Design of flexible pavement thickness using stabilized high plastic soil by means of fly ash-based geopolymer
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an approach for stabilising high plastic soil (HPS) with fly ash-based geopolymer and its application in flexible pavement. The mechanical performance of HPS with various proportions of fly ash (FA) (10, 15, 20, 25, and 30%) based geopolymer were evaluated through a series of experimental investigations. The soil was mixed with sodium hydroxide of 6 and 8 molar concentrations (6M & 8M) and a sodium silicate mixture of ratio 1.5 was used as alkaline activators for (FA). The results clearly indicate that the mechanical performance of (FA)-based geopolymer stabilised HPS increases up to 25% (FA) content and was less prone to swelling and shrinkage behaviour. Also, the microstructure of HPS was studied through the Scanning Electronic Microscope (SEM) with energy dispersive x-ray (EDX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), and Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectra (FTIR), and results showed significant alteration of the microstructure of HPS due to the formation of geopolymeric gel. The application of stabilised HPS is demonstrated for the design of flexible pavement thickness for low and high-volume roads. It has been observed that there is a significant reduction in pavement thickness for stabilised HPS compared to HPS. Thus, it can be used as a sustainable alternative to conventional stabilisers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO T 307-99(2012) 2012. Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials of soils and aggregate materials.
2. 10.1139/cgj-2019-021510.1139/cgj-2019-0215 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1405111110.3390/ma14051111 ↗
4. 10.1051/matecconf/2017970101210.1051/matecconf/20179701012 ↗
5. 10.1007/s40098-020-00426-210.1007/s40098-020-00426-2 ↗
6. 10.5194/essd-11-1675-201910.5194/essd-11-1675-2019 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:3(242)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:3(242) ↗
8. 10.1007/s12517-013-1173-110.1007/s12517-013-1173-1 ↗
9. ASTM C 618-05 2005. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete.
10. 10.1007/s41403-016-0001-910.1007/s41403-016-0001-9 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000085610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000856 ↗
12. 10.15623/ijret.2015.040803910.15623/ijret.2015.0408039 ↗
13. Central Electricity Authority 2020. Report on fly ash generation at coal/lignite based thermal power stations and its utilization in the country for the year 2019-20 (November) 1–32.
14. Chen, F.H., 1975. Foundation on expansive soils. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
15. 10.1007/s11707-010-0138-x10.1007/s11707-010-0138-x ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(568)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(568) ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2018.147328610.1080/14680629.2018.1473286 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11440-012-0200-910.1007/s11440-012-0200-9 ↗
19. Dahale, P.P., Nagarnaik, P.B., and Gajbhiye, A.Y., 2016. Effect of fly ash and lime on stabilization of expansive soil. i-manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 6 (2), 8.
20. Dahale, P. and Rajurkar, V.J., 2014. Effect of rice hush ash on lime stabilized black cotton soil. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 9 (2 SPEC.ISS.), 219–222.
21. 10.1007/BF0191219310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
22. Davidovits, J., 2015. Geopolymer chemistry & applications. 4th ed. Saint-Quentin, France: Institut Géopolymère.
23. 10.21660/2018.46.718110.21660/2018.46.7181 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2015.106240910.1080/14680629.2015.1062409 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.00210.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.002 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000183310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001833 ↗
29. 10.1021/ie00004a03110.1021/ie00004a031 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.20710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.207 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000002810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000028 ↗
32. 10.1080/19386362.2016.115162110.1080/19386362.2016.1151621 ↗
33. Hardjito, D., et al., 2004. On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 101 (6), 467–472.
34. IRC: 37-2012 2012. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements.
35. IRC: 37-2018 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements.
36. IRC: SP 72-2015 2015. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements for low volume roads. Indian Road Congress.
37. Jha, J.N. and Gill, K.S., 2006. Effect of rice husk ash on lime stabilization of soil. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Civil Engineering Division, 87, 33–39.
