journal article·2023-01-28

A review of advanced pavement distress evaluation techniques using unmanned aerial vehicles

M. Manjusha, V. Sunitha

Publisher page

Abstract

The economy of the nation is significantly influenced by pavement management systems. The use of cutting-edge techniques and technology in various pavement management system applications, as well as research into these topics, are particularly important today. To reduce human errors in data collection, advances in technology and automated surveillance should be used. The most recent methods used in modern equipment for the automatic evaluation of pavement deterioration are reviewed in this paper. To identify trending tools, research gaps, emerging technologies, challenges and limitations of using computer vision for pavement distress and condition assessment, papers collected using UAV (Unmanned Ariel Vehicle) data collection and the application of machine learning methods are investigated. The review comes to the conclusion that the application of machine learning techniques is the general trend in evaluating the condition of pavements, despite some limitations not only in the detection of a small number of pavement distresses with complex patterns but also in the indication of the severity and density of distresses, opening up possibilities for further study.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Trichy, Tiruchirappalli, India

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.01910.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.019 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0053310.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00533 ↗
3. 10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N48810.22616/ERDev2019.18.N488 ↗
4. 10.30871/jagi.v1i01.36010.30871/jagi.v1i01.360 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10454510.1016/j.autcon.2022.104545 ↗
6. 10.3390/diagnostics1008057710.3390/diagnostics10080577 ↗
7. Bochkovskiy A. Wang C.Y. and Liao H. 2020. YOLOv4: optimal speed and accuracy of object detection arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10934.
8. 10.3390/s2017469610.3390/s20174696 ↗
9. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
10. 10.1155/2011/98935410.1155/2011/989354 ↗
11. 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B1-559-201610.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B1-559-2016 ↗
12. Cline G. D. Shahin M. Y. and Burkhalter J. A. 2003. Automated data collection for pavement condition index survey ” in Proc. Annu. Meeting Transp. Res. Board Washington DC USA pp. 1–16.
13. 10.1080/23311916.2017.137482210.1080/23311916.2017.1374822 ↗
14. Congedo L. 2020. Semi-automatic classification plugin documentation. https://semiautomaticclassificationmanualv5.readthedocs.io/it/latest/ July 29.
15. 10.1016/j.jtte.2016.04.00110.1016/j.jtte.2016.04.001 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:2(120)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:2(120) ↗
17. 10.15517/mym.v8i1.3411310.15517/mym.v8i1.34113 ↗
18. 10.1186/s13640-017-0187-010.1186/s13640-017-0187-0 ↗
19. 10.3390/app1103120410.3390/app11031204 ↗
20. 10.1080/10298436.2020.171404710.1080/10298436.2020.1714047 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000118510.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001185 ↗
22. Emery, W., and Singh, M. C., 2013. Large-area road-surface quality and landcover classification using very-high spatial resolution aerial and satellite data. Technical Report, 13–28.
23. 10.1088/1757-899X/236/1/01210110.1088/1757-899X/236/1/012101 ↗
24. Ge Z. et al. 2021. Yolox: exceeding yolo series in 2021. arXiv 2021 arXiv:2107.08430.
25. George, K.P., Rajagopal, A.S., and Lim, L.K, 1989. Models for predicting pavement deterioration. Transp. Res. Rec, 1215, 1–7.
26. 10.1016/0924-2716(95)91844-A10.1016/0924-2716(95)91844-A ↗
27. 10.1002/stc.250710.1002/stc.2507 ↗
28. 10.3390/rs406157310.3390/rs4061573 ↗
29. Hawkins S 2016. Using a drone and photogrammetry software to create orthomosaic images and 3D model of aircraft accident sites. In Proceedings of the ISASI Seminar. Air Accidents (Engineering) at the UK AAIB. Iceland. Tanpa Awak di Sungai Kembung Pulau Bengkalis Indonesia Didalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Perikanan dan Kelautan Universitas Riau Ke Reykjavik Iceland 17–20 October 2016.
30. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
31. 10.1364/AO.44.00432710.1364/AO.44.004327 ↗
32. Hou, Y., et al., 2020 June. The state-of-the-Art review on applications of intrusive sensing, image processing techniques, and machine learning methods in pavement monitoring and analysis. Engineering Journal, 7 (6), 845–856.
33. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.12410.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.124 ↗
34. 10.1002/stc.255110.1002/stc.2551 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.01010.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.010 ↗
36. 10.1111/mice.1251910.1111/mice.12519 ↗
37. 10.1080/23311916.2017.137482210.1080/23311916.2017.1374822 ↗
38. 10.1061/9780784412343.007010.1061/9780784412343.0070 ↗
39. Jol, H. M., 2008. Ground penetrating radar theory and applications. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier.
40. 10.7250/bjrbe.2019-14.43010.7250/bjrbe.2019-14.430 ↗
41. 10.3390/s1806188110.3390/s18061881 ↗
42. Kim, H., Sim, S., and Cho, S., 2015. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-powered concrete crack detection based on digital image processing. Proc. International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, 105–123.
43. 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B5-515-201610.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B5-515-2016 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.00810.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008 ↗
