The impact of dynamic effects filtration on the results of the comparative analysis performed with falling weight deflectometers
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper evaluates the influence of dynamic effects filtration incorporating the method of deflection frequency normalisation on the results of the comparative analysis of FWD dynamic instruments. The authors' calculations are based on a database comprising the results of comparative deflection tests conducted by use of six FWD instruments, on five different test sections, in strictly monitored on-site conditions. After analysing the results of deflection measurements subjected to the dynamic effects filtration procedure, it was possible to unambiguously determine the device for which the obtained deflection values differ most from the values obtained for other devices. The unequivocal selection of a device for comparative test results of FWD devices that had not been submitted to deflection frequency normalisation has not been possible. The calculations performed in the paper have confirmed the positive influence of dynamic effects filtration using the method of deflection frequency normalisation on the results of the comparative analysis of FWD devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Transport Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland
Institute of Automatic Control and Robotics, Faculty of Control, Robotics and Electrical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznań, Poland
Funding
research subvention
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. DNS, 2015. Polish guidelines for the diagnosis of the technical condition of main roads. Available from: www.gddkia.gov.pl/pl/2982/Diagnostyka-Stanu-Nawierzchni [Accessed 10.01.2019].
2. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.00110.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.001 ↗
3. GUS, 2019. Statistics Poland Unit. Available from: www.stat.gov.pl [Accessed 10.01.2019].
4. 10.3141/1806-0410.3141/1806-04 ↗
5. Haas R. · 1978
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(73)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(73) ↗
7. Lewandowski R. · Structural Engineering and Mechanics · 2017 · 63 · 181
8. Lukanen E.O. · Transportation Research Record · 1992 · 1355 · 37
9. Mejłun Ł. · Drogownictwo · 2012 · 10 · 315
10. Mejłun Ł. · Drogownictwo · 2015 · 10 · 341
11. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 2017. Pavement management systems putting data to work. Washington, The National Academies Press.
12. Nega A. · Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering · 2016 · 3 · 427
13. Pożarycki A. · Drogownictwo · 2014 · 12 · 403
14. 10.3846/13923730.2014.89798710.3846/13923730.2014.897987 ↗
15. Pożarycki A. · Drogownictwo · 2014 · 11 · 353
16. Pożarycki A. · Drogownictwo · 2017 · 1 · 13
17. 10.3311/PPci.788010.3311/PPci.7880 ↗
18. Pożarycki A. · Roads and Bridges · 2017 · 16 · 101
19. 10.1080/14680629.2017.137499110.1080/14680629.2017.1374991 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:6(618)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1985)111:6(618) ↗
21. Sudyka J. · Drogownictwo · 2012 · 6 · 207
22. Sun Y. · Materials · 2018 · 11 · 1