Integrated Approach to Modelling the Reliability of Gears in Ship Propulsion Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
The operational reliability of gears in ship propulsion systems is an important factor affecting safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness in ship operation. Gear failures may result in loss of propulsion, increased maintenance costs, and risks to crew safety. This paper presents an integrated methodological framework for assessing gear reliability in ship propulsion systems by integrating qualitative causal analysis, quantitative reliability growth modelling, and system dynamics simulation. The analysis is based on empirical data collected from the AMOS computerised maintenance management system for ship propulsion gear over the course of 20,000 operating hours. The Ishikawa diagram is applied as a qualitative tool to structure potential failure causes related to human, technical, material, procedural, measurement, and environmental factors. Using a system dynamics approach, a qualitative conceptual model of cause-and-effect relationships and a quantitative simulation model were developed, where the mathematical model of Goel–Okumoto reliability growth was applied to quantitatively describe the process of detecting and eliminating failures, with an exponential decrease in failure intensity over time and a high level of agreement with empirical data (R2 = 0.9962), corresponding to the part of the bathtub curve related to the running-in of ship systems. The system dynamics simulation implemented in the POWERSIM environment integrates the analytically estimated model parameters and provides a dynamic representation of the relationships between failure intensity, cumulative failures, reliability, and the mean time between failures. The scientific contribution of this work lies in the structured integration of established methods into a single analytical framework, enabling coherent interpretation of empirical reliability data under real operating conditions. The results provide a methodological basis for developing predictive maintenance tools, optimising maintenance strategies, and improving the safety of ship propulsion systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia
Funding
University of Dubrovnik · European Union
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Reliability Methods in Maintenance and Failure Analysis of Marine Systems10.7307/ptt.v37i3.1065 ↗
2. Gear transmission in the ship propulsion system
3. Vizentin, G., Vukelic, G., Murawski, L., Recho, N., and Orovic, J. (2020). Marine Propulsion System Failures—A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8090662 ↗
4. Failure Analysis of Gear10.1016/S1350-6307(01)00010-3 ↗
5. Influence of Water Contamination in Gear Lubricants on Wear and Micropitting Performance of Case Carburized Gears10.1108/ILT-07-2016-0152 ↗
6. Tribology Technologies for Gears in Loss of Lubrication Conditions: A Review10.1186/s40712-024-00204-5 ↗
7. Prediction of Micropitting Damage in Gear Teeth Contacts Considering the Concurrent Effects of Surface Fatigue and Mild Wear
8. Surface Initiated Tooth Flank Damage: Part I: Numerical Model
9. Concli, F., Maccioni, L., Fraccaroli, L., and Cappellini, C. (2022). Effect of Gear Design Parameters on Stress Histories Induced by Different Tooth Bending Fatigue Tests: A Numerical-Statistical Investigation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12083950 ↗
10. Rausand, M., Barros, A., and Høyland, A. (2020). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, Wiley.10.1002/9781119373940 ↗
11. Modarres, M., Kaminskiy, M.P., and Krivtsov, V.V. (2016). Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis: A Practical Guide, CRC Press. [3rd ed.].10.1201/9781315382425 ↗
12. How To Analyze Gear Failures10.1007/BF02715492 ↗
13. Crack Growth Modelling in Spur Gear Tooth and Its Effect on Mesh Stiffness Using Extended Finite Element Method10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.07.032 ↗
14. Gear Fatigue Crack Prognosis Using Embedded Model, Gear Dynamic Model and Fracture Mechanics10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.06.007 ↗
15. A Computational Model for Determination of Service Life of Gears10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00024-5 ↗
16. Failure investigation of a marine diesel engine timing gear10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104203 ↗
17. Effects of lubrication on gear performance: A review10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103701 ↗
18. (2025, December 10). Damage to Gears. Available online: https://khkgears.net/new/gear_knowledge/gear_technical_reference/damage_to_gears.html.
19. Gear lubrication—A review10.1243/135065002760364804 ↗
20. Failure analysis of a crane gear shaft10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.182 ↗
21. A micro-pitting model for spur gear contacts10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.015 ↗
22. Detection and diagnosis of gear-tooth pitting damage by the Average-Log-Ratio ALR algorithm10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109911 ↗
23. Influence of running-in on surface characteristics of efficiency tested ground gears10.1016/j.triboint.2017.05.018 ↗
24. A review of vibration-based gear wear monitoring and prediction techniques10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109605 ↗
25. Effect of gear misalignment on contact area: Theoretical and experimental studies10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.070 ↗
26. Time-Dependent Error-Detection Rate Model for Software Reliability10.1109/TR.1979.5220566 ↗
27. Superposed Poisson Process Models with a Modified Bathtub Intensity Function for Repairable Systems10.1080/24725854.2020.1820630 ↗
28. Pei, J., Tian, Y., Hou, H., Tao, Y., Wu, M., and Wang, L. (2025). Lubrication Reliability and Evolution Laws of Gear Transmission Considering Uncertainty Parameters. Lubricants, 13.10.3390/lubricants13090392 ↗
29. Maláková, S., Puškár, M., Frankovský, P., Sivák, S., and Harachová, D. (2021). Influence of the Shape of Gear Wheel Bodies in Marine Engines on the Gearing Deformation and Meshing Stiffness. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9101060 ↗
30. Islam, R., and Martin, S. (2025). A Reliability Assessment of a Vessel’s Main Propulsion Engine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.20944/preprints202505.0059.v1 ↗
31. Ishikawa, K. (1986). Guide to Quality Control, Asian Productivity Organization.
32. Andersen, B., and Fagerhaug, T. (2006). Root Cause Analysis: Simplified Tools and Techniques, ASQ Quality Press.
33. (2026, January 07). American Society for Quality—ASQ, Cause and Effect Diagram (Fishbone). Available online: https://asq.org/quality-resources/fishbone.
34. Jurjević, M. (2009). Simulation Modelling of Technical System Reliability by Application of System Dynamics. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Split].
35. Jurjević, M. (2024). Simulation Model of Hydraulic System States for Ship Cranes. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12071218 ↗
36. Reliability Estimation of Technical System Using Markov Models and System Dynamics
37. Mobley, R.K. (2002). An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-075067531-4/50006-3 ↗
38. Meeker, W.Q., and Escobar, L.A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, Wiley.
39. (2019). Calculation of Load Capacity of Spur and Helical Gears—Part 2: Calculation of Surface Durability (Standard No. ISO 6336-2:2019).
40. Best Practices for Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Implementation in Complex Manufacturing Environments
41. Maintenance Practices and Parameters for Marine Mechanical Systems: A Review10.1108/JQME-03-2019-0026 ↗
42. Reliability assessment of main engine subsystems considering turbocharger failure as a case study10.12716/1001.12.02.06 ↗
43. Reliability maintenance aspects of deck machinery for ageing/aged fishing vessels10.1080/20464177.2019.1663595 ↗