Learning Symmetries in Datasets
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigate how symmetries present in datasets affect the structure of the latent space learned by Variational Autoencoders (VAEs). Understanding symmetries in data is essential because symmetries determine the true degrees of freedom, constrain generalization, and provide physically interpretable coordinates. We therefore study whether a standard, non-equivariant VAE can reveal symmetry-induced dimensional reduction directly from data, without imposing the symmetry in the architecture. By training VAEs on data originating from simple mechanical systems and particle collisions, we analyze the organization of the latent space through a relevance measure that identifies the most meaningful latent directions. We show that when symmetries or approximate symmetries are present, the VAE self-organizes its latent space, effectively compressing the data along a reduced number of latent variables. This behavior captures the intrinsic dimensionality determined by the symmetry constraints and reveals hidden relations among the features. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical analysis of a simple toy model, demonstrating how, under idealized conditions, the latent space aligns with the symmetry directions of the data manifold. We illustrate these findings with examples ranging from two-dimensional datasets with O(2) symmetry to realistic datasets from electron–positron and proton–proton collisions. Our results highlight the potential of unsupervised generative models to expose underlying structures in data and offer a novel approach to symmetry discovery without explicit supervision.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Quantum many-body systems · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC), Universidad de Valencia-CSIC, E-46980 Valencia, Spain
Funding
Generalitat Valenciana · AEI · Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion · MCIU/AEI
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Symmetry meets AI10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.1.014 ↗
2. Exploring how a generative AI interprets music10.1007/s00521-024-09956-9 ↗
3. Cohen, T.S., and Welling, M. (2016, January 19–24). Group equivariant convolutional networks. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), New York City, NY, USA.
4. InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Nets
5. Higgins, I., Matthey, L., Pal, A., Burgess, C., Glorot, X., Botvinick, M., Mohamed, S., and Lerchner, A. (2017, January 24–26). beta-VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework. Proceedings of the ICLR, Toulon, France.
6. Kim, H., and Mnih, A. (2018, January 10–15). Disentangling by Factorizing. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Stockholm, Sweden.
7. Chen, R.T.Q., Li, X., Grosse, R.B., and Duvenaud, D.K. (2018, January 3–8). Isolating Sources of Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoders. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), Montreal, QC, Canada.
8. Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Lucic, M., Rätsch, G., Gelly, S., Schölkopf, B., and Bachem, O. (2019, January 10–15). Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Long Beach, CA, USA.
9. Hypergraph-Based Model for Modelling Multi-agent Q-Learning Dynamics in Public Goods Games10.1109/TNSE.2024.3473941 ↗
10. Yang, J., Dehmamy, N., Walters, R., and Yu, R. (2024, January 21–27). Latent Space Symmetry Discovery. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Vienna, Austria.
11. Bogatskiy, A., Hoffman, T., Miller, D.W., and Offermann, J.T. (2022). PELICAN: Permutation equivariant and Lorentz invariant or covariant aggregator network for particle physics. arXiv.
12. Lorentz group equivariant autoencoders10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11633-5 ↗
13. Symmetries, safety, and self-supervision10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.6.188 ↗
14. Better latent spaces for better autoencoders10.21468/SciPostPhys.11.3.061 ↗
15. Roberts, A., Engel, J., Raffel, C., Hawthorne, C., and Eck, D. (2019). A Hierarchical Latent Vector Model for Learning Long-Term Structure in Music. arXiv.
16. Discovering Physical Concepts with Neural Networks10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.010508 ↗
17. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079 ↗
18. The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations10.1007/JHEP07(2018)185 ↗
19. Jolliffe, I.T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis, Springer. [2nd ed.].
20. Neural Networks and Principal Component Analysis: Learning from Examples without Local Minima10.1016/0893-6080(89)90014-2 ↗
21. Falorsi, L., De Haan, P., Davidson, T., and Forré, P. (May, January 30). Reparameterizing Distributions on Lie Groups. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
22. Falorsi, L., Forré, P., De Haan, P., and Cohen, T. (2019, January 10–15). Explorations in Homeomorphic Variational Auto-Encoding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Long Beach, CA, USA.
23. Tishby, N., and Zaslavsky, N. (May, January 26). Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principle. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW), Jerusalem, Israel.10.1109/ITW.2015.7133169 ↗
24. Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks10.1126/science.1127647 ↗
25. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2014, January 14–16). Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Banff, AB, Canada.
26. Bronstein, M.M., Bruna, J., Cohen, T., and Veličković, P. (2021). Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gauges. arXiv.
27. Falorsi, L., de Haan, P., Davidson, T.R., De Cao, N., Weiler, M., Forré, P., and Cohen, T.S. (2018). Explorations in Homeomorphic Variational Auto-Encoding. arXiv.
28. Rezende, D.J., and Mohamed, S. (2015, January 6–11). Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
29. Dinh, L., Sohl-Dickstein, J., and Bengio, S. (2016). Density Estimation Using Real NVP. arXiv.
30. Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. arXiv.
31. Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D.P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., and Poole, B. (2021, January 3–7). Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Vienna, Austria.