45. 10.1145/306538610.1145/3065386 ↗
46. 10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00356-610.1016/s2212-5671(14)00356-6 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11263-019-01204-110.1007/s11263-019-01204-1 ↗
48. 10.1109/5.72679110.1109/5.726791 ↗
49. Leonardi G. et al. 2019. 3D mapping of pavement distresses using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system. In: F. Calabr`o L. Della Spina and C. Bevilacqua Eds. Int. Symp. New Metrop. Perspect Springer Reggio Calabria Italy. 164–171.10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_18 ↗
50. 10.1080/10298436.2018.148591710.1080/10298436.2018.1485917 ↗
51. Li W. Shen Z. and Li P. 2019. Crack detection of track plate based on YOLO. In Proceedings of the 2019 12th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design ISCID 2019 Hangzhou China 14–15 December 2019 15–18.10.1109/ISCID.2019.10086 ↗
52. 10.3390/rs1306108110.3390/rs13061081 ↗
53. 10.1117/12.90666710.1117/12.906667 ↗
54. 10.3390/su903045310.3390/su9030453 ↗
55. 10.3390/s2016443010.3390/s20164430 ↗
56. 10.1111/mice.1238710.1111/mice.12387 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11851310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118513 ↗
58. 10.1109/MED.2013.660893410.1109/MED.2013.6608934 ↗
59. 10.1109/BigData50022.2020.937804710.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378047 ↗
60. Mandal V. Uong L. and Adu-Gyamfi Y 2018. Automated road crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE International Conference on Big Data Big Data 2018 Seattle WA USA 10-13 December 201810.1109/BigData.2018.8622327 ↗
61. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway NJ USA 2019. 5212-5215.
62. 10.1007/s10346-010-0227-710.1007/s10346-010-0227-7 ↗
63. 10.3141/2457-0110.3141/2457-01 ↗
64. 10.1109/TITS.2015.242865510.1109/TITS.2015.2428655 ↗
65. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000023710.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000237 ↗
66. 10.5194/nhess-19-399-201910.5194/nhess-19-399-2019 ↗
67. 10.3390/rs604276510.3390/rs6042765 ↗
68. Mei, Q., and Gu, M., 2020. Multi-level feature fusion in densely connected deep-learning architecture and depth-first search for crack segmentation on images collected with smartphones. Sage Journals, vol. 19 (no 6), 1726–1744. November 2020
69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11939710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119397 ↗
70. 10.1117/12.219570210.1117/12.2195702 ↗
71. 10.1109/IGARSS.2018.851742310.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517423 ↗
72. Mokhtaria S. Wub L. and Yunc H.-B. 2016. Comparison of supervised classification techniques for vision-based pavement crack detection ” in Proc. 95th Annu. Meeting Transp. Res. Board Washington DC USA. 1–17.10.3141/2595-13 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.02010.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.020 ↗
74. 10.3390/s2016458710.3390/s20164587 ↗
75. 10.1155/2019/247073510.1155/2019/2470735 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10524410.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105244 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.10636310.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106363 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.00810.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.008 ↗
79. Nie M. and Wang C 2019. Pavement crack detection based on yolo v3. 2nd International Conference on Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI 2019) Chongqing China. 28–30 November 2019. 327–330.10.1109/IICSPI48186.2019.9095956 ↗
80. Oliveira H. 2013. Crack detection and characterization in flexible road pavements using digital image processing. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidade T´ecnica de Lisboa Lisboa Portugal.
81. 10.1109/TITS.2012.220863010.1109/TITS.2012.2208630 ↗
82. 10.3141/2455-0410.3141/2455-04 ↗
83. Pan, Y., et al., 2017. Object-based and supervised detection of potholes and cracks from the pavement images acquired by UAV. Presented at the Tehran’s Joint ISPRS Conf. GI Res., SMPR and EOEC 2017.
84. 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.286552810.1109/JSTARS.2018.2865528 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11909610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119096 ↗
86. 10.1155/2020/881164910.1155/2020/8811649 ↗
87. 10.1109/ICETT.2016.787366210.1109/ICETT.2016.7873662 ↗
88. 10.3390/app1024878810.3390/app10248788 ↗
89. Puan, O.C., Mustaffar, M., and Ling, T.-C, 2007. Automated pavement imaging program (APIP) for pavement cracks classification and quantification. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 19 (Issue 1.
90. Qgis.org 2020. Welcome to the QGIS project (n.d. Accessed 29 July 2020).
91. 10.1117/1.JEI.28.4.04302310.1117/1.JEI.28.4.043023 ↗
92. 10.3390/infrastructures304005810.3390/infrastructures3040058 ↗
93. Redmon J. and Farhadi A 2017. YOLO9000: better faster stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR 2017 Honolulu HI USA 21–26 July 2017.10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 ↗
94. Redmon J. and Farhadi A 2018. YOLOv3: an incremental improvement. arXiv arXiv:1804.02767.
95. Redmon J. and Farhadi A. 2018. YOLOv3: an incremental improvement arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767.
96. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
97. 10.1590/S2238-1031201400020000910.1590/S2238-10312014000200009 ↗
98. 10.3390/info1112056810.3390/info11120568 ↗
99. 10.3390/app1012415710.3390/app10124157 ↗
100. 10.3846/bjrbe.2015.1910.3846/bjrbe.2015.19 ↗