Effect of Snow on Automotive LiDAR Perception Under Controlled Climatic Chamber Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
With the increasing deployment of autonomous and semi-autonomous road vehicles, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADASs) rely heavily on multi-modal sensing technologies to ensure safe and reliable operation. Among these sensors, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) provides high-resolution three-dimensional environmental perception but is particularly vulnerable to adverse weather conditions such as snowfall. Snowfall can degrade LiDAR performance through signal attenuation, backscattering, false detections, and sensor surface contamination, ultimately reducing visibility and detection reliability. In this study, an experimental investigation was conducted in a climatic chamber to systematically assess LiDAR performance degradation under controlled snowfall conditions. Key parameters influencing sensor behavior, including chamber air temperature, precipitation intensity, and sensor orientation, were isolated and examined. Chamber temperature was varied to generate snow characteristics representative of dry and wet snow, while precipitation intensity was controlled by adjusting snow gun flow rates. Sensor orientation was modified to evaluate its effect on perceived precipitation and snow accumulation. The experimental results confirm the initial hypothesis that snowfall intensity, snow physical properties, and sensor orientation exert a significant influence on LiDAR performance degradation. Increasing precipitation intensity significantly accelerates both 3D target detection loss and 2D visibility reduction, with polynomial regression revealing a non-linear degradation response. Inclined sensor orientations exhibited more rapid performance deterioration compared to a horizontal configuration. These findings provide valuable insights into LiDAR vulnerability in snowy environments and support the development of mitigation strategies to improve ADAS and autonomous vehicle operation in cold climates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies · Icing and De-icing Technologies · Cryospheric studies and observations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
ACE Climatic Aerodynamic Wind Tunnel, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
Department of Civil and Environmental and Earth Science, Engineering College, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey of autonomous driving: Common practices and emerging technologies10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983149 ↗
2. Antony, M.M., and Whenish, R. (2021). Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Automotive Embedded Systems: Key Technologies, Innovations, and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-59897-6_9 ↗
3. Kogut, P. (2025, December 01). Lidar Vs. Radar: Differences & Uses to Pick the Right One. Available online: https://eos.com/blog/lidar-vs-radar/.
4. Geodetic laser scanning10.1063/1.2825070 ↗
5. Elaksher, A., Ali, T., and Alharthy, A. (2023). A quantitative assessment of LiDAR data accuracy. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15020442 ↗
6. Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: Data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations10.1144/0016-76492007-100 ↗
7. A least squares collocation method for accuracy improvement of mobile LiDAR systems10.3390/rs70607402 ↗
8. Wu, Z., Song, Y., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Sha, H., Shi, M., Zhang, H., Qin, L., Liang, L., and Jia, P. (2024). Advancements in Key Parameters of Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave Light Detection and Ranging: A Research Review. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14177810 ↗
9. Li, L., Pao, W.Y., Agelin-Chaab, M., Komar, J., and Lang, H. (2025, January 25–28). Investigating Automotive Sensor Perception in Rain: A Case Study on TOF and FMCW LiDAR. Proceedings of the CSME-CFDSC-CSR 2025 International Congress, Montreal, QC, Canada.
10. Dreissig, M., Scheuble, D., Piewak, F., and Boedecker, J. (2023). Survey on lidar perception in adverse weather conditions. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Anchorage, AK, USA, 4–7 June 2023, IEEE.10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186539 ↗
11. Abu-Shaqra, A.D., Abu-Alrub, N.J., and Rawashdeh, N.A. (2022). Object detection in degraded lidar signals by synthetic snowfall noise for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the Autonomous Systems: Sensors, Processing and Security for Ground, Air, Sea and Space Vehicles and Infrastructure 2022, Orlando, FL, USA, 3 April–13 June 2022, SPIE.10.1117/12.2617569 ↗
12. Park, J., Jo, S., Seo, H.-T., and Park, J. (2024). LiDAR-based snowfall level classification for safe autonomous driving in terrestrial, maritime, and aerial environments. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24175587 ↗
13. Understanding lidar performance for autonomous vehicles under snowfall conditions10.1109/TITS.2024.3409907 ↗
14. Dreissig, M., Scheuble, D., Piewak, F., and Boedecker, J. (2023). Survey on LiDAR Perception in Adverse Weather Conditions. arXiv.10.1109/IV55152.2023.10186539 ↗
15. Kurup, M., and Bos, J. (2021). DSOR: A scalable statistical filter for removing falling snow from LiDAR point clouds in severe winter weather. arXiv, Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.07078.
16. Wang, W., You, X., Chen, L., Tian, J., Tang, F., and Zhang, L. (2022). A scalable and accurate de-snowing algorithm for LiDAR point clouds in winter. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14061468 ↗
17. Label-efficient semantic segmentation of LiDAR point clouds in adverse weather conditions10.1109/LRA.2024.3396099 ↗
18. Pao, W., Li, L., Agelin-Chaab, M., and Komar, J. (2023). “Drive-thru climate tunnel: A proposed method to study ADAS performance in adverse weather”. WCX SAE World Congress Experience, SAE Technical. SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2023-01-0827 ↗
19. Woo, J., and Lee, S. (2011, January 13–16). Test-Bed Design for Evaluation of Intelligent Transportation Systems and Intelligent Vehicle Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT2011), Gangwon, Republic of Korea.
