The Nonlinear Dynamic Characteristics of Straddle Packer Fracturing Tool String Considering Collision Constraints
Source abstract
Abstract
The straddle packer fracturing technique represents a core technology for reservoir stimulation in horizontal wells targeting deep shale gas formations. However, the fracturing string constrained by dual packers is highly susceptible to severe vibrations induced by high-pressure pulsating fluid flow, which subsequently leads to collisions between the string and the casing. These collisions may compromise the sealing integrity of the packers or cause fatigue damage to the string. The existing design of packer spacing primarily relies on static mechanical experience and lacks the support of nonlinear dynamics theory. As a result, it is difficult to maximize operational efficiency while ensuring safety. Therefore, this paper establishes a fluid–solid coupling fracturing string model that takes into account fluid pulsation, geometric nonlinearity and gap collision constraints. Using the Galerkin discretization and the fourth-order Runge–Kutta algorithm, the influence laws of packer spacing and flow rate on the system stability are systematically studied. Studies have shown that the spacing of packers non-monotonically controls the system stability. Both too short or too long packer spacings will induce chaotic instability. However, there exists a highly robust, stable contact window near the ratio. Within this interval, the fracturing string is locked onto a stable period-doubling orbit. Based on this proposed optimization criterion, compared with the traditional conservative design, the spacing of the packers can be extended by approximately 90%. This not only avoids the risk of chaos but also significantly improves the efficiency of the fracturing operation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Ocean Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Key Laboratory of Polar Geology and Marine Mineral Resources, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Multi-stage hydraulic fracturing technology in a well with horizontal working face
2. Xue, J., Sun, Q., Wei, R., Li, W., Yu, L., Wang, W., and Liu, Y. (2026). Research on Structural Design and Plugging Laws of Knot Temporary Plugging Agent. Symmetry, 18.10.3390/sym18020211 ↗
3. Alali, E.A., Bataweel, M.A., Arias Urbina, R.E., and Bulekbay, A. (2020). Critical review of multistage fracturing completions and stimulation methods. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 2020, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 23 July 2020, SPE.10.2118/203284-MS ↗
4. Study on migration and plugging mechanism of knot temporary plugging agent in hydraulic fracturing10.1063/5.0270811 ↗
5. Comparative assessment of mechanical and chemical fluid diversion techniques during hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells10.1016/j.petsci.2023.07.013 ↗
6. Wu, L., Zhang, J., Jia, D., Wang, S., and Yan, Y. (2022). Performance evaluation of multistage fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirs at Block M, Ordos Basin. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15020613 ↗
7. Multistage Acid Stimulation Uses Straddle Packer, Real-Time Telemetry
8. Paidoussis, M.P. (2003). Fluid-Structure Interactions, Slender Structures and Axial Flow, Elsevier.
9. Fatigue failure mechanism of 3D tubing strings used in high-pressure, high-temperature and high-yield curved gas wells10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105536 ↗
10. Michael, J., and Economides, K.G.N. (2000). Reservoir Stimulation, Wiley.
11. Wu, B., and Yang, D. (2022). Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing, Wiley.
12. Unstable oscillation of tubular cantilevers conveying fluid II. Experiments
13. Bifurcations to divergence and flutter in flow-induced oscillations: A finite dimensional analysis10.1016/0022-460X(77)90521-1 ↗
14. The non-linear equations of motion of pipes conveying fluid10.1006/jsvi.1994.1035 ↗
15. Pipes conveying fluid: A model dynamical problem10.1006/jfls.1993.1011 ↗
16. A further study on the non-linear dynamics of simply supported pipes conveying pulsating fluid10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.08.010 ↗
17. Mitchell, R.F., and Weltzin, T. (2011). Lateral buckling–the key to lockup. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1–3 March 2011, SPE.10.2118/139824-MS ↗
18. Helical buckling of tubing sealed in packers10.2118/178-PA ↗
19. Buckling behavior of well tubing: The packer effect10.2118/9264-PA ↗
20. Dynamic stability of lateral vibration of a tubing string in flowing production10.21595/jve.2018.18989 ↗
21. Study on water hammer effect and tubing string vibration in high-pressure high-production gas wells10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212147 ↗
22. Bi-nonlinear vibration model of tubing string in oil & gas well and its experimental verification10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.057 ↗
23. Response analysis and safety control of tubing vibration in HPHT and ultra-deep gas wells10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111118 ↗
24. Mechanical and mathematical models of multi-stage horizontal fracturing strings and their application10.1016/j.ngib.2015.07.009 ↗
25. Non-smooth dynamics of impacting viscoelastic pipes conveying pulsatile fluid10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108040 ↗
26. On internal resonances in pipes conveying pulsating fluid for beam, stretched-beam, and string models10.1007/s11071-024-10778-6 ↗
27. Nonlinear impacting oscillations of a fluid-conveying pipe subjected to distributed motion constraints10.1007/s11071-015-2038-9 ↗
28. Nonlinear and chaotic oscillations of a constrained cantilevered pipe conveying fluid: A full nonlinear analysis10.1007/BF00162236 ↗
29. Convergence of the Galerkin method for nonlinear dynamics of the continuous structure10.15377/2409-5761.2014.01.02.3 ↗
30. Stability and Chaotic Vibrations of a Fluid-Conveying Pipe with Additional Combined Constraints10.1017/S1727719100003622 ↗
31. Nonlinear dynamics of imperfectly-supported pipes conveying fluid10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102850 ↗
32. Dynamics of cantilevered pipes conveying fluid. Part 1: Nonlinear equations of three-dimensional motion10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.10.006 ↗
33. Dumitrache, L., Roy, A., Bird, A., Goktas, B., Sorgi, C., Stanley, R., De Gennaro, V., Eswein, E., and Abbott, J. (2022). A multidisciplinary approach to production optimization through hydraulic fracturing stimulation and geomechanical modelling in Clair Field. Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2022, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 21–23 February 2022, SPE.10.2523/IPTC-22293-MS ↗
34. A periodically forced piecewise linear oscillator10.1016/0022-460X(83)90407-8 ↗
35. Dynamics of a two degree of freedom vibro-impact system with multiple motion limiting constraints10.1142/S0218127404009223 ↗