journal article·2026-02-12Open access

Finite-Difference Analysis of a Quasi-3D Wave-Driven Flow Model: Stability, Grid Structure and Parameter Sensitivity

Gabriela Gic-Grusza, Piotr Szeląg

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Wave-driven free-surface flows pose numerical challenges due to tensorial radiation stress forcing, anisotropic diffusion, and strong sensitivity to closure parameters. This paper investigates the numerical behavior of a quasi-3D wave-driven flow model using a coupled depth-integrated (2D) solver with a diagnostic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction employed for consistency verification to evaluate the validity of dimensional reduction. The scheme is implemented on a staggered Arakawa C-grid with a terrain-following vertical coordinate and explicit pseudo-time-stepping, which enables the direct assessment of stability limits. A reference experiment and systematic sensitivity tests are performed for three idealized bathymetries of increasing complexity. Bottom friction primarily controls the free-surface response, with critical thresholds (e.g., f≳0.03) identified via the free-surface displacement Z as markers for the onset of numerical stiffness. Horizontal eddy viscosity Nh has a weak influence on depth-integrated transport over most of the tested range, whereas vertical eddy viscosity Nv governs both transport magnitude and stability through the vertical diffusion constraint, acting as the primary bottleneck for computational efficiency. A stability map in the (Nv,Δt,Nz) space is provided to delineate stable, marginal, and unstable regimes identifying an optimal vertical resolution of Nz≈10 for coastal applications. Grid resolution experiments quantify convergence trends and show that sensitivity increases with bathymetric complexity, revealing that bathymetric aliasing in multi-bar systems can lead to errors of up to 20% if gradients are under-resolved. Finally, a consistent set of diagnostic metrics is proposed for comparing 2D solutions with their vertically resolved counterparts, establishing a validity envelope where 2D models remain reliable versus regimes where explicit vertical shear resolution is mandatory. The results provide a practical roadmap for parameter selection, ensuring numerical robustness in complex, mechanically forced free-surface CFD applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Coastal and Marine Dynamics · Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes · Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Częstochowa University of Technology, 69 J.H. Dąbrowskiego Street, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Application of CFD to environmental flows10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00013-6 ↗
2. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) applications in Floating Offshore Wind Turbine (FOWT) dynamics: A review10.1016/j.apor.2024.104075 ↗
3. Review of Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Treatment edited by Xiaofeng Liu and Jie Zhang10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001724 ↗
4. Radiation stress in water waves; a physical discussion with applications
5. A note on the vertical distribution of momentum transport in water waves10.1515/ohs-2015-0053 ↗
6. Gic-Grusza, G. (2024). The Three-Dimensional Wave-Induced Current Field: An Analytical Model. Water, 16.10.3390/w16081165 ↗
7. A rational model for Langmuir circulations10.1017/S0022112076001420 ↗
8. The three-dimensional current and surface wave equations10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<1978:TTCASW>2.0.CO;2 ↗
9. On the influence of collinear surface waves on turbulence in smooth-bed open-channel flows10.1017/jfm.2021.605 ↗
10. Gic-Grusza, G. (2025). Numerical Modeling of the Three-Dimensional Wave-Induced Current Field. Water, 17.10.3390/w17091336 ↗
11. Wave and Roller Transformation Over Barred Bathymetry10.1029/2023JC020413 ↗
12. Turbulent characteristics of free surface and velocity transition from free hydraulic jump to open-channel flow10.1063/5.0256532 ↗
13. Computational Design of the Basic Dynamical Processes of the UCLA General Circulation Model
14. Comparison of unstructured, staggered grid methods for the shallow water equations10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.12.004 ↗
15. Performance Comparison of the A-Grid and C-Grid Shallow-Water Models on Icosahedral Grids10.1177/10943420221139509 ↗
16. Implementation of a brittle sea ice rheology in an Eulerian, finite-difference, C-grid modeling framework: Impact on the simulated deformation of sea ice in the Arctic10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024 ↗
17. CICE on a C-grid: New momentum, stress, and transport schemes for CICEv6.510.5194/gmd-17-6703-2024 ↗
18. Bu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhu, S., Zhang, W., Cao, G., and Ding, Z. (2025). Development of generalized terrain-following FVCOM model for the steep terrain seas. Front. Mar. Sci., 12.10.3389/fmars.2025.1441840 ↗
19. Evaluation of horizontal gradients in sigma-coordinate shallow water models10.1080/07055900.1996.9649574 ↗
20. A New Approach to Implement Sigma Coordinate in a Numerical Model10.4208/cicp.030311.230911a ↗
21. Ferziger, J.H., Perić, M., and Street, R.L. (2020). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-99693-6 ↗
22. Fletcher, C.A.J. (1991). Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics 1, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-642-58239-4_1 ↗
23. Explicit Time Marching Methods for the Time-Dependent Euler Computations10.1006/jcph.1996.5577 ↗
24. Explicit time marching method with enhanced stability10.1103/PhysRevE.110.045302 ↗
25. Surprisingly tight Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition in explicit high-order Arakawa schemes10.1063/5.0223009 ↗
26. An optimal spatial-filtering method derived from eigenvalue perturbation for extending the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy stability limit10.1190/geo2022-0636.1 ↗
27. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions10.1029/98JC02622 ↗
28. Rip currents in the non-tidal surf zone with sandbars: Numerical analysis versus field measurements10.1016/j.oceano.2020.02.001 ↗