journal article·2026-02-27Open access

Morphological Variation in the Mandibular Ramus in Different Skeletal Characteristics: A Dual Radiographic Analysis

Wafa Omar Ali Dabwan, K. Müfide Dinçer, R. Lale Taner

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 5

Abstract

Background: Lateral cephalometry is the reference standard for two-dimensional dentoskeletal analysis; however, superimposition limits bilateral mandibular assessment in asymmetric conditions. Panoramic radiography provides bilateral visualization with lower radiation exposure, but its reliability remains debated. This study evaluated the agreement between panoramic and cephalometric angular measurements and assessed mandibular variations according to skeletal class, vertical pattern, and sex. Methods: Standardized panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs of 304 adults (18–30 years) were analyzed. Corresponding angular measurements were compared using correlation and regression analyses, and subgroup differences were evaluated across skeletal classifications and sex. Results: Significant correlations were found between selected parameters, particularly Ar-Go-Me and OMAND (r = 0.52) and FH/U6-U1 and FH/UOP (r = 0.66). However, regression analyses showed moderate explanatory power. Mandibular dimensions were significantly greater in males, and Class III hyperdivergent individuals exhibited steeper angular patterns. Conclusions: Panoramic radiography can approximate certain cephalometric angles and may serve as an adjunctive diagnostic tool. However, due to limited predictive accuracy, it cannot replace cephalometric analysis for definitive orthodontic treatment planning. Mandibular morphology is strongly influenced by vertical skeletal pattern and sex.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University, Kutlu Adali Blv, KKTC via Mersin 10, 99750 Morphou, Turkey

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cyprus International University, 99258 KKTC Mersin, Turkey

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Cephalometric analysis: History and clinical application10.38209/2708-2636.1323 ↗
2. Comparison of orthopantomogram and lateral cephalogram for mandibular measurements10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_98_17 ↗
3. Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.93 ↗
4. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of adult patients with Class I malocclusion10.2334/josnusd.51.425 ↗
5. Severe open bite due to traumatic condylar fractures treated nonsurgically with implanted miniscrew anchorage10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.024 ↗
6. Accuracy of gonial angle measurements using panoramic imaging versus Lateral Cephalograms in adults with different mandibular divergence patterns10.2147/JMDH.S463688 ↗
7. Zulfiqar, M.F., Zulfiqar, K., Bashir, U., Luqman, U., and Rizwan, Z. (2024). Comparison Of Orthopantomogram and Lateral Cephalogram for Gonial Angle, Mandibular Ramus Height And Body Length. J. Rawalpindi Med. Coll., 28.10.37939/jrmc.v28i2.2389 ↗
8. Panoramic radiographs: A tool for investigating skeletal pattern10.1067/mod.2003.3 ↗
9. Assessment of antero-posterior skeletal relationships in adult Korean patients in the natural head position and centric relation10.4041/kjod.2010.40.6.421 ↗
10. Culicoides and the global epidemiology of bluetongue virus infection
11. Chen, G., Al Awadi, M., Chambers, D.W., Lagravère-Vich, M.O., Xu, T., and Oh, H. (2020). The three-dimensional stable mandibular landmarks in patients between the ages of 12.5 and 17.1 years. BMC Oral Health, 20.10.1186/s12903-020-01142-2 ↗
12. A method of cephalometric evaluation10.1016/S0002-9416(84)90352-X ↗
13. Determining mandibular condyle and ramus height with the help of an Orthopantomogram®–a valid method?10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00870.x ↗
14. Stăncioiu, A.-A., Motofelea, A.C., Hușanu, A.A., Vasica, L., Nagib, R., Popa, A., and Szuhanek, C. (2025). Associations of Digital Measurements: Analysis of Orthopantomography Versus Lateral Cephalograms for Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry. J. Clin. Med., 14.10.20944/preprints202501.1581.v1 ↗
15. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: Mandibular linear dimensions and angles10.1016/0889-5406(86)90026-0 ↗
16. Retrospective study: Evaluating the positioning errors in digital panoramic radiographs10.37506/ijocd.v10i2.18413 ↗
17. Izzetti, R., Nisi, M., Aringhieri, G., Crocetti, L., Graziani, F., and Nardi, C. (2021). Basic knowledge and new advances in panoramic radiography imaging techniques: A narrative review on what dentists and radiologists should know. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11177858 ↗
18. İbIşoğlu, G.N., and Uslu-Akcam, O. (2025). Is there a relationship between mandibular third molar impaction and mandibular morphology?. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-06131-x ↗
19. Adjunctive radiograph diagnostic in vertical mandibular asymmetry10.20473/j.djmkg.v54.i1.p21-24 ↗
20. Kotuła, J., Kuc, A.E., Lis, J., Kawala, B., and Sarul, M. (2022). New sagittal and vertical cephalometric analysis methods: A systematic review. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12071723 ↗
21. Three-dimensional cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial morphology in Korean population utilizing cone-beam computed tomography10.4041/kjod24.279 ↗
22. Ramus Height and its relationship with skeletal and dental measurements10.12816/0012186 ↗
23. Craniofacial skeletal and soft tissue morphology in Icelandic adults10.1093/ejo/26.3.245 ↗
24. Analysis of facial skeletal morphology: Nasal bone, maxilla, and mandible10.1155/2021/5599949 ↗
25. Gonial angle characteristics of class iii malocclusion in javanese ethnic10.1590/pboci.2021.051 ↗
26. D’Antò, V., Madariaga, A.C.P., Rongo, R., Bucci, R., Simeon, V., Franchi, L., and Valletta, R. (2019). Distribution of the condylion-gonion-menton (cogome^) angle in a population of patients from southern Italy. Dent. J., 7.10.3390/dj7040104 ↗
27. Diagnosis and treatment planning via roentgenographic cephalometry10.1016/0002-9416(58)90003-4 ↗
28. Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions10.1016/0002-9416(64)90039-9 ↗
29. Growth and development of the middle face10.1177/00220345630420014601 ↗
30. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment
31. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types10.4103/0976-237X.86458 ↗
32. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Mandibular Morphology Across Vertical Facial Growth Patterns Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
33. 3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study10.1111/ocr.12677 ↗
34. Gonial angle by lateral cephalogram in orthodontic patients of a tertiary care hospital: A descriptive cross-sectional study
35. Computer-aided modeling in the assessment of the biomechanical determinants of diverse skeletal patterns10.1016/0002-9416(86)90068-0 ↗
36. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth10.1016/0002-9416(69)90034-7 ↗
37. Relationship between craniofacial skeletal patterns and anatomic characteristics of masticatory muscles: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s40510-024-00534-2 ↗
38. Correlation of masticatory muscle activity and occlusal function with craniofacial morphology: A prospective cohort study10.1007/s00784-023-05156-2 ↗