journal article·2017-01-02

A comparison between three approaches for modelling deterioration of five pavement surfaces

Rayya Hassan, Oliver Lin, Amutha Thananjeyan

Publisher page

Abstract

Reported in this paper are the process and outcomes of deterioration modelling for five types of pavement bituminous surfacing for use in identifying and prioritising resurfacing needs. Surface condition data is collected using subjective assessment surveys and the condition ratings of distresses are combined into a single measure referred to as surface inspection rating (SIR). Deterioration models of SIR as a function of surface age are developed for the five networks using three modelling approaches. They include regression analysis, logistic regression analysis and Markov chains. A comparison between the output models of the three approaches is presented and assessed in terms of predictions reasonableness and accuracy considering their closeness to actual data and practical local experience and engineering judgement. Overall the findings indicate that the three modelling approaches provide similar predictions and deterioration rates for most surfacing types. A comparison of performance between the five networks is also presented.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Butt A. · 1994
2. 10.3141/1524-1210.3141/1524-12 ↗
3. 10.1680/tran.2005.158.4.20310.1680/tran.2005.158.4.203 ↗
4. De Melo e Silva F. · Transportation Research Record · 2000 · 1699 · 0010.3141/1699-11 ↗
5. Duke University (DU), 2014. Regression analysis. http://people.duke.edu/(rnau/regnotes.htm [Accessed February 2014].
6. HenningT.F.P., CostelloS.B., and WatsonT.G., 2006. A review of the HDM/dTIMS pavement models based on calibration site data. Wellington, New Zealand: Land Transport New Zealand.
7. Kamalesh P. · 2009
8. Kaur D. · WSEAS Transactions on Information Science & Applications · 2008 · 5 · 979
9. Li N. · 1998
10. LiZ. and ZhangZ., A probabilistic and adaptive approach to modelling performance of pavement infrastructure. Austin, TX: Southwest Region University Transportation Centre, Centre for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, Research Report SWUTC/07/167267-1.
11. Lin O. · 2014
12. PatersonW.O.D., 1987. Road deterioration and maintenance effects: models for planning and management. Baltimore: Published for the World Bank by the Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. RIMES, 1999. Road Infrastructure Maintenance Evaluation Study Pavement and Structure Management System; Project for EC-DG-VII RTD Programme - Contract No. RO-97-SC 1085/1189 Work Package 3. Network Level Management Model.
14. Uchwat C. · 2012
15. VicRoads, 2004. Surface inspection rating procedure for pavements surfaced with sprayed seals and asphalt. Melbourne/Australia: VicRoads.
16. WuenschK.L., 2011. Binary logistic regression with PASW/SPSS. http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/MV/Multreg/Logistic-SPSS.pdf [Accessed February 2014].