Utilising cement kiln dust as a sustainable cementitious alternative for recycled asphalt pavement materials: a mechanical, economic, and environmental study
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the mechanical, microstructural, and environmental performance of recycled asphalt pavement materials stabilised with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) and cement kiln dust (CKD) as sustainable alternatives for full-depth reclamation (FDR) applications. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS), indirect tensile strength (ITS), flexural strength (FS), resilient modulus (MR), and wet–dry durability were evaluated for various reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) blends. Results showed that CKD at 15% maximised strength, the UCS increased up to 9.7 times compared to unstabilised blends and matched 3% OPC in up to 80% RAP blends, with similar ITS, FS, and MR trends before declining at higher dosages. However, CKD mixtures exhibited greater strength loss under wet–dry cycles than OPC mixes. Microstructural analysis revealed cementitious product formation, microstructural densification, elevated chloride/alkali content, and chloro-aluminate hydrates that explain CKD's performance limits. Lifecycle assessment showed CKD can cut CO₂ emissions by up to 89% and reduced costs by 36% versus OPC, supporting its use as a sustainable stabiliser in low- to medium-traffic FDR designs when properly dosed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Horus University
Mansoura University
Tanta University
Funding
Science and Technology Development Fund
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/su1607300110.3390/su16073001 ↗
2. 10.3390/su1412702210.3390/su14127022 ↗
3. 10.3390/min1408075010.3390/min14080750 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.00210.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10319910.1016/j.rineng.2024.103199 ↗
6. 10.5194/essd-10-195-201810.5194/essd-10-195-2018 ↗
7. Asphalt Institute. (1981). Thickness design: Asphalt pavements for highways and streets Manual series No. 1 (MS-1) US Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 81-68616.
8. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.00410.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.004 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10180910.1016/j.jobe.2020.101809 ↗
10. 10.3390/geotechnics302001110.3390/geotechnics3020011 ↗
11. Bang S. Lein W. Comes B. Nehl L. Anderson J. Kraft P. deStigter M. Leibrock C. Roberts L. Sebaaly P. & Huft D. (2011). Quality base material produced using full depth reclamation on existing asphalt pavement structure – Task 4: Development of FDR mix design guide. Final Report FHWA-HIF-12-015. US Department of Transportation Washington DC.
12. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.01110.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011 ↗
13. Bhatty, J. I. (1995). Alternative uses of cement kiln dust (pp. 1–17). Portland Cement Association.
14. Button J. W. (2003). Kiln dust for stabilization of pavement base and subgrade materials. Texas Transportation Institute College Station Texas TTI-2003-1.
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13746610.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137466 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11713910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117139 ↗
17. 10.3141/2524-1510.3141/2524-15 ↗
18. 10.1080/19648189.2015.103008810.1080/19648189.2015.1030088 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000047210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000472 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00090-310.1016/S0304-3894(97)00090-3 ↗
21. ECP-104. (2018). Egyptian code of practice for urban and rural roads. Housing and Building National Central Research Cairo Egypt.
22. 10.1061/9780784412121.39510.1061/9780784412121.395 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.21210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.212 ↗
24. 10.1080/10298436.2020.175441610.1080/10298436.2020.1754416 ↗
25. 10.3390/su13191076010.3390/su131910760 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12054010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120540 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.22210.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.222 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.10001910.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100019 ↗
30. Halsted G. E. Luhr D. R. & Adaska W. S. (2006). Guide to cement-treated base (CTB).
31. 10.3390/ma1406135910.3390/ma14061359 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.24310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.243 ↗
33. 10.3390/en1507270810.3390/en15072708 ↗
34. Jacott M. & Comunes F. (2003 February). Energy use in the cement industry in North America: Emissions waste generation and pollution control 1990-2001. In 2nd North American symposium on assessing the environmental effects of trade Mexico City United States.
