Decoupling Tissue and Abdominal Forces in Laparoscopic Robotic Surgery via Viscoelastic Modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery provides minimally invasive access to the abdominal cavity but poses control challenges for robotic systems due to the fulcrum constraint at the abdominal wall and the simultaneous interaction of the instrument with both the abdominal wall and internal soft tissue. While current clinical platforms (e.g., da Vinci) primarily rely on visual feedback and do not possess force sensors at the instrument tip, the transition to autonomous robotic surgery requires precise force feedback to ensure safety and effective tissue manipulation. Therefore, developing methods to decouple interaction forces using a single force sensor configuration is a critical enabling technology for future instrumented surgical robots. This paper presents a force-decoupling method that estimates, using only one force sensor, the individual forces applied to the abdominal wall and to internal soft tissue through a viscoelastic modeling approach based on Maxwell elements. Two configurations were evaluated, showing that a single-element Maxwell model provides the best trade-off between accuracy and computational complexity, achieving estimation errors of 9% and 13% for abdominal wall forces, with a root mean square error (RMSE) below 0.36 N. The method was implemented and experimentally validated in a force-controlled robotic system, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving force regulation and interaction safety without requiring additional sensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Surgical Simulation and Training · Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
Funding
Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities of the Government of Spain
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures10.1007/s00464-010-1328-z ↗
2. Fontúrbel, C., Cisnal, A., Fraile-Marinero, J.C., and Pérez-Turiel, J. (2023). Force-based control strategy for a collaborative robotic camera holder in laparoscopic surgery using pivoting motion. Front. Robot. AI, 10.10.3389/frobt.2023.1145265 ↗
3. Abdelaal, A.E., Fang, J., Reinhart, T.N., Mejia, J.A., Zhao, T.Z., Bohg, J., and Okamura, A.M. (2025). Force-Aware Autonomous Robotic Surgery. arXiv.
4. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator10.1002/rcs.1468 ↗
5. Robot-Enabled Uterus Manipulator for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Soft RCM Constraints: Design, Control, and Evaluation10.1109/TMRB.2022.3181497 ↗
6. Smart tissue anastomosis robot (STAR): A vision-guided robotics system for laparoscopic suturing10.1109/TBME.2014.2302385 ↗
7. Saeidi, H., Le, H.N.D., Opfermann, J.D., Leonard, S., Kim, A., Hsieh, M.H., Kang, J.U., and Krieger, A. (2019, January 20–24). Autonomous Laparoscopic Robotic Suturing with a Novel Actuated Suturing Tool and 3D Endoscope. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794306 ↗
8. Muñoz, V., Garcia-Morales, I., Fraile-Marinero, J., Perez-Turiel, J., Muñoz-Garcia, A., Bauzano, E., Rivas-Blanco, I., and Sabater-Navarro, J. (2021). Collaborative Robotic Assistant Platform for Endonasal Surgery: Preliminary In-Vitro Trials. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072320 ↗
9. Robust Torque-Computed Control for a Robot Manipulator with Unit Dual Quaternion10.1109/TIE.2025.3552269 ↗
10. Medical robotics–Regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy10.1126/scirobotics.aam8638 ↗
11. Autonomy for Surgical Robots: Concepts and Paradigms10.1109/TMRB.2019.2913282 ↗
12. Autonomy in Surgical Robotics10.1146/annurev-control-062420-090543 ↗
13. Concepts and Trends in Autonomy for Robot-Assisted Surgery10.1109/JPROC.2022.3176828 ↗
14. First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback10.1111/codi.13882 ↗
15. Toward Autonomous Robotic Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Hybrid Framework Combining Task-Motion Planning and Dynamic Behavior Trees10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308619 ↗
16. Leonard, S., Shademan, A., Kim, Y., Krieger, A., and Kim, P.C.W. (June, January 31). Smart Tissue Anastomosis Robot (STAR): Accuracy evaluation for supervisory suturing using near-infrared fluorescent markers. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China.10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907108 ↗
17. Online Trajectory Planning and Force Control for Automation of Surgical Tasks10.1109/TASE.2017.2676018 ↗
18. Vision-Based Surgical Suture Looping Through Trajectory Planning for Wound Suturing10.1109/TASE.2018.2840532 ↗
19. Su, B., Tang, J., and Liao, H. (October, January 28). Automatic laser ablation control algorithm for an novel endoscopic laser ablation end effector for precision neurosurgery. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany.10.1109/IROS.2015.7353996 ↗
20. Othman, W., Lai, Z.H.A., Abril, C., Barajas-Gamboa, J.S., Corcelles, R., Kroh, M., and Qasaimeh, M.A. (2022). Tactile Sensing for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Conventional Methods and Potential Emerging Tactile Technologies. Front. Robot. AI, 8.10.3389/frobt.2021.705662 ↗
21. Seibold, U., Kubler, B., and Hirzinger, G. (2005, January 18–22). Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain.
