Automatic Identification of Fetal Acidosis Based on Three-Stage Training and Meta-Feature Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Fetal cardiotocography (CTG) is widely used to assess fetal health during labor and to screen for fetal acidosis. However, CTG interpretation relies heavily on clinicians’ experience and is affected by subjectivity and inconsistency, which limit diagnostic reliability. Most existing artificial intelligence approaches simplify fetal acid–base assessment into a binary classification, making it difficult to distinguish acidosis severity and restricting information for refined clinical decision-making. To address these limitations, this study formulates a three-class classification task—normal, moderate acidosis, and severe acidosis—based on the CTU-CHB dataset, using umbilical artery blood pH as the reference standard. A signal-first, conditionally enhanced, three-phase training and meta-feature fusion framework is proposed. In stage A, a CNN-BiLSTM-attention network performs end-to-end modeling of fetal heart rate signals, while a recall feedback-driven dynamic weighted loss alleviates class imbalance and identifies difficult samples. Stage B incorporates relevant clinical detection information for these difficult samples and applies multimodal feature fusion to enhance discrimination. Stage C constructs meta-features from the outputs of the first two stages to adaptively fuse classification preferences and uncertainty. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves an accuracy of 82.80 ± 2.82% and an F1 score of 78.84 ± 2.96%, effectively mitigating class imbalance and difficult sample classification, and providing reliable support for clinical decision-making in fetal acidosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neonatal and fetal brain pathology · ECG Monitoring and Analysis · Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China
College of Mathematics and Statistics, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China
Funding
Scientific Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education · Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Causes and consequences of fetal acidosis10.1136/fn.80.3.F246 ↗
2. Asphyxial complications in the term newborn with severe umbilical acidemia10.1016/0002-9378(92)91728-S ↗
3. The correlation of seizures in newborn infants with significant acidosis at birth with umbilical artery cord gas values
4. Intrauterine asphyxia: Clinical implications for providers of intrapartum care10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.08.007 ↗
5. Neonatal complications in newborns with an umbilical artery pH < 7.0010.1016/S0002-9378(96)70021-2 ↗
6. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why?10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5 ↗
7. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Physiology of fetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum fetal monitoring10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.018 ↗
8. Fetal monitoring technologies for the detection of intrapartum hypoxia-challenges and opportunities10.1088/2057-1976/ad17a6 ↗
9. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020 ↗
10. Fergus, P., Huang, D.-S., and Hamdan, H. (2016). Prediction of intrapartum hypoxia from cardiotocography data using machine learning. Applied Computing in Medicine and Health, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-803468-2.00006-0 ↗
11. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Adjunctive technologies10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.021 ↗
12. Predictive factors for neonatal morbidity in neonates with an umbilical arterial cord pH less than 7.0010.1016/S0002-9378(97)70008-5 ↗
13. Prediction of neonatal acidosis based on the type of fetal hypoxia observed on the cardiotocograph (ctg)
14. Liang, H., Lu, Y., Liu, Q., and Fu, X. (2022, January 11–15). Fully automatic classification of cardiotocographic signals with 1D-CNN and bi-directional GRU. Proceedings of the 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Glasgow, UK.10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871253 ↗
15. Sbrollini, A., Carnicelli, A., Massacci, A., Tomaiuolo, L., Zara, T., Marcantoni, I., Burattini, L., Morettini, M., Fioretti, S., and Burattini, L. (2018, January 17–21). Automatic identification and classification of fetal heart-rate decelerations from cardiotocographic recordings. Proceedings of the 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512432 ↗
16. A CNN-RNN unified framework for intrapartum cardiotocograph classification10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107300 ↗
17. Adhikari, A. (2025). Fetal Acidosis Prediction Using Attention Enhanced Convolutional Neural Networks. [Master’s Thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology].
18. Lu, Y., Liang, H., Yu, Z., and Fu, X. (2023, January 16–17). MT-1DCG: A novel model for multivariate time series classification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Bhubaneswar, India.10.1007/978-981-99-4742-3_18 ↗
19. Zhang, Y., Zhao, Z., Deng, Y., and Jiao, P. (2023, January 15–17). On multi-modal fusion learning in pathological diagnosis of fetal distress. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (Healthcom), Chongqing, China.10.1109/Healthcom56612.2023.10472344 ↗
20. Yefei, Z., Yanjun, D., Xiaohong, Z., Lihuan, S., and Zhidong, Z. (2021, January 23–25). Bidirectional long short-term memory-based intelligent auxiliary diagnosis of fetal health. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), Jeju, Republic of Korea.10.1109/TENSYMP52854.2021.9550851 ↗
21. SM, S.M.A.M. (2025). A Deep Learning Based Approach for Detecting Fetal Stress Using CTG Signal. SSRN, Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5105665.
