journal article·2024-12-31

Laboratory assessment of the impact of modified asphalt binder on mechanical properties of grouted macadam mixtures under various performance conditions

Mahdi Ghahremani, Iman Aghayan, Sayyed Ali Hosseini, Qing Lu, Reza Behzadian

Publisher page

Abstract

Grouted Macadam (GM) mixtures are used for pavement coatings due to their strong load-bearing capacity and rutting resistance. However, weak asphalt-cement interface bonding reduces crack resistance performance of these mixtures. This study aimed to enhance this adhesion through implementing TEGO Addibit L300 additive at concentrations of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4% by weight of asphalt binder. Various tests assessed additive’s impact on asphalt binder properties, including penetration, softening point, and kinematic viscosity. Adhesion properties were evaluated through sessile drop and semi-circular bending bonding strength tests. Additionally, GM mixture performance was assessed with mechanical tests such as 3-point bending strength, indirect tensile strength, and Marshall stability, considering two conditions: samples tested immediately after a 28-day curing period (non pre-conditioned samples), and samples tested after the same period followed by exposure to 60 ℃ for 16 h (pre-conditioned samples). Results revealed that the adhesion capacity of the asphalt binder significantly affected GM mixture performance in both conditions. Addition of TEGO Addibit L300 enhanced ductility and fracture energy by 53.9% and 45.2%, respectively, in non pre-conditioned samples. In pre-conditioned samples, the additive increased indirect tensile strength by up to 12.1%. The optimal dosage for improving GM materials performance was determined to be 0.3%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical and construction materials studies · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Institute for Physical Infrastructure and Transportation (IPIT), University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.16510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.165 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10262910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102629 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10292710.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102927 ↗
4. Al-Qadi I. Fini E. Masson J.-F. 2008. Prediction of bonding characteristics of hot-poured bituminous sealants to aggregates. In: International ISAP symposium on asphalt pavements and environment Zurich Switzerland https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/accepted/?id=50c57b47-67a6-4276-95ba-cd8738faaf7a.
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.11310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.113 ↗
6. Anderton, G.L., 2000. Engineering properties of resin modified pavement (RMP) for mechanistic design. No. ERDC/GL TR-00-2, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center Geotechnical Lab, Vicksburg, MS, USA, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA376263.pdf.
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000283610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002836 ↗
8. 10.1080/19648189.2016.122922710.1080/19648189.2016.1229227 ↗
9. 10.1080/10298436.2021.190423610.1080/10298436.2021.1904236 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12448710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124487 ↗
11. 10.1088/1757-899X/471/3/03206210.1088/1757-899X/471/3/032062 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.05.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.05.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12416610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124166 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12757310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127573 ↗
15. Department of Defense Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) 2019. ‘Department of Defense Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS)’ Ufgs 32 12 19.16 [Preprint].
16. 10.1680/si.13.0001010.1680/si.13.00010 ↗
17. 10.21608/auej.2020.7314610.21608/auej.2020.73146 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.064 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12656210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126562 ↗
20. 10.1680/coma.13.0000310.1680/coma.13.00003 ↗
21. 10.3390/app1115670010.3390/app11156700 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2021.192557610.1080/14680629.2021.1925576 ↗
23. 10.1080/19648189.2018.151769710.1080/19648189.2018.1517697 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11679410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116794 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11919610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119196 ↗
26. 10.1080/10298436.2015.102446710.1080/10298436.2015.1024467 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma1416440610.3390/ma14164406 ↗
28. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.509.2610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.509.26 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.599.36110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.599.361 ↗
30. 10.3390/ma1515546610.3390/ma15155466 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000085210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000852 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12578210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125782 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2018.147929010.1080/14680629.2018.1479290 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.17710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.177 ↗
35. Masson, F.A., et al., 2007. A New blister test to measure bond strength of asphaltic materials. Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 76, 1–29.
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12027410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120274 ↗
37. Oliveira J. Thom N.H. and Zoorob S.E 2006. Fracture and fatigue strength of grouted macadams. 10th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements Quebec Canada https://www.academia.edu/download/88414985/JO_ICAP2006_20-_20Oliveira_20et_20al.pdf.
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:1(7)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:1(7) ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.011 ↗
40. 10.3390/coatings1212193410.3390/coatings12121934 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijin.2021.07.00110.1016/j.ijin.2021.07.001 ↗
42. 10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_1510.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_15 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0085310.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00853 ↗
44. Standard C. 2011. ‘Standard test methods of bitumen and bituminous mixtures for highway engineering’ JTG E20; Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing China [Preprint].
45. 10.2991/cmfe-15.2015.12410.2991/cmfe-15.2015.124 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12488410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124884 ↗
47. 10.1155/2021/885556510.1155/2021/8855565 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12468610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124686 ↗
49. 10.1155/2018/825234710.1155/2018/8252347 ↗
50. 10.1520/JTE2012006010.1520/JTE20120060 ↗
51. 10.3390/coatings1110123110.3390/coatings11101231 ↗
52. 10.3390/coatings1003026810.3390/coatings10030268 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12581410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125814 ↗
54. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.71-78.109010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.71-78.1090 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12909310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129093 ↗
56. 10.1080/10298436.2021.202418710.1080/10298436.2021.2024187 ↗
57. 10.3390/ma1302034210.3390/ma13020342 ↗
58. 10.1617/s11527-015-0674-710.1617/s11527-015-0674-7 ↗
59. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2021.06.02910.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2021.06.029 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12763310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127633 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11739410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117394 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.036 ↗