Enhancing the MITRE ATT&CK® Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems Using Insights from Advanced Persistent Threats
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, numerous Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) have carried out cyber-physical attacks on critical infrastructures. Ukraine has been the victim of several advanced campaigns against its power grids, exemplifying a growing trend of disruptive and potentially destructive attacks. Although frameworks like the MITRE ATT&CK® (ATT&CK) document adversaries’ behaviour across various domains, they show limitations in representing the unique characteristics of cyber-physical attacks. Existing models often fail to capture the integration of physical processes, system states, and domain-specific impacts that are essential to understand threats in cyber-physical environments. This gap hinders the ability to fully model how APTs exploit physical components alongside cyber. This research investigates the limitations of the ATT&CK Industrial Control System (ICS) framework in the context of Cyber-Physical System (CPS). A capability analysis of selected Russian APTs known to target CPS was conducted, resulting in conceptual enhancements to better represent their relevant tactics and techniques. These enhancements were evaluated through semi-structured interviews with cybersecurity professionals. The findings indicate the need for improved representation of interactions in the physical domain, along with greater contextual detail on tactics and techniques. Although the study is exploratory, the enhancements provide a foundation for future research to strengthen CPS threat analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Information and Cyber Security · Network Security and Intrusion Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Deptartment of Information Security and Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway
Norwegian Defence Cyber Academy, Norwegian Defence University College, 2617 Lillehammer, Norway
Funding
Research Council of Norway-funded CORESIM (Context-Based Real-Time OT-IT Systems Integrity Management) project
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. InfraCERT (2024). Trusselvurdering 2024, InfraCERT. Technical Report.
2. Norwegian National Security Authority (2024). Risiko 2024, Norwegian National Security Authority. Technical Report.
3. Knapp, E.D., and Langill, J.T. (2015). Chapter 7—Hacking Industrial Control Systems. Industrial Network Security, Syngress. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-420114-9.00007-1 ↗
4. Przetacznik, J., and Tarpova, S. (2022). Russia’s War on Ukraine: Timeline of Cyber-Attacks, European Parliament. Technical Report.
5. (2024, December 01). 2015 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, Campaign C0028. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/campaigns/C0028/.
6. (2024, December 01). 2016 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, Campaign C0025. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/campaigns/C0025/.
7. (2024, December 01). 2022 Ukraine Electric Power Attack, Campaign C0034. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/campaigns/C0034/.
8. Strom, B.E., Applebaum, A., Miller, D.P., Nickels, K.C., Pennington, A.G., and Thomas, C.B. (2020). MITRE ATT&CK®: Design and Philosophy, MITRE. Technical Report.
9. Dragos Threat Intelligence (2025, February 04). Dragonfly. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G0035/.
10. Dragos Threat Intelligence, and Karabacak, H. (2025, February 02). Sandworm Team. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G0034/.
11. Dragos Threat Intelligence (2025, February 04). TEMP.Veles. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G0088/.
12. Dragos Threat Intelligence (2025, February 04). ALLANITE. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G1000/.
13. Griffor, E.R., Greer, C., Wollman, D.A., and Burns, M.J. (2017). Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems: Volume 1, Overview, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Technical Report NIST SP 1500-201.10.6028/NIST.SP.1500-201 ↗
14. Stouffer, K., Pease, M., Tang, C., Zimmerman, T., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Hahn, A., Saravia, S., Sherule, A., and Thompson, M. (2023). Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security, National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.). Technical Report NIST SP 800-82r3.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-82r3 ↗
15. (2024, December 29). Russia’s FSB Malign Activity: Factsheet, Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/russias-fsb-malign-cyber-activity-factsheet/russias-fsb-malign-activity-factsheet.
16. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, National Security Agency, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Cyber Command Cyber National Mission Force, Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service, Czech Military Intelligence, Czech Republic Security Information Service, and German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (2024). Russian Military Cyber Actors Target U.S. and Global Critical Infrastructure, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Technical Report.
17. Hultquist, J. (2025, February 08). Anticipating Cyber Threats as the Ukraine Crisis Escalates. Available online: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/ukraine-crisis-cyber-threats.
18. Roncone, G., Black, D., Wolfram, J., McLellan, T., Simonian, N., Hall, R., Prokopenkov, A., Jenkins, L., Perez, D., and Aytes, L. (2025, February 08). Unearthing APT44: Russia’s Notorious Cyber Sabotage Unit Sandworm. Available online: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/apt44-unearthing-sandworm.