35. 10.1061/40838(191)7010.1061/40838(191)70 ↗
36. 10.1109/28.37029210.1109/28.370292 ↗
37. 10.3390/coatings1405057310.3390/coatings14050573 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0344710.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03447 ↗
39. 10.1061/41127(382)38710.1061/41127(382)387 ↗
40. Liu W. & Scullion T. (2011). Flexible pavement design system FPS 19W: User's manual (TxDOT Research Report 0-1869-1). Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System.
41. Mackos R. Butalia T. Wolfe W. & Walker H. W. (2009). Use of lime-activated class F fly ash in the full depth reclamation of asphalt pavements: Environmental aspects. In Proceedings of world of coal ash conference (Vol. 9 pp. 878–892).
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.01010.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.21210.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.212 ↗
44. Mousa, E., Fouad, M., El-Naga, I. A., El-Sekelly, E. A., & El-Ashwah, A. S. (2025a). Alkali-activated binders for recycled asphalt aggregate materials: A sustainable Portland cement alternative. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.
45. 10.1080/14680629.2025.254596910.1080/14680629.2025.2545969 ↗
46. 10.56330/JZNX570910.56330/JZNX5709 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.25610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.256 ↗
48. 10.1002/ep.67017031110.1002/ep.670170311 ↗
49. 10.59957/jctm.v59.i6.2024.810.59957/jctm.v59.i6.2024.8 ↗
50. Reeder G. D. Harrington D. S. Ayers M. E. & Adaska W. (2017). Guide to full-depth reclamation (FDR) with cement. National Concrete Pavement Technology Center Institute for Transportation Iowa State University. 96. Report No. SR1006P.7.
51. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818961-0.00018-110.1016/B978-0-12-818961-0.00018-1 ↗
52. 10.1111/jiec.1205310.1111/jiec.12053 ↗
53. 10.1061/9780784413272.35610.1061/9780784413272.356 ↗
54. 10.1061/JPEODX.000016910.1061/JPEODX.0000169 ↗
55. Sebesta S. Taylor R. & Scullion T. (2019). Best practices for implementing FDR for pavements in the energy sector (No. FHWA/TX-17/5-6271-05-R1 Report 5-6271-05-R1). Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
56. 10.3390/environments610011310.3390/environments6100113 ↗
57. 10.3390/environments610011310.3390/environments6100113 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.006 ↗
59. 10.1007/0-387-28098-710.1007/0-387-28098-7 ↗
60. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00262-810.1016/S0008-8846(99)00262-8 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.01010.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.010 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.00110.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.001 ↗
63. 10.3390/ma1704083310.3390/ma17040833 ↗
64. 10.17226/1456810.17226/14568 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.06110.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.061 ↗
66. 10.3141/1819b-0210.3141/1819b-02 ↗
67. 10.3141/1652-3310.3141/1652-33 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
69. Walls J. & Smith M. R. (1998). Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design: Interim technical bulletin (No. FHWA-SA-98-079) United States. Federal Highway Administration.
70. Wang, K., Konsta-Gdoutos, M. S., & Shah, S. P. (2002). Hydration, rheology, and strength of ordinary Portland (OPC)-cement kiln dust (CKD)-slag binders. American Concrete Institute Materials Journal, 99(2), 173–170.
71. 10.3141/1869-0510.3141/1869-05 ↗
72. Wimett J. & Du M. (2022). Statistical analysis of DCP data to evaluate resilient modulus of reclaimed stabilized base. Multiple locations Vermont (No. 2022-03). Agency of Transportation Vermont.
73. Wolfe W. Butalia T. S. & Walker H. (2009). Full-depth reclamation of asphalt pavements using lime-activated Class F fly ash: Structural monitoring aspects. In 2009 World of Coal Ash Conference Lexington KY.
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.006 ↗
75. 10.3389/feart.2025.155481210.3389/feart.2025.1554812 ↗
76. 10.1038/s41598-025-03635-y10.1038/s41598-025-03635-y ↗