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12244310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122443 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(538)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:5(538) ↗
40. Kate, J.M., 2005. Strength and volume change behavior of expansive soils treated with fly ash. Geotechnical Special Publication, 130–142, 1851–1865.
41. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10032710.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100327 ↗
42. 10.1177/036119811879721410.1177/0361198118797214 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10853-006-0401-410.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.01910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.019 ↗
45. 10.1021/la026127e10.1021/la026127e ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000236310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002363 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002 ↗
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000149010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001490 ↗
49. Mahajan, S.M. and Parbat, D.K., 2015. Effects of Fly ash on engineering properties of BC soil. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Technologies (IJRESTs), 1 (5), 7–12.
50. 10.1007/978-3-319-97112-4_18510.1007/978-3-319-97112-4_185 ↗
51. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000202310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002023 ↗
52. 10.1007/s40098-012-0015-510.1007/s40098-012-0015-5 ↗
53. Mitchell, J.K. and Soga, K., 2005. Fundamentals of soil behavior. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000152610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001526 ↗
55. Muntohar, A.S., 2002. Utilization of uncontrolled burnt rice husk ash in soil improvement. Civil Engineering Dimension, 4 (2), 100–105.
56. 10.1080/14680629.2018.153013110.1080/14680629.2018.1530131 ↗
57. 10.1007/s12205-019-2251-z10.1007/s12205-019-2251-z ↗
58. 10.1007/s40891-020-00224-z10.1007/s40891-020-00224-z ↗
59. Mustafa Al Bakri, A.M., et al., 2012. Effect of Na2SiO3/NaOH ratios and NaOH molarities on compressive strength of fly-ash-based geopolymer. ACI Materials Journal, 109 (5), 503–508.
60. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.06410.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064 ↗
61. Partha, S.P., et al., 2018. Stabilization of an expansive soil using alkali activated fly ash based geopolymer. In: L. R. Hoyos and J. McCartney, eds. Advances in characterization and analysis of expansive soils and rocks, GeoMest 2017, sustainable civil infrastructures. Cham.
62. 10.1155/2014/93878910.1155/2014/938789 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.00510.1016/j.clay.2016.04.005 ↗
64. 10.1080/14680629.2015.113263210.1080/14680629.2015.1132632 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.06710.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.067 ↗
66. 10.1680/envgeo.15.0000910.1680/envgeo.15.00009 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.07410.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.074 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.10.00210.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.10.002 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.02210.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.022 ↗
70. 10.1007/s40891-020-0186-610.1007/s40891-020-0186-6 ↗
71. 10.1007/s10706-012-9532-310.1007/s10706-012-9532-3 ↗
72. 10.1007/s10706-017-0204-110.1007/s10706-017-0204-1 ↗
73. 10.1680/gi.1997.01030410.1680/gi.1997.010304 ↗
74. 10.1155/2013/50918510.1155/2013/509185 ↗
75. 10.1080/14680629.2019.162119010.1080/14680629.2019.1621190 ↗
76. 10.1007/s40030-019-00418-310.1007/s40030-019-00418-3 ↗
77. 10.1007/s10706-020-01461-910.1007/s10706-020-01461-9 ↗
78. 10.1007/s40891-016-0081-310.1007/s40891-016-0081-3 ↗
79. 10.1080/10298436.2017.140259310.1080/10298436.2017.1402593 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.03410.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.034 ↗
81. 10.1007/978-981-15-5195-6_3010.1007/978-981-15-5195-6_30 ↗
82. 10.1007/s41062-021-00704-910.1007/s41062-021-00704-9 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.sandf.2018.03.00510.1016/j.sandf.2018.03.005 ↗
84. 10.1007/s11069-008-9236-410.1007/s11069-008-9236-4 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.017 ↗
86. 10.1007/BF0283842310.1007/BF02838423 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.01910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.clay.2008.09.00310.1016/j.clay.2008.09.003 ↗