Prediction of differential drying shrinkage of airport concrete pavement slabs
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, strain gages were installed at the centre, edge, and corner of concrete pavement slabs of Incheon International Airport based on the slab depth, whereas thermometers were positioned at the slab centre to measure the slab behaviour according to the temperature change. A three-dimensional finite element model simulating the airport concrete pavement was generated, and the analysis was conducted by using the measured temperature and material properties as functions of the concrete age and slab depth as its input variables. The difference between the measured strain and predicted thermal strain was calculated as the drying shrinkage because the finite element analysis did not consider the moisture evaporation but rather only the temperature change. The calculated drying shrinkage was large near the top of the slab from where the moisture evaporated, and the differential drying shrinkage between the top and bottom of the slab increased until the concrete age of nearly one month. Consequently, an upward curling developed owing to the differential drying shrinkage. The upward curling was the most obvious at the slab corner because the position was more exposed to ambient air and less constrained than at other positions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea
R&D Center, SAMWOO IMC CO. LTD, Seoul, South Korea
Pacific Department, Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 209 · 2008
2. Ali O. · 2005
3. ARA, Inc. · 2004
4. ASTM, 2009. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A615/A615M-09b, American Society for Testing and Materials, PA, USA.
5. ASTM · 2016
6. Eisenmann J. · 1990
7. FAA · 2016
8. 10.3141/1809-0510.3141/1809-05 ↗
9. Incheon International Airport Corporation, 2015. AIRSIDE pavement evaluation. Final Report, Incheon, Korea.
10. Janssen D.J. · Transportation Research Record · 1987 · 1121 · 40
11. 10.1680/tran.10.0002010.1680/tran.10.00020 ↗
12. 10.3141/1896-0710.3141/1896-07 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:2(140)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:2(140) ↗
14. Kim, Y.T., 2014. Analysis of stress in airport concrete pavement caused by double duals in tandem gear loading. Master Thesis. Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
15. KSA, 2016. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete. Korean Industrial Standards, KS F 2408, Korean Standards Association, Seoul, Korea.
16. KSA, 2017. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio in compression of cylindrical concrete specimens. Korean Industrial Standards, KS F 2438, Korean Standards Association, Seoul, Korea.
17. Park, J.Y., 2011. Development of regression model for concrete pavement slab fatigue considering environmental loading. Master Thesis. Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
18. 10.7855/IJHE.2017.19.6.06710.7855/IJHE.2017.19.6.067 ↗
19. 10.1680/macr.1951.2.6.12710.1680/macr.1951.2.6.127 ↗
20. Teller L.W. · Public Roads · 1935 · 16 · 169
21. TxDOT · 2011
22. 10.1002/suco.20150020810.1002/suco.201500208 ↗
23. 10.3141/2240-0210.3141/2240-02 ↗