Quality in the Era of Industry 4.0—Quality Management Principles in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic development of Industry 4.0 technologies, referred to as smart manufacturing technologies (SMTs), is significantly changing both production systems and quality management practices. The aim of this article is to analyse the impact of smart manufacturing technologies on the seven principles of quality management (QMP). The research is based on a narrative, semi-systematic review of the literature from the Web of Science and Scopus databases from the last seven years, using thematic analysis. Traditional interpretations of QMP principles were compared with new conditions resulting from the implementation of technologies such as the Internet of Things, big data, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, vision systems, virtual and augmented reality, and additive manufacturing. The results indicate that SMTs do not eliminate quality management principles, but significantly change the way they are implemented. There is a shift towards product personalisation, shorter product life cycles, decentralised decision-making, flexible and autonomous processes, digital surveillance, and intensive use of real-time data. The article argues that SMT and QMP are complementary approaches—technologies increase the effectiveness and efficiency of quality management, but do not replace it. The considerations presented here are a starting point for further empirical research on the new ‘Quality 4.0’ model in the intelligent manufacturing environment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Transformation in Industry · Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Piotrowo 3, 60-138 Poznan, Poland
Funding
Poznan University of Technology
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. More than a feeling? Toward a theory of customer delight10.1108/JOSM-03-2019-0094 ↗
2. Four decades of research on quality: Summarising, Trendspotting and looking ahead10.1080/14783363.2019.1655397 ↗
3. Dahlgaard, J.J., Kanji, G.K., and Kristensen, K. (1997). Fundamentals of Total Quality Management, Routledge.10.1007/978-1-4899-7110-4 ↗
4. The New EFQM Model: What Is Really New and Could Be Considered as a Suitable Tool with Respect to Quality 4.0 Concept10.12776/qip.v24i1.1415 ↗
5. Impact of TQM on company’s performance10.1108/02656710910924152 ↗
6. Investigating changes of total quality management principles in the context of Industry 4.0: Viewpoint from an emerging economy10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122358 ↗
7. Jose, S.A., Tonner, A., Feliciano, M., Roy, T., Shackleford, A., and Menezes, P.L. (2025). Smart Manufacturing for High-Performance Materials. Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18102255 ↗
8. Mechanical Engineering in Industry 4.0
9. Scanning the Industry 4.0, A literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing Systems
10. Alaref, E.A., and Khan, S.A. (2022). Industry 4.0 and its Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 13–16 December 2021, IEEE.10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9672847 ↗
11. Internet of Things (IoT): A Literature Review10.4236/jcc.2015.35021 ↗
12. Customer Profiling Method with Big Data based on BDT and Clustering for Sales Prediction
13. Li, X., Tu, Z., Quanchao, J., Man, X., Wang, H., and Zang, X. (2017, January 20–22). Deep-level Quality Management Based on Big Data Analytics with Case Study. Proceedings of the Conference: Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China.10.1109/CAC.2017.8243651 ↗
14. Industrial Cyberphysical Systems: Realizing Cloud-Based Big Data Infrastructures10.1109/MIE.2017.2788850 ↗
15. Kah, J., Seng, P., Li-minn, K., Peter, E., and Mmonyi, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning for Multimedia and Edge Information Processing. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11142239 ↗
16. Applications of artificial intelligence in intelligent manufacturing: A review10.1631/FITEE.1601885 ↗
17. A Systematic Review of Tools Available in the Field of Augmented Reality10.4018/JCIT.296719 ↗
18. Górski, F., Wichniarek, R., Kuczko, W., Zukowska, M., Lulkiewicz, M., and Zawadzki, P. (2018). Experimental Studies on 3D Printing of Automatically Designed Customized Wrist-Hand Orthoses. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13184091 ↗
19. Rosário, A.T., and Dias, J.C. (2023). How Industry 4.0 and Sensors Can Leverage Product Design: Opportunities and Challenges. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23031165 ↗
20. Cyber Physical Systems Role in Manufacturing Technologies10.1063/1.5034337 ↗
21. Zairi, M. (2017). Deep in Crisis. The Uncertain Future of the Quality Profession, European Centre for Best Practice Management.