19. Dragos Inc (2025, February 08). DYMALLOY. Available online: https://www.dragos.com/threat/dymalloy/.
20. Dragos Inc (2025, February 08). ELECTRUM. Available online: https://www.dragos.com/threat/electrum/.
21. Dragos Inc (2025, May 13). KAMACITE Threat Group. Available online: https://www.dragos.com/threat/kamacite/.
22. Dragos Inc (2025, February 08). XENOTIME. Available online: https://www.dragos.com/threat/xenotime/.
23. Dragos Inc (2025, February 08). ALLANITE. Available online: https://www.dragos.com/threat/allanite/.
24. Cluley, G. (2025, February 09). US Warns of Ongoing Attacks on Energy Firms and Critical Infrastructure. Available online: https://www.welivesecurity.com/2017/10/22/us-warns-ongoing-attacks-energy-firms-critical-infrastructure/.
25. Holt, R. (2025, February 09). Sandworm: A Tale of Disruption Told Anew. Available online: https://www.welivesecurity.com/2022/03/21/sandworm-tale-disruption-told-anew/.
26. (2025, February 09). Russian State-Sponsored and Criminal Cyber Threats to Critical Infrastructure, Available online: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-110a.
27. Advanced Persistent Threat Kill Chain for Cyber-Physical Power Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3507386 ↗
28. Hutchins, E.M., and Cloppert, M.J. (2025). The Industrial Control System Cyber Kill Chain, SANS Institute. Technical Report.
29. (2025, May 21). Cyber Kill Chain®. Available online: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/cyber/cyber-kill-chain.html.
30. Two-stage advanced persistent threat (APT) attack on an IEC 61850 power grid substation10.1007/s10207-024-00856-6 ↗
31. (2023). Communication Networks and Systems for Power Utility Automation (Standard No. IEC 61850 Series).
32. Askoxylakis, I., Ioannidis, S., Katsikas, S., and Meadows, C. (2016). On Attacker Models and Profiles for Cyber-Physical Systems. Proceedings of the Computer Security—ESORICS 2016, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-45744-4 ↗
33. Akbarzadeh, A., Erdodi, L., Houmb, S.H., Soltvedt, T.G., and Muggerud, H.K. (2023). Attacking IEC 61850 Substations by Targeting the PTP Protocol. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12122596 ↗
34. Ahmad, S., Ahn, B., Alvee, S.R.B., Trevino, D., Kim, T., Youn, Y.W., and Ryu, M.H. (2022). Advanced Persistent Threat (APT)-Style Attack Modeling and Testbed for Power Transformer Diagnosis System in a Substation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), IEEE.10.1109/ISGT50606.2022.9817518 ↗
35. Zhang, M., and Zonouz, S. (2024). Control Corruption without Firmware Infection: Stealthy Supply Chain Attacks via PLC Hardware Implants (MalTag). Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE 15th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), IEEE.10.1109/ICCPS61052.2024.00029 ↗
36. De Decker, B., and Zúquete, A. (2014). A Study on Advanced Persistent Threats. Communications and Multimedia Security, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44885-4 ↗
37. Survey of publicly available reports on advanced persistent threat actors10.1016/j.cose.2017.08.005 ↗
38. Solheim, I., and Stølen, K. (2007). Technology Research Explained, SINTEF ICT. Technical Report.
39. Ormrod, J.E., and Leedy, P.D. (2021). Practical Research: Planning and Design, Pearson Education. [12th ed.].
40. Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.006 ↗
41. Al-Rabiaah, S. (2018). The “Stuxnet” Virus of 2010 As an Example of A “APT” and Its “Recent” Variances. Proceedings of the 2018 21st Saudi Computer Society National Computer Conference (NCC), IEEE.10.1109/NCG.2018.8593143 ↗
42. Vostoupal, J. (2024). Stuxnet vs. WannaCry and Albania: Cyber-attribution on trial. Comput. Law Secur. Rev., 54.10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106008 ↗
43. Cherepanov, A. (2017). A New Threat for Industrial Control Systems, ESET. Technical Report.
44. Wildemuth, B.M. (2017). Qualitative Analysis of Content. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, Libraries Unlimited. [2nd ed.].
45. Hopf, C. (2004). Qualitative Interviews: An Overview. A Companion to Qualitative Research, SAGA Publications.
46. Cabe, M.M. (2025). Enhancing MITRE ATT&CK® Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems Using Insights from Advanced Persistent Threats. [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology].
