Rutting-resistance investigation of amorphous carbon powder modified binder and asphalt mixture containing siliceous aggregates
Source abstract
Abstract
Amorphous carbon powder (ACP), an industrial waste material, is a potential asphalt binder modifier. In this study, the effect of ACP on the rutting performance of asphalt binders and mixtures was investigated. For this purpose, the frequency sweep, and multiple stress creep recovery tests of asphalt binders and resilient modulus, dynamic creep, and wheel tracking tests of asphalt mixtures were conducted on asphalt binders and mixtures containing 3, 5, and 10% of ACP by weight of total asphalt binder. The results showed that using 10% ACP caused a substantial improvement in the rutting parameter of asphalt binders, and the non-recoverable creep compliance values at both 0.1 and 3.2 kPa stress levels decrease by about 80% when modified with 10% ACP. The asphalt mixture results indicated that the indirect tensile strength, wheel tracking, and resilient modulus at 25 ℃ enhanced by about 25%, 43%, and 40%, respectively when 10% ACP modified asphalt binder was used. Therefore, in addition to being a positive action in environmental protection, modifying asphalt binders with 10% ACP can improve the high-temperature performance of asphalt binders and mixtures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO-M332-14 2015. Performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test.
2. 10.11113/jt.v73.429110.11113/jt.v73.4291 ↗
3. Anderson, R., Christensen, D., and Bonaquist, R., 2003. Estimating the rutting potential of asphalt mixtures using superpave gyratory compaction properties and indirect tensile strength (with discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72, 1–26.
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.127 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(553)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(553) ↗
6. ASTMD5892, 2000. Standard specification for type IV polymer-modified asphalt cement for use in pavement construction. ASTM International.
7. 10.1080/14680629.2019.168700710.1080/14680629.2019.1687007 ↗
8. 10.1177/036119819615450012110.1177/0361198196154500121 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.09110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.091 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.06710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.067 ↗
11. Garba R. 2002. Permanent deformation properties of asphalt concrete mixtures.
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.14310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.143 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2015.106353310.1080/14680629.2015.1063533 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.004 ↗
15. 10.1080/10298436.2021.190580910.1080/10298436.2021.1905809 ↗
16. 10.1080/1029843060081917010.1080/10298430600819170 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.13710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.137 ↗
18. Javid, M. and Rahim, A., 2016. Characterization of visco-elastic properties of locally available asphalts in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 9 (2011), 17–23.
19. Kandhal, P. S, 1993. Waste materials in hot mix asphalt – an overview. Use of waste materials in hot-mix asphalt. ASTM International.
20. 10.1080/10916466.2017.131673510.1080/10916466.2017.1316735 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659) ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.17910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.179 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11828010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118280 ↗
24. 10.1080/1029843090325529610.1080/10298430903255296 ↗
25. 10.1201/978148226771610.1201/9781482267716 ↗
26. 10.1080/14680629.2018.146584210.1080/14680629.2018.1465842 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.01110.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12225810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122258 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.07810.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.078 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000297610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002976 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00362-410.1016/S0304-3894(01)00362-4 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000110210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001102 ↗
33. Read, J. and Whiteoak, D., 2003. The shell bitumen handbook. Fifth Edition London: Thomas Telford.
34. Roberts, F. L., et al., 1991. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction. Lanham, Maryland: NAPA Research and Education Foundation.
35. 10.1080/10916466.2016.123075510.1080/10916466.2016.1230755 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.08310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.083 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0050410.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00504 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.014 ↗
39. Witzcak, M. W, 2002. Simple performance test for superpave mix design. Transportation Research Board.
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.088 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.009 ↗
42. 10.11113/jt.v78.950310.11113/jt.v78.9503 ↗
43. 10.1504/IJGENVI.2012.04938210.1504/IJGENVI.2012.049382 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.036 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.039 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11701510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117015 ↗
47. 10.1155/2017/631969710.1155/2017/6319697 ↗