22. Ehrampoosh, A., Shirinzadeh, B., Pinskier, J., Smith, J., Moshinsky, R., and Zhong, Y. (2022). A Force-Feedback Methodology for Teleoperated Suturing Task in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22207829 ↗
23. Force Sensor Integrated Surgical Forceps for Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery10.1109/TRO.2015.2473515 ↗
24. A micro optical force sensor for force feedback during minimally invasive robotic surgery10.1016/j.sna.2004.04.057 ↗
25. Kim, U.K., Lee, D., Moon, H., Koo, J.C., and Choi, H. (2014, January 14–18). Design and realization of grasper-integrated force sensor for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/IROS.2014.6943173 ↗
26. Sensorless Real-Time Force Estimation in Microsurgery Robots Using a Time Series Convolutional Neural Network10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3124304 ↗
27. Interactive deformation of soft tissues with haptic feedback for medical learning10.1109/TITB.2003.821311 ↗
28. Deformable simulation using force propagation model with finite element optimization10.1016/j.cag.2004.04.011 ↗
29. A quantitative comparison of soft tissue compressive viscoelastic model accuracy10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.007 ↗
30. Viscoelastic modeling based force control framework for enhancing operation safety of soft tissue for orthopedic surgical robots10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109291 ↗
31. Pedicle drilling force control of a robotic surgical system via spine-soft tissue coupling model and parameters optimization10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107710 ↗
32. A data driven recurrent neural network approach for reproduction of variable visuo-haptic force feedback in surgical tool insertion10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122221 ↗
33. Jung, W.J., Kwak, K.S., and Lim, S.C. (2021). Vision-Based Suture Tensile Force Estimation in Robotic Surgery. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21010110 ↗
34. Real-time simulation of viscoelastic tissue behavior with physics-guided deep learning10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102165 ↗
35. Vision-based estimation of manipulation forces by deep learning of laparoscopic surgical images obtained in a porcine excised kidney experiment10.1038/s41598-024-60574-w ↗
36. Chua, Z., Jarc, A.M., and Okamura, A.M. (June, January 30). Toward Force Estimation in Robot-Assisted Surgery using Deep Learning with Vision and Robot State. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Xi’an, China.10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9560945 ↗
37. Nillahoot, N., Pillai, B.M., Sharma, B., Wilasrusmee, C., and Suthakorn, J. (2022). Interactive 3D Force/Torque Parameter Acquisition and Correlation Identification during Primary Trocar Insertion in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: 5 Cases. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22228970 ↗
38. Friction dynamics of trocars10.1007/s00464-006-9105-8 ↗
39. Yang, H., Zhou, H., Fischer, G.S., and Wu, J.Y. (2024). A Hybrid Model and Learning-Based Force Estimation Framework for Surgical Robots. arXiv.10.1109/IROS58592.2024.10802648 ↗
40. Wu, J.Y., Yilmaz, N., Tumerdem, U., and Kazanzides, P. (2021, January 17–19). Robot Force Estimation with Learned Intraoperative Correction. Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Medical Robotics (ISMR), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/ISMR48346.2021.9661568 ↗
41. Rumbo, I., Cases-Hurtado, J., Manrique-Córdoba, J., Romero-Ante, J.D., Martorell, C., Vivas, Ó.A., and Sabater-Navarro, J.M. (2023, January 6–8). Plataforma experimental para la obtención de las fuerzas de interacción en cirugía mínimamente invasiva. Proceedings of the XLIV Jornadas de Automática, Zaragoza, Spain.10.17979/spudc.9788497498609.110 ↗
42. Sutura automatizada para una plataforma robótica de asistencia a la cirugía laparoscópica10.4995/riai.2024.20642 ↗
43. Yang, H., Al-Zogbi, L., Yildiz, A., Simaan, N., and Wu, J.Y. (2025). Sensorless Remote Center of Motion Misalignment Estimation. arXiv.