journal article·2025-12-31

Aging sensitivity of recycled binder blends based on assessment of rheological, chemical, and nano-mechanical properties

Osama Altarawneh, Eyad Masad, Amy Epps Martin, Edith Arámbula Mercado, Wubulikasimu Yiming

Publisher page

Abstract

Economic and sustainability factors drive the increased use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in road construction. Recycling agents, or rejuvenators, enhance the rheological properties of aged RAP binders, thereby improving asphalt pavement performance. However, a comprehensive understanding of the impact of recycling agents on binder properties and aging characteristics remains critical. This study investigates these effects through an extensive characterisation of RAP binder blends, focusing on rheological, chemical, and nano-mechanical properties. Key findings reveal that higher RAP content correlates with elevated levels of carbonyl (C=O) and sulfoxide (S=O) bonds, indicating increased oxidative aging. The absorbance aging index (AAI), derived from the SAR-AD (Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, Asphaltene Determinator) test, effectively detected variations in chemical fractions due to laboratory aging and RAP content. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) further quantified changes in the DMT (Derjaguin, Muller, Toropov) modulus with increasing RAP proportions. The Aging Rate (AR) parameter was also used to evaluate the impact of RAP and recycling agents on aging. Recycling agents improved rheological properties and reduced polar associations within RAP binder blends but also heightened aging susceptibility. This research provides critical insights into the interplay between RAP, recycling agents, and aging, offering a foundation for optimising sustainable pavement solutions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Texas A&M University

Hamad Bin Khalifa University

Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Texas A&M University at Qatar

Funding

Qatar Research Development and Innovation Council

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO M320, 2023. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. AASHTO T 313, 2022. Standard method of test for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the bending beam rheometer (BBR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. AASHTO T 315, 2022. Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
4. AASHTO TP 92, 2014. Standard method of test for determining the cracking temperature of asphalt binder using the asphalt binder cracking device (ABCD). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000391010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003910 ↗
6. 10.1080/10298436.2020.179773610.1080/10298436.2020.1797736 ↗
7. 10.1520/JTE2022022910.1520/JTE20220229 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b0373810.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03738 ↗
9. Al-Qadi I.L. Elseifi M. and Carpenter S.H. 2007. Reclaimed asphalt pavement–a literature review.
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000422010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004220 ↗
11. Anderson, R., et al., 2011. Evaluation of the relationship between asphalt binder properties and Non-load related cracking. In: Asphalt paving technology: association of asphalt paving technologists-proceedings of the technical sessions, 80.
12. 10.1002/app.3652010.1002/app.36520 ↗
13. ASTM D2872-22, 2022. Standard test method for effect of heat and Air on a moving film of asphalt binder (rolling thin-film oven test). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
14. ASTM D5404/D5404M, 2019. Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
15. ASTM D6521-22, 2022. Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
16. ASTM E1252-98, 2021. Standard practice for general techniques for obtaining infrared spectra for qualitative analysis. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11986410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119864 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.003 ↗
19. 10.1021/ef400952b10.1021/ef400952b ↗
20. Boysen, R. and Schabron, J., 2015. Automated HPLC SAR-AD separation. Laramie, WY: Western Research Institute.
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.001 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2019.169104210.1080/14680629.2019.1691042 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.033 ↗
24. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b0368910.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03689 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11933110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119331 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_310.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_3 ↗
28. 10.1111/jmi.1203610.1111/jmi.12036 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.17710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.177 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0165710.1021/acs.iecr.7b01657 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000278110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002781 ↗
32. 10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x ↗
33. Hossain Z. Rashid F. and Roy S. 2018. Multiscale evaluation of rejuvenated asphalt binders with a high RAP content. 18-06281.
34. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.03010.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.030 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1602051310.3390/ma16020513 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000291010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002910 ↗
37. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158815010.1080/14680629.2019.1588150 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11968910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119689 ↗
39. Leavitt A. Martin A.E. and Arámbula-Mercado E. 2022. Pilot Test of Proposed Standard Practice for Use of Recycling Agents in Asphalt Mixtures with Recycled Asphalt Materials.
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13478910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134789 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12629010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126290 ↗
42. 10.1021/ie980450o10.1021/ie980450o ↗
43. 10.1088/1742-6596/1813/1/01204410.1088/1742-6596/1813/1/012044 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-210.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-2 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.04210.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.042 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.15110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.151 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000301610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003016 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.017 ↗
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000276910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002769 ↗
50. Pittenger B. Osechinskiy S. and Yablon D. 2019. Measuring nanoscale viscoelastic properties with AFM-based nanoscale DMA.
51. 10.1080/10298436.2017.129326810.1080/10298436.2017.1293268 ↗
52. 10.1177/036119811985145810.1177/0361198119851458 ↗
53. Rowe, G., 2017. Binder specifications with a focus on cracking. In: Presentation given at the north east asphalt user/producer group, hartford, CT.
54. 10.1520/JTE2013024510.1520/JTE20130245 ↗
55. 10.1080/10298436.2022.216154410.1080/10298436.2022.2161544 ↗
56. 10.1177/0361198121101846510.1177/03611981211018465 ↗
57. Williams, B.A., Willis, J.R., and Shacat, J., 2024. Asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-Mix asphalt usage: 2022. Greenbelt, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association, Information Series 138 (13th edition).
58. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138907410.1080/14680629.2017.1389074 ↗
59. Youtcheff J. 2016. Automated high-performance liquid chromatography saturate aromatic resin and asphaltene separation.
60. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.03810.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.038 ↗
61. 10.1617/s11527-014-0332-510.1617/s11527-014-0332-5 ↗