22. Understanding music streaming services via text mining of online customer reviews10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101145 ↗
23. Mourtzis, D., Fotia, S., and Boli, N. (2017, January 27–29). Metrics definition for the Product-Service System Complexity within Mass Customization and Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Madeira Island, Portugal.10.1109/ICE.2017.8280013 ↗
24. Tomohiko, S., and Abhijna, M. (2020). A Product/Service System Design Schema: Application to Big Data Analytics. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083484 ↗
25. Yi, M., Huang, Z., and Yu, Y. (2022). Creating a Sustainable E-Commerce Environment: The Impact of Product Configurator Interaction Design on Consumer Personalized Customization Experience. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142315903 ↗
26. Augmented reality based approach for on-line quality assessment of polished surfaces10.1016/j.rcim.2019.04.007 ↗
27. Dovleac, R., Ionica, A., and Leba, M. (2022). Knowledge Management Embedded in Agile Methodology for Quality 4.0. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 13–16 December 2021, IEEE.10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9673045 ↗
28. A critical review of Knowledge-Based Engineering: An identification of research challenges10.1016/j.aei.2011.06.004 ↗
29. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
30. Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420 ↗
31. Additive manufacturing and the global factory: Disruptive technologies and the location of the international business10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.04.003 ↗
32. Contributions of Industry 4.0 to quality management—A SCORE perspective
33. Systematic improving business processes by implementing agile10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0422 ↗
34. The impact of 3D printing on the humanitarian supply chain10.1080/09537287.2020.1834130 ↗
35. Industry 4.0 smart reconfigurable manufacturing machines10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.001 ↗
36. Quality management in the 21st century enterprises: Research pathway towards Industry 4.010.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.005 ↗
37. ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0
38. Quality Control 4.0:Away to improve the quality performance and engage shop floor operators10.1108/IJQRM-05-2021-0138 ↗
39. The evolution of quality: From inspection to Quality 4.0
40. Industry 4.0, quality management and TQM world: A systematic literature review and a proposed agenda for further research10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0082 ↗
41. Weckenmann, A., Bodi, S., Popescu, S., Dragomir, M., Hurgoiu, D., and Comes, R. (2019). Hit or Miss? Evaluating the Potential of a Research Niche: A Case Study in the Field of Virtual Quality Management. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11051450 ↗
42. Baran, E., and Korkusuz Polat, T. (2022). Classification of Industry 4.0 for Total Quality Management. A Review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14063329 ↗
43. Quality management practices in the era of industry 4.0
44. The Quality Manager in the Industry 4.0 Era. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
45. Data-driven smart manufacturing10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.006 ↗
46. Foidl, H., and Felderer, M. (2020). Research Challenges of Industry 4.0 for Quality Management, University of Innsbruck, Institute for Computer Science.
47. Industry 4.0 triggered by Lean Thinking: Insights from a systematic literature review10.1080/00207543.2020.1832274 ↗
48. Sorqvist, L. (2014, January 9–22). Future development of the quality profession. Proceedings of the ICQ’14, Tokyo, Japan.
49. Quality 4.0—The challenging future of quality engineering10.1080/08982112.2019.1706744 ↗
50. Eleftheriadis, R.J., and Myklebust, O. (2016, January 10–11). A Quality Pathway to Digitalization in Manufacturing thru Zero Defect Manufacturing Practices. Proceedings of the International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation (IWAMA), Manchester, UK.10.2991/iwama-16.2016.35 ↗
51. Quality Management Evolution from the Past to Present: Challenges for Tomorrow10.2478/orga-2019-0011 ↗
52. Quality Management in Industry 4.0 Era
53. Changing quality initiative–does the quality profile really change?10.1080/14783363.2012.707868 ↗
54. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review10.1111/1467-8551.00375 ↗
55. Writing narrative literature reviews10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311 ↗
56. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples10.1177/1534484305278283 ↗
57. Olejnik, I., and Antoniak, M.A. (2024). Literature review method: Characteristics, typologies, directions of development. Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Examples of Applications in Economics and Management, Poznań University of Economics. (In Polish).
58. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 ↗
59. Mulder, P. (2025, March 03). Heuristic Method. Available online: https://www.toolshero.com/problem-solving/heuristic-method.
60. Using thematic analysis in psychology10.1191/1478088706qp063oa ↗
61. How to prioritize perceived quality attributes from consumers’ perspective? Analysis through social media data10.1007/s10660-022-09652-7 ↗
62. A higher satisfaction product customization method for different customer groups10.1007/s11042-023-15332-x ↗
63. Building a New Culture for Qality Management in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution10.1080/14783363.2017.1310703 ↗
64. Toward an understanding of industry commoditization: Its nature and role in evolving marketing competition10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.10.001 ↗
65. Hamrol, A., Grabowska, M., and Starzyńska, B. (2025). Consumers’ Willingness to Adopt Pro-Environmental Attitudes. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17135948 ↗
66. Dostatni, E., Rojek, I., and Hamrol, A. (2017). The Use of Machine Learning Method in Concurrent Ecodesign of Products and Technological Processes. Advances in Manufacturing, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_31 ↗
67. Concepts of Self-Repairing Systems10.1177/0020294013492285 ↗
68. Benbow, D., Berger, R., Elshennawy, A., and Walker, H. (2003). The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook, ASQ Quality Press.
69. Bass, B.M. (2006). Transformational Leadership, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410617095 ↗
70. Mindfulness as substitute for transformational leadership10.1108/JMP-07-2016-0223 ↗
71. Are QM models aligned with Industry 4.0?A perspective on current practices10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120820 ↗
72. Agile Innovation Through Business Process Management: Realizing the Potential of Digital Transformation10.1007/978-3-031-11510-3_2 ↗
73. Designing a quality scorecard (QSC) for system integration in the era of Industry 4.0
74. Advances in machine learning and IoT for water quality monitoring: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27920 ↗
75. Integrating industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing for a sustainable green transition: A comprehensive model10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142728 ↗
76. Digital Twin-Driven Product Sustainable Design for Low Carbon Footprint10.1115/1.4062427 ↗
77. Duroc, Y. (2022). From Identification to Sensing: RFID Is One of the Key Technologies in the IoT Field. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22197523 ↗
78. Chen, Y., Ding, Y., Zhao, F., Zhang, E., Wu, Z., and Shao, L. (2021). Surface Defect Detection Methods for Industrial Products: A Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167657 ↗
79. Teucke, M., Broda, E., Börold, A., and Freitag, M. (2018). Using Sensor-Based Quality Data in Automotive Supply Chains. Machines, 6.10.3390/machines6040053 ↗
80. Surface Characteristics Measurement Using Computer Vision: A Review
81. Kirchen, K., Schuetz, D., Folmer, J., and Vogel-Heuser, B. (2017). Metrics for the Evaluation of Data Quality of Signal Data in Industrial Processes. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Emden, Germany, 24–26 July 2017, IEEE.10.1109/INDIN.2017.8104878 ↗
82. Castillo, R.P., Carretero, A.G., Rodriguez, M., Caballero, I., and Piattini, M. (2018, January 4–7). Data Quality Best Practices in IoT Environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, Coimbra, Portugal.
83. Quality 4.0: A review of big data challenges in manufacturing
84. Supplier Relationships in the Context of the Sustainable Development Requirements for Production Companies10.35808/ersj/3737 ↗
85. Hagel, J., Seely Brown, J., Kulasooriya, D., and Giffi, C. (2015). The Future of Manufacturing. Making Things in a Changing World, Deloitte University Press.