journal article·2026-02-20Open access

CFD-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization and Comparative Aeroacoustics Source Analysis of Modified Leading-Edge Wavy-Wing Configurations for the NACA 0020 Airfoil

Ahmet Şumnu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

The present numerical study simultaneously investigates the aerodynamic performance, shape optimization, and aeroacoustic characteristics of modified leading-edge wavy wings for the NACA 0020 airfoil. Unlike conventional passive flow-control approaches, the present study proposes a collaborative vortex–slot control strategy, where streamwise vortices induced by a wavy leading edge interact constructively with momentum injection from upper-surface slot channels. Flow field is analyzed at a Reynolds number of 290,000 and various angles of attack (AoA) utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Three leading-edge wavy wing configurations, namely A3L11, A3L40 and A11L40, are examined and further modified by introducing streamwise slots near the leading edge on the upper surface of the wing. Three slot diameters (0.07c, 0.10c, and 0.13c) are examined at a constant draft angle of 7.5°, which represents the inclination of the slot relative to the wing surface. The numerical results are validated against experimental data available in the literature. The findings indicate that the A3L11 configuration with a 0.07c slot diameter, as well as the A11L40 configuration at high angles of attack, outperform the baseline wavy wing. This improvement is attributed to the slotting mechanism, which enhances surface suction and streamwise momentum, thereby improving boundary-layer behavior. An increase in aerodynamic efficiency, quantified by the lift-to-drag ratio, is observed at 20° AoA for all configurations. To further enhance performance, shape optimization is performed by optimizing the slot diameter and the distance between the chord line and the slot center using a Genetic Algorithm (GA), with the A11L40 configuration at 20° AoA identified as the optimal design. The optimized configuration yields an overall aerodynamic performance improvement of approximately 27.76% compared to the smooth wing, while broadband aeroacoustic source modeling indicates a relative reduction in predicted noise-source intensity relative to the baseline modified wing. The results are presented through combined quantitative metrics and qualitative flow analyses, demonstrating the potential applicability of the proposed optimization framework to low-Reynolds-number aerodynamic and aeroacoustic design problems, such as those encountered in small-scale air vehicles, bio-inspired wings, and noise-sensitive systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aerospace Engineering Department, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, İskenderun Technical University, Hatay 31200, Türkiye

