journal article·2026-02-19Open access

A Study of Sensitive Fault Detection for Lithium-Ion Batteries Being Recharged Using Support Vector Machine Classifier and Receiver Operating Characteristics

Seçkin Açıcı, Abdulhakim Karakaya

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Several installations equipped with lithium-ion batteries may require additional precautions. While lithium-ion batteries offer good performance relative to other rechargeable batteries, their state of health should be monitored. Faulty lithium-ion batteries may be vulnerable to thermal runaway or explosion. Early detection of those vulnerabilities can be done accurately by using an effective charging-anomaly detection method. In this paper, a binary support vector machine classification method was used to detect faulty lithium-ion batteries that are being recharged with constant voltage. The support vector machine algorithm was trained on battery data acquired after the recharging was finished. The battery data consisted of temperature, voltage, and varying recharging current measured inside the lithium-ion battery. Estimation losses, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were computed and presented after training and testing the algorithm. Class labels and classifier’s generalization performance information were also displayed. An estimation loss of 7% was found at the end of this research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Software System Performance and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Energy System Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Kocaeli University, Izmit 41001, Türkiye

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Review on Li-Ion Battery vs. Nickel Metal Hydride Battery in EV10.1155/2022/7910072 ↗
2. Jiang, L., Diao, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., and Li, T. (2021). Review of the charging safety and charging safety protection of electric vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J., 12.10.3390/wevj12040184 ↗
3. Characterization and assessment of fire evolution process of electric vehicles placed in parallel10.1016/j.psep.2022.08.055 ↗
4. Ghiji, M., Edmonds, S., and Moinuddin, K. (2021). A Review of Experimental and Numerical Studies of Lithium Ion Battery Fires. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11031247 ↗
5. Detection of voltage fault in the battery system of electric vehicles using statistical analysis10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118172 ↗
6. Samanta, A., Chowdhuri, S., and Williamson, S. (2021). Machine Learning-based data-driven fault detection/diagnosis of Lithium-Ion battery: A critical review. Electronics, 10.10.3390/electronics10111309 ↗
7. Research on fault diagnosis method of electric vehicle battery system based on Wavelet-RBF Neural Network10.1088/1757-899X/435/1/012023 ↗
8. Toward a safer battery management system: A critical review on diagnosis and prognosis of battery short circuit10.1016/j.isci.2020.101010 ↗
9. Li-Ion battery fault diagnosis dedicated to electric vehicles by neural network pattern recognition
10. Wang, J., Zhang, S., and Hu, X. (2021). A fault diagnosis method for Lithium-Ion battery packs using improved RBF neural network. Front. Energy Res., 9.10.3389/fenrg.2021.702139 ↗
11. Yang, J., Cheng, F., Duodu, M., Li, M., and Han, C. (2022). High-Precision fault detection for electric vehicle battery system based on Bayesian optimization SVDD. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15228331 ↗
12. Moebes, T.A. (2011). Lithium battery analysis: Probability of failure assessment using logistic regression. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 24–27 January 2011, IEEE.10.1109/RAMS.2011.5754424 ↗
13. A review on fault mechanism and diagnosis approach for Li-Ion batteries10.1155/2015/631263 ↗
14. Internal short circuit detection in Li-ion batteries using supervised machine learning10.1038/s41598-020-58021-7 ↗
15. Online diagnosis of soft internal short circuits in series-connected battery packs using modified kernel principal component analysis10.1016/j.est.2022.104815 ↗
16. Adaptive nonlinear model-based fault diagnosis of Li-Ion batteries10.1109/TIE.2014.2336599 ↗
17. Online internal short circuit detection for a large format lithium ion battery10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.019 ↗
18. Battery safety: Fault diagnosis from laboratory to real world10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234111 ↗
19. Multi-fault detection and diagnosis method for battery packs based on statistical analysis10.1016/j.energy.2024.130465 ↗
20. Detection and isolation of faults in a lithium-ion battery pack using a switched architecture of equivalent cell diagnosers10.1016/j.est.2024.111811 ↗
