Evaluation of trench backfills at highway cross-drains
Source abstract
Abstract
A highway cross-drain is an important element in a highway drainage system. This structure, however, has been related to the ride quality deterioration caused by pavement surface dips above this structure. In-situ probing techniques, such as the cone penetration test (CPT), miniature cone penetration test (Mini-cone) and dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), were used to diagnose the causes of the dip problem. The field evaluations indicated that when a pavement surface dip occurred, the trench backfill underneath was softer than the adjacent subgrade soil. Because of its simplicity and potential as a quality control tool during the backfill process, the DCP test was given special attention. The field case histories and full-scale laboratory tests confirmed that DCP results can provide a reasonable estimation of the stiffness (modulus) of different trench backfills and subgrade soils. A possible way to prevent a pavement dip from occurring at a cross drain is to make a backfill stiffer than adjacent subgrade soils. The compaction results from the full-scale laboratory tests indicated that sand is not always successfully used for highway cross-drains due to its poor gradation and difficulty in compaction. Other materials, such as crushed limestone and recycled asphalt pavement (RAP), are good alternates because of their good workability and high stiffness when compacted.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Ann Book ASTM Standards · 1999 · 04 · 112
2. Ann Book ASTM Standards · 2001 · 04 · 78
3. Ann Book ASTM Standards · 2002 · 08 · 1
4. Bester MD · 1977
5. Burnham TR · 1997
6. Chen J · 1999
7. Jayawickrama PW · 2000 · 71
8. Kinchen RW · 1980
9. Kleyn EG · 1975
10. Konard JM · 2000 · 225
11. 2000
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66) ↗
13. Tumay MT · 1994
14. Tumay MT · ISC″ 98 Balkema · 1998 · 2 · 1183
15. Webster SL Grau RH Williams TP Description and application of dual mass dynamic cone penetrometer Geotechnical Laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineers,Instruction Report GL-92-31992
16. Zhang Z · 2005