Limonova, E.E., and Nikolaev, D.P. (2024). Fast Gaussian Filter Approximations Comparison on SIMD Computing Platforms. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14114664 ↗
16. Douglass, R.W. (2025). Automated Box-Counting Fractal Dimension Analysis: Sliding Window Optimization and Multi-Fractal Validation. Fractal Fract., 9.10.20944/preprints202508.1392.v1 ↗
17. Wang, J., Wang, Y., Yu, Z., and Zhou, Y. (2025). Effects of Scale Parameters and Counting Origins on Box-Counting Fractal Dimension Calculation. Fractal Fract., 9.10.3390/fractalfract9080549 ↗
18. Li, H., Ma, Y., Bao, H., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Probabilistic Hough Transform for Rectifying Industrial Nameplate Images: A Novel Strategy for Improved Text Detection and Precision in Difficult Environments. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202303.0319.v1 ↗
19. HRDoc: Dataset and Baseline Method toward Hierarchical Reconstruction of Document Structures
20. Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustness
21. Why Do Deep Convolutional Networks Generalize So Poorly to Small Image Transformations?
22. Gilevich, A., Frenkel, M., Shoval, S., and Bormashenko, E. (2024). Time Evolution of the Symmetry of Alphabet Symbols and Its Quantification: Study in the Archeology of Symmetry. Symmetry, 16.10.3390/sym16040465 ↗