journal article·2026-02-25Open access

How Far Can a U-Net Go? An Empirical Analysis of Music Source Separation Performance

Daniel Kostrzewa, Mikolaj Kondziolka, Robert Brzeski, Jeremiah Abimbola, Pawel Benecki

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 5

Abstract

Music source separation (MSS) focuses on decomposing a mixed audio signal into individual instrumental components and is increasingly relevant for music production, restoration, remixing, education, and music information retrieval. Deep learning methods, particularly U-Net architectures operating on time–frequency representations, have recently advanced the state of the art beyond traditional signal-processing techniques. This work presents an optimized multi-source U-Net model for separating selected musical instruments from stereo mixtures. The system uses magnitude spectrograms generated by the short-time Fourier transform and is trained and evaluated on the MUSDB18 dataset. We systematically examine architectural and training-related factors, including normalization strategies, dropout placement, optimizer selection, loss weighting, data augmentation, and spectrogram-domain modifications. Separation quality is measured using BSS Eval metrics, assessing artifacts, interference, and distortion. Experimental results show that the proposed configuration achieves competitive performance relative to established convolutional and U-Net-based open-source systems, especially in terms of vocal track separation, offering practical insights into designing efficient models for multi-instrument separation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Speech and Audio Processing · Music and Audio Processing · Blind Source Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

