Directional characteristics of traffic polishing effect on pavement skid resistance
Source abstract
Abstract
This study demonstrated that skid resistance testing in traffic direction does not provide a complete evaluation of traffic polishing effect on pavement skid resistance. Directional British pendulum tests were performed on 14 pavement sections involving the following six modes of vehicle operation: (A) Acceleration, (B) Deceleration, (C) Moving from stop, (D) Stopping, (E) Constant-speed cruising, and (F) Cruising without constant-speed setting. Test results confirmed that there were statistically significant differential directional polishing effects in practically all modes of vehicle operation. The relative magnitudes of polishing action of different modes were evaluated. The strongest polishing effects were produced by mode A in the against-traffic direction, and mode B in the traffic direction. The next stronger polishing effect was achieved by the combined mode (C + D) in the traffic as well as the against-traffic direction. Comparatively, the lowest polishing effect was produced by modes E and F, in either the traffic or against-traffic direction. Test results also revealed different polishing directions and magnitudes caused by driving and driven wheels. Driving wheels were found to produce significantly stronger polishing effect than driven wheels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chang’an University
National University of Singapore
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2010.3(6).29510.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2010.3(6).295 ↗
2. ASTM E1911-98, 2002. Standard test Method for measuring Paved surface Frictional Properties using the Dynamic friction tester. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3. ASTM E2883-13, 2019. Standard Guide for evaluation and Calibration, Continuous friction measurement equipment (CFME). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
4. ASTM E303-93, 2018. Standard test Method for measuring surface Frictional Properties using the British pendulum tester. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
5. BSI, 2000. BS 7941-2:2000 Methods for measuring the skid resistance of pavement surfaces test method for measurement of surface skid resistance using the GripTester braked wheel fixed slip device. London: British Standards Institute.
6. BSI, 2011. BS EN 13036-4 road and airfield surface characteristics. test methods for measurement of slip/skid resistance of a surface. The pendulum test. London: British Standards Institute.
7. 10.1177/036119811985145310.1177/0361198119851453 ↗
8. 10.3390/app1001003210.3390/app10010032 ↗
9. Friel S. Kane M. and Woodward D 2013. Use of Wehner Schulze to predict skid resistance of Irish surfacing materials. In Airfield and Highway Pavement 2013: Sustainable and Efficient Pavements (pp. 817-828).10.1061/9780784413005.067 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(420)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(420) ↗
11. 10.1080/14680629.2019.161836610.1080/14680629.2019.1618366 ↗
12. Hall J. W. et al. 2009. Guide for pavement friction. NCHRP. Web-only document 108. Contractor’s inal Report NCHRP Project 01-43. Transportation Research Board of the National Academes.
13. Heitzman M. Gu F. and Welderufael A. 2019. Three Wheel Polishing Device and Dynamic Friction Tester Accelerated Laboratory Friction Testing Repeatability and Reproducibility Study (No. 19-05).
14. Henry, J.J., 2000. Evaluation of pavement friction characteristics (Vol. 291). Washington: Transportation Research Board. National Research Council.
15. Liang R. Y. 2013. Long term validation of an accelerated polishing test procedure for HMA pavements (No. FHWA/OH-2013/3). Ohio. Dept. of Transportation.
16. 10.1520/JTE1142810.1520/JTE11428 ↗
17. 10.1080/10298436.2020.178802910.1080/10298436.2020.1788029 ↗
18. 10.3141/2457-1110.3141/2457-11 ↗
19. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138551110.1080/14680629.2017.1385511 ↗
20. 10.3846/enviro.2014.17910.3846/enviro.2014.179 ↗
21. 10.1177/036119811882159810.1177/0361198118821598 ↗