20. Motors, G. (2025, December 01). Canadian Technical Centre McLaughlin Advanced Technology Track, Media Backgrounder. Available online: https://www.gm.ca/en/home/company/canada/ctc-mclaughlin-advanced-technology-track.html.
21. A meteorological supersite for aviation and cold weather applications10.1007/s00024-018-1880-3 ↗
22. Carvalho, M., Moradi, S., Hosseinnouri, F., Keshavan, K., Villeneuve, E., Gultepe, I., Komar, J., Agelin-Chaab, M., and Hangan, H. (2024). Towards a model of snow accretion for autonomous vehicles. Atmosphere, 15.10.3390/atmos15050548 ↗
23. Colomb, M., Duthon, P., and Bernardin, F. (2016, January 13–14). A Controlled Environment for Testing Sensors Under Adverse Weather Conditions: The Cerema R&D Fog and Rain Platform. Proceedings of the VISION Congress Organised by the SIA (French Society of Automotive Engineers), Paris, France.10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.233 ↗
24. CARISSMA (2026, January 07). CARISSMA—Center of Automotive Research on Integrated Safety Systems and Measurement Area. Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt. Available online: https://www.thi.de/en/research/carissma/.
25. (2026, January 07). Test World Indoor Winter Test Tracks | Test World | Millbrook. Millbrook Proving Ground. Available online: https://www.millbrook.co.uk/services/proving-grounds/winterdriving/indoor-winter-testing/.
26. National Research Institute of Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (2026, January 07). Snow and Ice Disaster Prevention Experiment Building. Available online: https://www.bosai.go.jp/study/snow.html.
27. Tech, V. (2026, January 07). Virginia Smart Roads Highway Section. Available online: https://www.vtti.vt.edu/facilities/highway-section.html.
28. KICT (2026, January 07). An Opening Ceremony of the Center for Road Weather Proving Ground, Yeoncheon. Available online: https://www.kict.re.kr/board.es?mid=a20601000000&bid=newsnotice&act=view&list_no=13372.
29. Recent Advances in Snow Monitoring from Local to Global Scales10.1007/s40641-025-00207-0 ↗
30. Assessment of the Thies optical disdrometer performance10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.014 ↗
31. (2001). Atmospheric Icing of Structures (Standard No. ISO 12494).
32. Estimation of Wet Snow Accretion on Structures10.1016/S0165-232X(89)80018-7 ↗
33. Active prevention of snow accumulation on cameras of autonomous vehicles10.1007/s42452-020-04106-x ↗
34. Wet Snow Accretion on Overhead Lines with French Report of Experience10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.015 ↗
35. Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Wet Snow Accumulation on Inclined Cylindrical Surfaces
36. Pao, W.Y., Howorth, J., Li, L., Agelin-Chaab, M., Roy, L., Knutzen, J., Baltazar-Y-Jimenez, A., and Muenker, K. (2024). Investigation of automotive LiDAR vision in rain from material and optical perspectives. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202403.1667.v1 ↗
37. (2026, January 07). Livox’s First Automotive-Grade Lidar for Serial Production. Available online: https://www.livoxtech.com/hap.
38. Comparison of three types of laser optical disdrometers under natural rainfall conditions10.1080/02626667.2019.1709641 ↗
39. Stull, R. (2022). 18 Atmospheric Boundary Layer, The University of British Columbia.
40. Bohren, C.F., and Huffman, D.R. (1997). Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley.10.1002/9783527618156 ↗
41. Ishimaru, A. (1997). Wave Propagation and Scattering in Random Media, IEEE Press.
42. Laser Propagation Through Poly-Methyl-METHACRYLATE (PMMA) Thin Films Prepared By Pulsed Laser Deposition
43. (2026, January 07). Physical Properties of Snow. Available online: https://www.snow.institute/physical-properties-of-snow/?lang=en&utm_source=chatgpt.com.
44. Remote Sensing, Model-Derived and Ground Measurements of Snow Water Equivalent and Snow Density in Alaska10.4236/ijg.2012.35114 ↗
45. Winter adverse driving dataset for autonomy in inclement winter weather10.1117/1.OE.62.3.031207 ↗
46. Haider, A., Pigniczki, M., Koyama, S., Köhler, M.H., Haas, L., Fink, M., Schardt, M., Nagase, K., Zeh, T., and Eryildirim, A. (2023). A Methodology to Model the Rain and Fog Effect on the Performance of Automotive LiDAR Sensors. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23156891 ↗
47. Choe, J., Cho, H., and Chung, Y. (2023). Performance Verification of Autonomous Driving LiDAR Sensors Under Rainfall Conditions in Darkroom. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24010014 ↗
48. Goodin, C., Carruth, D., Doude, M., and Hudson, C. (2019). Predicting the Influence of Rain on LIDAR in ADAS. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8010089 ↗
49. Kim, J., Park, B., and Kim, J. (2023). Empirical Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle’s LiDAR Detection Performance Degradation for Actual Road Driving in Rain and Fog. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23062972 ↗