Reliability study on fracture and fatigue behavior of pavement materials using SCB specimen
Source abstract
Abstract
Reliability of semi-circular bending (SCB) specimen for measuring the fracture behaviour of pavement materials under static and cyclic loadings has been examined. This study is divided into three phases. In the first phase a comparison between different equations suggested by several specifications and by researchers has been made. Three different SCB specimen types used for predicting mixed mode fracture behaviour of pavement materials have been evaluated in the second phase. In the third phase the applicability of using SCB specimen in predicting fatigue crack growth rate in pavement materials under mode I has been examined. 3-D finite element analysis (FEA) has been adopted.Although there is conformity of the specimen dimensions there is no unique equation to measure the fracture parameters. The prediction of the fracture behaviour of pavement materials obtained by the present FEA is acceptable. The value of KIC predicted from each specimen type has been examined for its reliability by using the concept of maximum size of non-damaged defect (dmax). Mode I fracture toughness predicted by SCB-1 (standard specimen) is the only consistent value, while SCB-2 and SCB-3 (specimens with shifted crack) failed in this reliability test. To check the reliability of SCB specimen for measuring the fatigue behaviour of pavement materials, the relation between the stress intensity factor range (ΔK) and the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) through the whole life of the specimen has been examined. A good relation is found between the CMOD and the ΔK through the whole life of SCB specimen.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
On sabbatical leave from Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Funding
Deanship of Scientific Research · Jazan University
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS, 2016. Analysis of the user’s manual. Version 2016. DassaultSystèmes.
2. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.005 ↗
3. 10.1007/s40069-015-0117-410.1007/s40069-015-0117-4 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0001877810.1007/BF00018778 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.01910.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.07.019 ↗
6. 10.2495/HPSM12027110.2495/HPSM120271 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.009 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12517-013-1037-810.1007/s12517-013-1037-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.09710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.097 ↗
10. 10.12989/sem.2012.43.6.82310.12989/sem.2012.43.6.823 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.02210.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.022 ↗
12. 10.1111/ffe.1247410.1111/ffe.12474 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00603-011-0167-010.1007/s00603-011-0167-0 ↗
14. Aliha M.R.M. · 2007
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.09.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.09.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.03.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.03.018 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00024-016-1458-x10.1007/s00024-016-1458-x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.09310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.093 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.015 ↗
21. 10.1111/ffe.1240810.1111/ffe.12408 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.00210.1016/j.msea.2005.11.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.10.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.06.01110.1016/j.compgeo.2015.06.011 ↗
25. EN 12697-44. · 2010
26. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.011 ↗
27. Fakhri M. · Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale · 2018 · 12 · 113
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.02.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.02.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.029 ↗
30. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81283510.1080/14680629.2013.812835 ↗
31. 10.1617/2912143772.03110.1617/2912143772.031 ↗
32. Hossiney N. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2010 · 3 · 251
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.07.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.07.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.10010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.100 ↗
35. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90030-V10.1016/0013-7944(93)90030-V ↗
36. Lipson C · 1973
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.13010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.130 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.02.011 ↗
39. 10.5267/j.esm.2017.8.00110.5267/j.esm.2017.8.001 ↗
40. Mousa, S. et al., 2018. Fracture behavior of roll bonded Al-brass-Al multilayer composites – concept of the maximum undamaged defect size (dmax). Structural Integrity Procedia, In Press.10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.114 ↗
41. Mubaraki M. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2013 · 6 · 8
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.10510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.105 ↗
43. 10.1080/10298436.2015.109590910.1080/10298436.2015.1095909 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.144 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.007 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2017.07.004 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.035 ↗
48. 10.3923/ajmskr.2012.34.4410.3923/ajmskr.2012.34.44 ↗
49. 10.1007/s13369-014-1400-410.1007/s13369-014-1400-4 ↗
50. 10.1520/JTE2013009310.1520/JTE20130093 ↗
51. Tada H · 1985
52. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.10.00410.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.10.004 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.020 ↗
54. Van de Ven M. · 1997
55. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.012 ↗
56. 10.1007/s00603-015-0855-210.1007/s00603-015-0855-2 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.09.00410.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.09.004 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.02610.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.026 ↗
59. Wei, M.D. et al., 2018. A further improved maximum tangential stress criterion for assessing mode I fracture of rocks considering non-singular stress terms of the Williams expansion. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, In Press.10.1007/s00603-018-1524-z ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.045 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.01210.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.012 ↗
62. Yu L · 2009