47. Alexander, O., Belisle, M., and Steele, J. (2020). MITRE ATT&CK® for Industrial Control Systems: Design and Philosophy, MITRE. Technical Report.
48. Industrial and Critical Infrastructure Security: Technical Analysis of Real-Life Security Incidents10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3133348 ↗
49. Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Department of Energy (DOE) (2022). Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures of Indicted State-Sponsored Russian Cyber Actors Targeting the Energy Sector, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Technical Report AA22-083A.
50. Firoozjaei, M.D., Mahmoudyar, N., Baseri, Y., and Ghorbani, A.A. (2022). An evaluation framework for industrial control system cyber incidents. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., 36.10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100487 ↗
51. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (2025, March 16). Ongoing Sophisticated Malware Campaign Compromising ICS (Update E), Available online: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ics-alert-14-281-01e.
52. Dragos Inc (2017). Crashoverride, Dragos. Technical Report 2.20170613.
53. (2003). Telecontrol Equipment and Systems—Part 5-101: Telecontrol Equipment and Systems—Part 5-101: Transmissionprotocols—Companion Standard for Basic Telecontrol Tasks (Standard No. IEC 60870-5-101).
54. (2006). Telecontrol Equipment and Systems—Part 5-104: Transmission Protocols—Network Access for IEC 60870-5-101 Using Standard Transport Profiles (Standard No. IEC 60870-5-104).
55. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) (2024, September 24). CrashOverride Malware, Available online: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2017/06/12/crashoverride-malware.
56. Proska, K., Wolfram, J., Wilson, J., Black, D., Lunden, K., Zafra, D.K., Brubaker, N., McLellan, T., and Sistrunk, C. (2025, March 17). Sandworm Disrupts Power in Ukraine Using a Novel Attack Against Operational Technology. Available online: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/sandworm-disrupts-power-ukraine-operational-technology.
57. Dragos Inc. (2025, March 24). ELECTRUM Targeted Ukrainian Electric Entity Using Custom Tools and CaddyWiper Malware. Available online: https://www.dragos.com/blog/new-details-electrum-ukraine-electric-sector-compromise-2022/.
58. (2023). Industrial Communication Networks—Network and System Security (Standard No. IEC 62443 Series).
59. Hahn, A., Cyprus, J., Keppler, D., Collins, M., Harvey, C., Pearson, N.L.T., Ford, W., Cui, A., and Locasto, M. (2025, May 10). The EMB3D™ Threat Model for Embedded Devices. Available online: https://emb3d.mitre.org/assets/EMB3D_Paper_09-23-24.pdf.
60. Kayan, H., Nunes, M., Rana, O., Burnap, P., and Perera, C. (2022). Cybersecurity of Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems: A Review In ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 11s, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3510410 ↗
61. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., and Wesslén, A. (2024). Experimentation in Software Engineering, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-662-69306-3 ↗
62. (2024, September 24). Cyber-Attack Against Ukrainian Critical Infrastructure, Available online: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ir-alert-h-16-056-01.
63. (2025, March 06). Loss of Safety, Technique T0880. Available online: https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T0880/.
64. Busby, J.W., Baker, K., Bazilian, M.D., Gilbert, A.Q., Grubert, E., Rai, V., Rhodes, J.D., Shidore, S., Smith, C.A., and Webber, M.E. (2021). Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 77.10.1016/j.erss.2021.102106 ↗
65. Hedgecoe, G., and Lamche, A. (2025). At Least Three Deaths Linked to Massive Spain Power Cut, British Broadcasting Corporation.
66. Blackburn, G. (2025). ‘It Won’t Happen Again,’ Spain’s Grid Operator Says in Iberian Blackout Aftermath, Euronew.
67. Hasan, S., Chhokra, A., Dubey, A., Mahadevan, N., Karsai, G., Jain, R., and Lukic, S. (2017). A simulation testbed for cascade analysis. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), IEEE.10.1109/ISGT.2017.8086080 ↗
68. (2025, May 30). Lockout/Tagout, Available online: https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHAFS3529.pdf.
69. Salazar, L., López-Morales, E., Lozano, J., Rubio-Medrano, C., and Cárdenas, A.A. (2024). ICSNet: A Hybrid-Interaction Honeynet for Industrial Control Systems. CPSIoTSec’24: Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on CPS&IoT Security and Privacy, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3690134.3694813 ↗
70. Team82 (2024). Unpacking the Blackjack Group’s Fuxnet Malware, Claroty. Technical Report.