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper10.1002/jmor.1052250105 ↗
2. Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092201 ↗
3. The tubercles on humpback whales’ flippers: Application of bio-inspired technology10.1093/icb/icr016 ↗
4. Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance10.2514/1.28497 ↗
5. Experimental evaluation of sinusoidal leading edges10.2514/1.30303 ↗
6. Stanway, M.J. (2008). Hydrodynamic Effects of Leading-Edge Tubercles on Control Surfaces and in Flapping Foil Propulsion. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
7. Aerodynamic characteristics of wings with wavy leading edges
8. How bumps on whale flippers delay stall: An aerodynamic model10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.054502 ↗
9. Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles10.2514/1.J050631 ↗
10. Hansen, K.L. (2012). Effect of Leading Edge Tubercles on Airfoil Performance. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Adelaide].
11. Computational evaluation of the performance of lifting surfaces with leading-edge protuberances10.2514/1.C031163 ↗
12. Lohry, M.W., Clifton, D., and Martinelli, L. (2012, January 9–13). Characterization and design of tubercle leading-edge wings. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7), Big Island, HI, USA.
13. Computational investigation of airfoils with leading-edge protuberances10.2514/1.C031675 ↗
14. Numerical analysis of effects of leading-edge protuberances on aircraft wing performance10.2514/1.C031670 ↗
15. Melo De Sousa, J., and Camara, J. (2013). Numerical study on the use of a sinusoidal leading edge for passive stall control at low Reynolds number. 51st AIAA, AIAA.10.2514/6.2013-62 ↗
16. Low-Reynolds-number effects in passive stall control using sinusoidal leading edges10.2514/1.J051235 ↗
17. Aerodynamic control of low-Reynolds-number airfoil with leading-edge protuberances10.2514/1.J052319 ↗
18. Rostamzadeh, N., Hansen, K.L., Kelso, R.M., and Dally, B.B. (2014). The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil’s performance with undulating leading edge modification. Phys. Fluids, 26.10.1063/1.4896748 ↗
19. Natarajan, K., Sudhakar, S., and Paulpandian, S. (2014). Experimental studies on the effect of leading edge tubercles on laminar separation bubble. 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2014, AIAA.10.2514/6.2014-1279 ↗
20. Aerodynamic characteristics of finite span wings with leading-edge protuberances10.2514/1.J053568 ↗
21. Flow over a wing with leading-edge undulations10.2514/1.J053142 ↗
22. Paula, A.A.D. (2016). The Airfoil Thickness Effects on Wavy Leading Edge Phenomena at Low Reynolds Number Regime. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo].
23. Aftab, S.M.A., and Ahmad, K.A. (2017). CFD study on NACA 4415 airfoil implementing spherical and sinusoidal Tubercle Leading Edge. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0188792 ↗
24. Effect of bio-inspired sinusoidal leading-edges on wings10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.043 ↗
25. Effects of smart flap on aerodynamic performance of sinusoidal leading-edge wings at low Reynolds numbers10.1177/0954410020946903 ↗
26. Experimental investigation of ground effects on aerodynamics of sinusoidal leading-edge wings10.1177/0954406220975422 ↗
27. Numerical study of the effect of winglet on the aerodynamic performance of sinusoidal and simple leading-edge wings10.1108/AEAT-03-2022-0089 ↗
28. Du, H., Jiang, H., Yang, Z., Xia, H., Chen, S., and Wu, J. (2024). Experimental investigation of the effect of bio-inspired wavy leading-edges on aerodynamic performance and flow topologies of the airfoil. Aerospace, 11.10.3390/aerospace11030194 ↗
29. Numerical and experimental analysis of the effect of wavy leading edge on stabilizer10.1063/5.0267295 ↗
30. Reduction of flow induced airfoil tonal noise using leading edge sinusoidal modifications
31. Experimental and numerical investigation of turbulence-airfoil noise reduction using wavy edges10.2514/1.J052394 ↗
32. Numerical analysis of broadband noise reduction with wavy leading edge10.1016/j.cja.2018.03.020 ↗
33. Optimization of wavy cylinder for aerodynamic drag and aeroacoustic sound reduction using computational fluid dynamics analysis10.1177/0954406220950353 ↗
34. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic optimization of leading-edge undulation of a NACA 65 (12)-10 airfoil10.2514/1.J060716 ↗
35. Numerical investigation of aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of bionic airfoils inspired by bird wing10.1177/0954410018812617 ↗
36. Numerical study on aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performances of bioinspired wings10.1155/2023/9930841 ↗
37. Xing, Y., Chen, W., Wang, X., Tong, F., and Qiao, W. (2023). Effect of wavy leading edges on airfoil trailing-edge bluntness noise. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10040353 ↗
38. Investigation of aerodynamic and aeroacoustic behavior of bio-inspired airfoils with numerical and experimental methods10.1177/09544062231185495 ↗
39. Tang, H., Lei, Y., Li, X., Gao, K., and Li, Y. (2020). Aerodynamic shape optimization of a wavy airfoil for ultra-low Reynolds number regime in gliding flight. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13020467 ↗
40. An aerodynamic optimization design study on the bio-inspired airfoil with leading-edge tubercles
41. Optimizing Effect of Wavy Leading Edge (WLE) in Rectangular Wing and Taper Wing
42. A novel in-situ sensor calibration method for building thermal systems based on virtual samples and autoencoder10.1016/j.energy.2024.131314 ↗
43. Virtual sample diffusion generation method guided by large language model-generated knowledge for enhancing information completeness and zero-shot fault diagnosis in building thermal systems10.1631/jzus.A2400560 ↗
44. Versteeg, H.K., and Malalasekera, W. (2007). An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, Pearson Education Limited. [2nd ed.].
45. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
46. Blake, W.K. (2017). Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration, Academic Press.
47. The generation of noise by isotropic turbulence
48. On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory
49. Lilley, G.M. (1993). The Radiated Noise from Isotropic Turbulence Revisited, ICASE Report No. ICASE-93-75.
50. Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations10.1063/1.4907798 ↗
51. Leading edge serrations for the reduction of aerofoil self-noise at low angle of attack, pre-stall and post-stall conditions10.1177/1475472X20978379 ↗
52. Bazaraa, M.S., Sherali, H.D., and Shetty, C.M. (1993). Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms, Wiley.
53. Goldberg, D.E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley.
54. Holland, J.H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 ↗
55. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., and Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2016). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
56. Simpson, T.W. (1998). Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models in the Multidisciplinary Design of an Aerospike Nozzle, NASA/CR-1998-206935.10.2514/6.1998-4755 ↗