Local calibration and Implementation of AASHTOWARE Pavement ME performance models for Oklahoma pavement systems
Source abstract
Abstract
AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design software was developed as an advanced pavement design tool based on the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Existing performance prediction models utilised in this design guide are nationally calibrated, and it is essential to calibrate these models based on the specific local materials and environmental conditions, and pavement performance information. In this study, Pavement ME Design prediction models, including IRI, rutting, top-down and bottom-up fatigue cracking, and transverse cracking models were calibrated for the state of Oklahoma. The predictions from distress and international roughness index models were evaluated and compared with the measured distress values, and the accuracy and bias terms of each model were determined. Nationally calibrated models showed large errors and significant bias values, which asserts the need for local calibration. Locally calibrated coefficients of distresses and international roughness index models for the Oklahoma pavement system were determined. Predictions from calibrated models show that the use of calibrated coefficients improves Pavement ME predictions and the design of flexible pavements in the state. The impact of the local calibration of Pavement ME on flexible pavement designs was analysed. Locally calibrated models lead to lower IRI prediction and higher fatigue cracking and rutting in the designs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Funding
Oklahoma Department of Transportation
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO, 2010. Guide for the local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. AASHTO, 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. ARA Inc. ERES Consultants Division 2004. “Guide for Mechanistic–Empirical Design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” In NCHRP Project. Washington DC.
4. Ceylan Halil et al. 2015. “Investigation of AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design/Darwin-ME™ performance prediction models for Iowa pavement analysis and design.” In. Iowa Department of Transportation Ames IA.
5. Cross Stephen A Gibbe Robel and Aryal Nirajan 2011. “Development of a flexible pavement database for local calibration of the MEPDG Part 2 evaluation of ODOT SMA mixtures.” In. Oklahoma Department of Transportation Oklahoma City OK.
6. Cross Stephen A Jakatimath Yatish and Sumesh KC. 2007. “Determination of dynamic modulus master curves for Oklahoma HMA mixtures.” In. Oklahoma Department of Transportation Oklahoma City OK.
7. Darter Michael I et al. 2014. “Calibration and implementation of the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in Arizona.” In. Arizona Department of Transportation.
8. 10.3141/2226-1510.3141/2226-15 ↗
9. Hossain Zahid et al. 2011. “Development of flexible pavement database for local calibration of MEPDG.” In. Oklahoma Department of Transportation Oklahoma City OK.
10. Kim Y Richard et al. 2011. “Local calibration of the MEPDG for flexible pavement design.” In. North Carolina State University. Dept. of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering.
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000070010.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000700 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0332574910.1007/BF03325749 ↗
13. 10.3141/2095-0810.3141/2095-08 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2015.12.00110.1016/j.ijprt.2015.12.001 ↗
15. Mallela Jagannath et al. 2013. “Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Colorado.” In. Colorado. Dept. of Transportation. Research Branch Denver CO: Colorado. Dept. of Transportation. Research Branch.
16. 10.1080/10298436.2016.119987810.1080/10298436.2016.1199878 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000207010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002070 ↗
18. Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2019. Materials. In: Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, 613–788. Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, Pavement Management Branch..
19. OWRB. 2018. “The Oklahoma Water Resource Board.” https://www.owrb.ok.gov/.
20. Robbins, Mary M, et al., 2017. Pavement ME design–A summary of local calibration efforts for flexible pavements. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology, 1–98.
21. Sakhaeifar Maryam S. et al. 2015. “Selection of long lasting rehabilitation treatment using life cycle cost analysis and present serviceability rating.” In ODOT SP&R Item Number 2261. Oklahoma Department of Transportation Materials and Research Division Oklahoma City OK.
22. Sakhaeifar Maryam S et al. 2019. “Compilation of local studies and regional calibration of pavement me design for rigid and flexible pavements in Oklahoma.” In. Oklahoma: Oklahoma Department of Transportation.
23. Schwartz Charles W et al. 2011. “Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction.” In. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
24. Wang Kelvin CP et al. 2014. Pavement ME Design distress modeling for Oklahoma. Paper presented at the T&DI Congress: Planes Trains and Automobiles Orlando Florida.10.1061/9780784413586.018 ↗
25. Williams R Chris and Shaidur R 2013. “Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide calibration for pavement rehabilitation.” In.: Oregon. Dept. of Transportation. Research Section Salem Ore. and Federal Highway Administration Washington D.C.
26. Witczak MW Zapata CE and Houston WN 2006. “Models incorporated into the current enhanced integrated climatic model: NCHRP 9-23 project findings and additional changes after version 0.7.” In. Project NCHRP.
27. WSS. 2018. “USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).” https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.