21. An early fault detection method of series battery packs based on multi-feature clustering and unsupervised scoring10.1016/j.energy.2025.135754 ↗
22. Concurrent multi-fault diagnosis of lithium-ion battery packs using random convolution kernel transformation and Gaussian process classifier10.1016/j.energy.2024.132467 ↗
23. Advanced data-driven fault diagnosis in lithium-ion battery management systems for electric vehicles: Progress, challenges, and future perspectives10.1016/j.etran.2024.100374 ↗
24. Fault detection of a Li-ion battery using SVM based machine learning and unscented Kalman filter10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.279 ↗
25. Early stage internal short circuit fault diagnosis for lithium-ion batteries based on local-outlier detection10.1016/j.est.2022.106196 ↗
26. Temperature enhanced early detection of internal short circuits in lithium-ion batteries using an extended Kalman filter10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233874 ↗
27. A method for battery fault diagnosis and early warning combining isolated forest algorithm and sliding window10.1002/ese3.1593 ↗
28. Liu, S., Xie, T., Li, Y., and Liu, S. (2025). Fault Detection for Power Batteries Using a Generative Adversarial Network with a Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (GAN-CNN-LSTM) Hybrid Model. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15115795 ↗
29. Jiang, J., Qu, B., Liu, S., Yan, H., Zhang, Z., and Chang, C. (2024). Fault Diagnosis of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on the Historical Trajectory of Remaining Discharge Capacity. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142310895 ↗
30. Gu, Y., Ni, H., and Li, Y. (2024). Early-Stage ISC Fault Detection for Ship Lithium Batteries Based on Voltage Variance Analysis. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12050303 ↗
31. Panasonic (2023, April 05). Lithium Technical Handbook. Available online: https://energy.panasonic.com/dam/master/pdf/eu/material/old/Panasonic_Batteries_Lithium-Handbook_2025.pdf.
32. MATLAB (2025, September 22). Loss. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/classreg.learning.classif.compactclassificationsvm.loss.html.
33. Kim, M.-C., Lee, J.-H., Wang, D.-H., and Lee, I.-S. (2023). Induction motor fault diagnosis using support vector machine, neural networks, and boosting methods. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23052585 ↗
34. A Comparative study of support vector machine and artificial neural network for option price prediction10.4236/jcc.2021.95006 ↗
35. Awad, M., and Khanna, R. (2015). Efficient Learning Machines: Theories, Concepts and Applications for Engineers and Systems Designers, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9 ↗
36. Scikit (2024, July 20). SVM. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/svm.html.
37. Kernels as features: On kernels, margins, and low-dimensional mappings10.1007/s10994-006-7550-1 ↗
38. MATLAB (2025, September 17). ROC Curves and Performance Metrics. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/performance-curves.html.
39. Pooraskarparast, B., Dang, S.N., Pakrashi, V., and Matos, J.C. (2025). Performance of Fine-Tuning Techniques for Multilabel Classification of Surface Defects in Reinforced Concrete Bridges. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15094725 ↗
40. Atteba, R.G., Shwe, T., Mendonça, I., and Aritsugi, M. (2025). Credit Evaluation Through Integration of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning: Empirical Improvement and Unsupervised Component Analysis. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152413020 ↗
41. Pendrill, L.R., Melin, J., Stavelin, A., and Nordin, G. (2023). Modernising Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves. Algorithms, 16.10.3390/a16050253 ↗
42. (2025, September 20). Towards Data Science, Performance Metrics: Confusion Matrix, Precision, Recall, and F1 Score. Available online: https://www.towardsdatascience.com/performance-metrics-confusion-matrix-precision-recall-and-f1-score-a8fe076a2262/.
43. Scikit (2026, January 10). Precision_Score. Available online: https://www.scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.precision_score.html.
44. Scikit (2026, January 10). Sensitivity_Score. Available online: https://imbalanced-learn.org/stable/references/generated/imblearn.metrics.sensitivity_score.html.
45. Davis, J., and Goadrich, M. (2006). The Relationship Between Precision-Recall and ROC Curves. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ACM, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 25–29 June 2006, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/1143844.1143874 ↗
46. Mathworks (2024, April 25). Loss. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/classreg.learning.classif.compactclassificationsvm.predict.html.