22. An attention-based CNN-BiLSTM hybrid neural network enhanced with features of discrete wavelet transformation for fetal acidosis classification10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115714 ↗
23. Zhao, Z., Deng, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., and Shao, L. (2019). DeepFHR: Intelligent prediction of fetal Acidemia using fetal heart rate signals based on convolutional neural network. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 19.10.1186/s12911-019-1007-5 ↗
24. Rao, L., Lu, J., Wu, H.-R., Zhao, S., Lu, B.-C., and Li, H. (2024). Automatic classification of fetal heart rate based on a multi-scale LSTM network. Front. Physiol., 15.10.3389/fphys.2024.1398735 ↗
25. 1D-FHRNet: Automatic diagnosis of fetal acidosis from fetal heart rate signals10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102794 ↗
26. A multimodal dual-branch fusion network for fetal hypoxia detection10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125263 ↗
27. DT-CTNet: A clinically interpretable diagnosis model for fetal distress10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105190 ↗
28. Zhang, Y., Deng, Y., Zhou, Z., Zhang, X., Jiao, P., and Zhao, Z. (2022). Multimodal learning for fetal distress diagnosis using a multimodal medical information fusion framework. Front. Physiol., 13.10.3389/fphys.2022.1021400 ↗
29. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
30. The proposal of undersampling method for learning from imbalanced datasets10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.167 ↗
31. Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal loss for dense object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
32. Cui, Y., Jia, M., Lin, T.-Y., Song, Y., and Belongie, S. (2019, January 15–20). Class-balanced loss based on effective number of samples. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00949 ↗
33. Ensemble learning: A survey10.1002/widm.1249 ↗
34. Pavlyshenko, B. (2018, January 21–25). Using stacking approaches for machine learning models. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Stream Mining & Processing (DSMP), Lviv, Ukraine.10.1109/DSMP.2018.8478522 ↗
35. Chudáček, V., Spilka, J., Burša, M., Janků, P., Hruban, L., Huptych, M., and Lhotská, L. (2014). Open access intrapartum CTG database. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14.10.1186/1471-2393-14-16 ↗
36. Zhao, Z., Zhu, J., Jiao, P., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Lu, X., and Zhang, Y. (2024). Hybrid-FHR: A multi-modal AI approach for automated fetal acidosis diagnosis. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 24.10.1186/s12911-024-02423-4 ↗
37. Fetal electrocardiogram ST-segment analysis and prediction of neonatal acidosis10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.01.003 ↗
38. Umbilical cord pH and base excess values in relation to adverse outcome events for infants delivering at term10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.026 ↗
39. Umbilical cord pH, blood gases, and lactate at birth: Normal values, interpretation, and clinical utility10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.001 ↗
40. Chudácčk, V., Huptych, M., Koucký, M., Spilka, J., Bauer, L., and Lhotska, L. (2009, January 4–7). Fetal heart rate data pre-processing and annotation. Proceedings of the 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine, Larnaka, Cyprus.10.1109/ITAB.2009.5394441 ↗
41. Mark, R., Schluter, P., Moody, G., Devlin, P., and Chernoff, D. (1982). An annotated ECG database for evaluating arrhythmia detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE.
42. Wang, H., Yin, Y., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Liu, X., and Shi, L. (2025). Fetal Health Diagnosis Based on Adaptive Dynamic Weighting with Main-Auxiliary Correction Network. BioTech, 14.10.3390/biotech14030057 ↗
43. Cömert, Z., Yang, Z., Velappan, S., Boopathi, A.M., and Kocamaz, A.F. (2018, January 2–5). Performance evaluation of empirical mode decomposition and discrete wavelet transform for computerized hypoxia detection and prediction. Proceedings of the 2018 26th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Izmir, Turkey.10.1109/SIU.2018.8404243 ↗
44. Fetal distress classification with deep convolutional neural network10.2174/1573404816999200821162312 ↗
45. Kadarina, T.M., Basari, B., Gunawan, D., and Auzan, A. (2025). Scalogram-Based Multiclass Fetal State Classification Using Expert-Annotated CTG and SE-ResNet-50. Informatica, 49.10.31449/inf.v49i17.8991 ↗
46. Xu, L., Wang, G., Cao, Z., Chen, Q., Liu, G., and Wei, H. (2023, January 5–8). Research on multimodal deep learning based on CNN and ViT for intrapartum fetal monitoring. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Istanbul, Turkiye.10.1109/BIBM58861.2023.10385278 ↗
47. O’sullivan, M., Gabruseva, T., Boylan, G.B., O’Riordan, M., Lightbody, G., and Marnane, W. (2021, January 23–27). Classification of fetal compromise during labour: Signal processing and feature engineering of the cardiotocograph. Proceedings of the 2021 29th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Dublin, Ireland.10.23919/EUSIPCO54536.2021.9616289 ↗