Flexural behaviour evaluation on foamed bitumen stabilised pavement beams using fibre optic sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of both distributed fibre optics sensors (DFOs), and fibre Bragg grating sensors (FBGs) to acquire an accurate measurement of the flexural strain of foamed bitumen stabilised (FBS) beams and to assess the material behaviour under both static and dynamic loading conditions. The beams were equipped with DFOs, FBGs and a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) to perform the static and dynamic flexural tests using a four-point bending apparatus. The initial plastic flexural strain progression of both top and bottom faces of the beam specimen under different test conditions, including different load pulse shapes and rest periods were evaluated. The results revealed that both haversine-upward and haversine-downward pulse shapes lead to a significant amount of plastic flexural strain compared to that evolved through sinusoidal pulse shapes. However, the plastic flexural strain under haversine pulse shapes can be minimised by introducing a rest period at certain cycle intervals. Further, the flexural strain profile captured by DFOs during the static and dynamic flexural tests indicated the capacity of DFOs to detect cracks initiation and propagation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Australia
Australian Road Research Board (ARRB), Port Melbourne, Australia
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council · Monash University
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 1012.11, A, 2000. Methods of testing concrete method 11:Determination of the modulus of rupture.Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.
2. 1289.3.3.1, A, 2009. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes.Method 3.3.1: Soil classification tests calculation of the plasticity index of a soil.Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.
3. 1289.5.2.1, A, 2003. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes.Method 5.2.1: Soil compaction and density tests-determination of the dry density/moisture content relation of a soil using modified compactive effort.
4. 5101.4, A, 2008. Methods for preparation and testing of stabilized materials.Method 4: Unconfined compressive strength of compacted materials.Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.
5. 12697-26:2018, B. E, 2018. Bituminus mixtures. Test methods. Stiffness. BSI.
6. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
7. AGPT/T302, 2017. Austroad test method.Mixing of foamed Bitumen stabilised material.
8. AGPT-T305, 2017. Austroads test method.Resilient modulus of foamed Bitumen stabilised materials.Sydney, Australia.
9. Alderson, A., 2011. Fatigue properties of Bitumen/lime stabilized materials- summary report. City of Canning.
10. Arooran, S.et al., 2015 Development of new mechanistic pavement design approach for cement stabilized bases. Conference: International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering (ICGE). Colombo, Sri Lanka.
11. AS1289.3.1.1, 2009. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes.Soil classification tests- Determination of the liquid limit of a soil- Four point casagrande method.
12. AS1289.3.2.1, 2009. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes method.Method 3.2.1: Soil classification tests determination of the plastic limit of a soil standard method.Standards Australia, Sydney, Australia.
13. AS1289.3.4.1, 2008. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes.Soil classification tests- Determination of the linear shinkage of a soil- Standard mehtod.
14. AsphaltAcademy, 2002. The design and use of foamed Bitumen treated materials.TG2.Pretoria, South Africa: Asphalt Academy.
15. Austroads, 2011. Review of structural design procedures for foamed bitumen pavements.In:Gonzales, A. (ed.). Sydney: Austroads.
16. Bao, X., Ravet, F., and Zou, L., Distributed Brillouin sensor based on Brillouin scattering for structural health monitoring. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2006 and the 2006 National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference. OFC 2006, 2006. IEEE, 3 pp.
17. Butler L.J. · Construction and Building Materials · 2016 · 126 · 89410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.086 ↗
18. C78, A, 2002. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). ASTM International, United States.
19. Canestrari F. · 2015
20. 10.1007/s13349-017-0236-510.1007/s13349-017-0236-5 ↗
21. D6931-17, A, 2017. Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of asphalt mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
22. Ge Y. · Construction and Building Materials · 2014 · 70 · 27910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.102 ↗
23. 10.1117/12.73493110.1117/12.734931 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6079-8_410.1007/978-1-4757-6079-8_4 ↗
25. Jameson, G., 2018. Design and performance of foamed bitumen stabilised pavements’. Austroads Technical Report. Austroads, Sydney. 310 p.
26. 10.3390/infrastructures402003610.3390/infrastructures4020036 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(116)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(116) ↗
28. Leek, C., 2011. Review of the performance of in-situ foamed bitumen stabilised pavements in the city of Canning. Proceedings of the international conference on advances in geotechnical engineering. Australian Geomechanics Society, 407–414.
29. 10.1617/s11527-013-0201-710.1617/s11527-013-0201-7 ↗
30. Madabhushi S. · Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice · 2015 · 6 · 0401401410.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000189 ↗
31. Mandal T. · Geotechnical Testing Journal · 2015 · 39 · 9110.1520/GTJ20140281 ↗
32. 10.1080/1029843070155121910.1080/10298430701551219 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.26710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.267 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-3-030-01908-2_910.1007/978-3-030-01908-2_9 ↗
35. Rowe G. · Asphalt Paving Technology · 1993 · 62 · 344
36. Rowe G.M. · 1996
37. Selker J.S. · Water Resources Research · 2006 · 42 · 110.1029/2006WR005326 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.027 ↗
39. Tangella, S.R.et al., 1990. Summary report on fatigue response of asphalt mixtures. Report No. SHRP-A-312, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkley.
40. Valentin J. · Materials and Infrastructures · 2014 · 2 · 1
41. 10.1080/10298436.2016.121187210.1080/10298436.2016.1211872 ↗
42. Yeo, R., 2012.The performance of cemented pavement materials under heavy axle loading. Thesis (PhD). Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
43. Zhou Z. · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · 2012 · 28 · 3610.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.003 ↗