Funding

statutory research funds of Department of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Blind signal separation: Statistical principles10.1109/5.720250 ↗
2. Hyvärinen, A., Hurri, J., and Hoyer, P.O. (2001). Independent component analysis. Natural Image Statistics: A Probabilistic Approach to Early Computational Vision, Springer.10.1002/0471221317 ↗
3. Smaragdis, P., Raj, B., and Shashanka, M. (2007). Supervised and semi-supervised separation of sounds from single-channel mixtures. Proceedings of the International Conference on Independent Component Analysis and Signal Separation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-74494-8_52 ↗
4. Cañadas-Quesada, F.J., FitzGerald, D., Vera-Candeas, P., and Ruiz-Reyes, N. (2017, January 5–9). Harmonic-percussive sound separation using rhythmic information from non-negative matrix factorization in single-channel music recordings. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Edinburgh, UK.
5. Repeating pattern extraction technique (REPET): A simple method for music/voice separation10.1109/TASL.2012.2213249 ↗
6. Araki, S., Ito, N., Haeb-Umbach, R., Wichern, G., Wang, Z.Q., and Mitsufuji, Y. (2025, January 6–11). 30+ years of source separation research: Achievements and future challenges. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hyderabad, India.10.1109/ICASSP49660.2025.10889006 ↗
7. A survey of audio enhancement algorithms for music, speech, bioacoustics, biomedical, industrial, and environmental sounds by image U-Net10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3344813 ↗
8. Rafii, Z., Liutkus, A., Stöter, F.R., Mimilakis, S.I., and Bittner, R. (2025, December 12). The MUSDB18 Corpus for Music Separation. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/1117372.
9. Kadandale, V.S., Montesinos, J.F., Haro, G., and Gómez, E. (2020, January 21–24). Multi-channel u-net for music source separation. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 22nd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), Tampere, Finland.10.1109/MMSP48831.2020.9287108 ↗
10. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., and Frangi, A.F. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9 ↗
11. Performance measurement in blind audio source separation10.1109/TSA.2005.858005 ↗
12. Spectral and temporal periodicity representations of rhythm for the automatic classification of music audio signal10.1109/TASL.2010.2089452 ↗
13. Combining spectral and temporal representations for multipitch estimation of polyphonic music10.1109/TASLP.2015.2442411 ↗
14. Siddique, N., Sidike, P., Elkin, C., and Devabhaktuni, V. (2020). U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: Theory and applications. arXiv.10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086020 ↗
15. Meseguer-Brocal, G., and Peeters, G. (2019). Conditioned-U-Net: Introducing a control mechanism in the U-Net for multiple source separations. arXiv.
16. Stoller, D., Ewert, S., and Dixon, S. (2018). Wave-u-net: A multi-scale neural network for end-to-end audio source separation. arXiv.
17. Spleeter: A fast and efficient music source separation tool with pre-trained models10.21105/joss.02154 ↗
18. Separation of speech & music using temporal-spectral features and neural classifiers10.1007/s12065-023-00828-0 ↗
19. Open-unmix-a reference implementation for music source separation10.21105/joss.01667 ↗
20. Takahashi, N., Goswami, N., and Mitsufuji, Y. (2018, January 17–20). Mmdenselstm: An efficient combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks for audio source separation. Proceedings of the 2018 16th International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC), Tokyo, Japan.10.1109/IWAENC.2018.8521383 ↗
21. Wang, C.H., Wang, C.C., Wang, J.Y., Jang, J.S.R., and Chu, Y.H. (2024, January 17–19). Improving Real-Time Music Accompaniment Separation with MMDenseNet. Proceedings of the 2024 27th Conference of the Oriental COCOSDA International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardisation of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA), Hsinchu, Taiwan.10.1109/O-COCOSDA64382.2024.10800743 ↗
22. Tichavský, P., Babaie-Zadeh, M., Michel, O.J., and Thirion-Moreau, N. (2017). The 2016 Signal Separation Evaluation Campaign. Proceedings of the Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation-12th International Conference, LVA/ICA 2015, Liberec,10.1007/978-3-319-53547-0 ↗
23. Czech Republic, 25-28 August 2015, Proceedings, Springer International Publishing.
24. Takahashi, N., and Mitsufuji, Y. (2020). D3net: Densely connected multidilated densenet for music source separation. arXiv.
25. Défossez, A., Usunier, N., Bottou, L., and Bach, F. (2019). Music source separation in the waveform domain. arXiv.
26. Rafii, Z., Liutkus, A., Stöter, F.R., Mimilakis, S.I., and Bittner, R. (2025, December 12). MUSDB18-HQ—An Uncompressed Version of MUSDB18. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/3338373.
27. Music source separation with band-split RNN10.1109/TASLP.2023.3271145 ↗
28. Lu, W.T., Wang, J.C., Kong, Q., and Hung, Y.N. (2024, January 14–19). Music source separation with band-split rope transformer. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10446843 ↗
29. Wang, J.C., Lu, W.T., and Won, M. (2023). Mel-band RoFormer for music source separation. arXiv.
30. Takahashi, N., and Mitsufuji, Y. (2017, January 15–18). Multi-scale multi-band densenets for audio source separation. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), New Paltz, NY, USA.10.1109/WASPAA.2017.8169987 ↗
31. Chen, J., Vekkot, S., and Shukla, P. (2024, January 14–19). Music source separation based on a lightweight deep learning framework (DTTNET: Dual-path TFC-TDF UNet). Proceedings of the ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10448020 ↗
32. Daly, M. (2024, January 14–19). Remixing music for hearing aids using ensemble of fine-tuned source separators. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICASSPW62465.2024.10627557 ↗
33. Jeon, C.B., Wichern, G., Germain, F.G., and Le Roux, J. (2024, January 14–19). Why does music source separation benefit from cacophony?. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICASSPW62465.2024.10669899 ↗
34. Khera, H., Pauwels, J., Archer-Boyd, A.W., and Sandler, M.B. (2025, January 12–15). Beyond Architecture: The Critical Impact of Inference Overlap on Music Source Separation Benchmarks. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), Tahoe City, CA, USA.10.1109/WASPAA66052.2025.11230966 ↗
35. Stöter, F.R., Liutkus, A., and Ito, N. (2018). The 2018 signal separation evaluation campaign. Proceedings of the International Conference on Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-93764-9_28 ↗
36. Bittner, R.M., Wilkins, J., Yip, H., and Bello, J.P. (2016). MedleyDB 2.0: New data and a system for sustainable data collection. ISMIR Late Break. Demo Pap., 36.
37. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform10.1109/PROC.1978.10837 ↗
38. Jansson, A., Humphrey, E., Montecchio, N., Bittner, R., Kumar, A., and Weyde, T. (2017, January 23–27). Singing voice separation with deep u-net convolutional networks. Proceedings of the 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Suzhou, China.
39. Luo, Y., and Mesgarani, N. (2018, January 15–20). Tasnet: Time-domain audio separation network for real-time, single-channel speech separation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8462116 ↗
40. Cohen-Hadria, A., Roebel, A., and Peeters, G. (2019, January 2–6). Improving singing voice separation using deep u-net and wave-u-net with data augmentation. Proceedings of the 2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), A Coruña, Spain.10.23919/EUSIPCO.2019.8902810 ↗
41. Wang, H., Zou, Y., and Wang, W.S. (2021). A hidden space data augmentation method for acoustic scene classification. arXiv.10.31219/osf.io/3mwa7 ↗
42. Fitzgerald, D., and Jaiswal, R. (2012, January 17–21). On the use of masking filters in sound source separation. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx-12), York, UK.