journal article·2021-11-10

Analysis of roughness performance of chloride-stabilised rural roads

Alelí Osorio-Lird, Alondra Chamorro, Álvaro González

Publisher page

Abstract

Rural roads play a crucial role in the economic and social development of societies. Therefore, they should be managed accordingly and supported by consistent public policies and suitable management practices. Maintenance requirements and costs depend upon the desired serviceability expected for the prevailing traffic, which can be estimated from the road roughness. Given the increasing use of chloride stabilisers to improve the service level of rural roads, it is crucial to objectively assess the performance of these roads over time to perform life-cycle cost analyses for effective management. The objective of this study was to assess the roughness of chloride-stabilised rural roads over time and to propose a performance model from the analysis. As a result, a model for roughness prediction of chloride-stabilised roads was developed and successfully validated, considering an exponential estimation curve based on the age of the road. The proposed model is statistically significant, considering a 95% confidence level range of IRI predicted ± 0,88 m/km. This result indicates that age provides confident information about the IRI. This model is proposed for network-level management of rural roads in terms of IRI.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ingeniería y Gestión de la Construcción, Escuela de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Funding

FONDECYT

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/15732479.2010.52422410.1080/15732479.2010.524224 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000007410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000074 ↗
3. 10.3141/2225-0410.3141/2225-04 ↗
4. ARRB G. 2011. Roughometer III.
5. Bollen, K., and Jackman, R., 1990. Regression diagnostics: an expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Modern methods of data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Fox, John; Long, J. Scott, eds.
6. Chamorro A. 2012. Development of a sustainable management system for rural road networks in developing countries. Thesis (PhD). University of Waterloo Canada.
7. 10.3141/2093-1210.3141/2093-12 ↗
8. 10.3141/2204-0310.3141/2204-03 ↗
9. 10.3141/2473-0710.3141/2473-07 ↗
10. 10.1080/01621459.1979.1048163410.1080/01621459.1979.10481634 ↗
11. de Soliminihac, H., Echaveguren, T., and Chamorro, A., 2019. Gestión de Infraestructura Vial. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Alfaomega Colombiana y Ediciones UC.
12. DGAC & DMC, 2011. Anuario Climatológico 2010. Santiago, Chile: Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil y Dirección Meteorológica de Chile.
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000073810.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000738 ↗
14. Douglas, R., 2017. Low-volume road engineering: design, construction, and maintenance. Boca Ratón: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:4(157)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:4(157) ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000018510.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000185 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.22310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.223 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.08810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.088 ↗
19. 10.3141/2473-1810.3141/2473-18 ↗
20. 10.1177/036119810619740010210.1177/0361198106197400102 ↗
21. 10.1080/10298436.2015.103074410.1080/10298436.2015.1030744 ↗
22. Hudson, W.R., Haas, R., and Daryl, R., 1979. NCHRP 215. Pavement management System development. Washington, USA: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:8(623)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:8(623) ↗
24. 10.3141/2155-1410.3141/2155-14 ↗
25. Kezdi, A., 1979. Stabilized earth roads, Elsevier cientific Publishing Company. New York, USA: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
26. Khan, M. and Higgins, P., 2015. A comprehensive analysis for obtaining consistent HDM-4 results: case study with a local Council in Australia. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 8 (2), 123–130.
27. Khurshid M.B. et al. 2014. A Framework for Assessing the Consequences of Deferred or Hastened Highway Asset Interventions.10.1080/15732479.2013.875046 ↗
28. 10.3141/2108-0310.3141/2108-03 ↗
29. Lebo, J. and Schelling, D., 2000. Design and appraisal of rural transport infrastructure, ensuring basic access for the rural communities. Washington, USA: World Bank, Technical Paper No. No 496.
30. Linda, L.P. and Rabinson, R., 1982. The TRRL road Investment model for developing countries (RTIM2). Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Laboratory Report 1057.
31. 10.1023/A:100892952601110.1023/A:1008929526011 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000068210.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000682 ↗
33. 10.3141/1989-4810.3141/1989-48 ↗
34. MOP 2016. Unpaved road inventory-Ministerio de Obras Públicas.
35. 10.3141/2204-1910.3141/2204-19 ↗
36. MWH and World Bank 2005. Surfacing Alternatives for Unsealed Rural Roads. Report sponsored by the Transport and Rural Infrastructure Services Partnership (TRISP). Auckland New Zealand: MWH New Zealand Ltd. and World Bank TRISP-DFID/ World Bank Partnership.
37. Odoki, J.B. and Kerali, H.R.G., 2006. Analytical framework and model descriptions – volume 4 of highway development and management series. Paris: International Study of Highway Development and Management (ISOHDM), World Road Association PIARC.
38. Osorio-Lird A. 2015. Development of performance models and maintenance Standards of Urban pavements for network management. Thesis (PhD). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile & Universidad of Waterloo Canada.
39. 10.1080/15732479.2017.140206410.1080/15732479.2017.1402064 ↗
40. 10.3141/2455-0410.3141/2455-04 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:12(706)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:12(706) ↗
42. Pidwirny M. and Jones S. 2010. Fundamentals of Physical Geography ebook.
43. 10.3141/1989-0110.3141/1989-01 ↗
44. 10.1596/978-0-8213-8214-110.1596/978-0-8213-8214-1 ↗
45. Radović, N., et al., 2016. A measurement of roughness as indicator of road network condition – case study Serbia. Hrčak, ID: 160148, 23 (3), 881–884.
46. 10.3141/2474-1110.3141/2474-11 ↗
47. SADC (Southern African Development Community), 2003. Low-volume sealed roads guidelines. Gaborone, Botswana: Gaborone, Southern African Development Community.
48. 10.1080/10298436.2012.70332210.1080/10298436.2012.703322 ↗
49. 10.3141/1699-1110.3141/1699-11 ↗
50. Stone B. et al. 2014. Regression analysis: how to Interpret S the standard Error of the regression. The Minitab Blog.
51. TAC, 2013. Pavement asset design and management guide. Ontario, Canada: Transportation Association of Canada.
52. 10.1080/10298436.2011.60632010.1080/10298436.2011.606320 ↗
53. 10.3141/1989-4910.3141/1989-49 ↗
54. 10.4995/Thesis/10251/4887810.4995/Thesis/10251/48878 ↗
55. Watanatada, T., et al., 1987. The highway design and maintenance standards model - volume 1: description of the HDM-III model. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
56. 10.3141/2226-1110.3141/2226-11 ↗
57. 10.1177/036119810619740010310.1177/0361198106197400103 ↗
58. Zheng, N., Liu, G., and Jin, Y., 2013. Evaluation of tools for incorporating road user costs in pavement rehabilitation decision-making on rural highways in Saskatchewan. In: X. Yan, P. Yi, D. Zhu, L. Fu, eds. ICTIS 2013: Improving Multimodal Transportation Systems-information, safety, and Integration. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1103–1108.10.1061/9780784413036.149 ↗