journal article·2024-12-31

Appraising annual post-maintenance functional performance of asphalt roadway based on causal inference approach

Lingyun You, Nanning Guo, Zhengwu Long, Fusong Wang, Chundi Si, Aboelkasim Diab

Publisher page

Abstract

To maintain good functional pavement performance and extend the service life of asphalt pavements, the long-term performance of pavements under maintenance policies needs to be evaluated and favourable options need to be chosen based on the condition of the pavement. A major challenge in evaluating maintenance policies is to produce valid treatments for the outcome assessment under the control of uncertainty of vehicle loads and the disturbance of freeze-thaw cycles in the climatic environment. In this study, a novel causal inference approach, combining a classical causal structural model and a potential outcome model framework, is proposed to appraise the annual post-maintenance performance of four preventive preservation treatments of pavements for longitudinal cracking over a 5-year period of upkeep. Three fundamental issues were brought to our attention: detection of causal relationships prior to variables under environmental loading (identification of causal structure); obtaining direct causal effects of treatment on outcomes excluding covariates (identification of causal effects) and sensitivity analysis of causal relationships. The results show that the method can accurately evaluate the effect of preventive maintenance treatments, assess the maintenance time to cater well for the functional performance of different preventive maintenance approaches and develop appropriate maintenance strategies for pavements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behaviour and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Fahad Bin Sultan University, Tabuk, KSA

Department of Civil Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.00210.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.002 ↗
2. 10.1109/TAI.2022.315026410.1109/TAI.2022.3150264 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62129-110.1016/S0140-6736(12)62129-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.10329510.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103295 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-023-37194-510.1038/s41467-023-37194-5 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000055610.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000556 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.162 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.08610.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.086 ↗
9. 10.3141/1680-0310.3141/1680-03 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000081810.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000818 ↗
11. Gransberg D. and James D. 2006. Chip Seal Best Practices.
12. 10.1145/339388010.1145/3393880 ↗
13. 10.1109/TITS.2023.325384510.1109/TITS.2023.3253845 ↗
14. 10.3141/2235-0610.3141/2235-06 ↗
15. 10.3141/2235-0810.3141/2235-08 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11858510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118585 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.03110.1016/j.trc.2015.03.031 ↗
18. 10.1080/15732479.2013.76784210.1080/15732479.2013.767842 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:1(14)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:1(14) ↗
20. 10.1016/j.trd.2022.10318710.1016/j.trd.2022.103187 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.01410.1016/j.jcis.2022.08.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12268810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122688 ↗
23. 10.1007/s42947-021-00078-210.1007/s42947-021-00078-2 ↗
24. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89331810.1080/10298436.2014.893318 ↗
25. 10.1080/15732479.2016.121290110.1080/15732479.2016.1212901 ↗
26. 10.1177/036119811876741710.1177/0361198118767417 ↗
27. 10.1111/0885-9507.0011310.1111/0885-9507.00113 ↗
28. 10.1214/09-SS05710.1214/09-SS057 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12490510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124905 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.01910.1016/j.trd.2015.09.019 ↗
31. 10.3390/su1203105710.3390/su12031057 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41586-022-05322-810.1038/s41586-022-05322-8 ↗
33. 10.1037/h003735010.1037/h0037350 ↗
34. 10.1198/01621450400000188010.1198/016214504000001880 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.aei.2021.10143510.1016/j.aei.2021.101435 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000056310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000563 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11709-016-0369-310.1007/s11709-016-0369-3 ↗
38. 10.1111/mice.1255810.1111/mice.12558 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.02110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.021 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.058 ↗
41. 10.1061/9780784483183.01410.1061/9780784483183.014 ↗
42. You, Z and You, L, 2020. Is seal coating counterproductive or not St. Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Transportation, 1–97. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57608.
43. 10.1016/j.trc.2022.10362210.1016/j.trc.2022.103622 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tra.2022.01.00410.1016/j.tra.2022.01.004 ↗