Comparative Analysis of Large-Scale Testing and Three-Dimensional Rockfall Modeling in Assessment of Tabulated Coefficients of Restitution
Source abstract
Abstract
Rockfall hazard assessment and mitigation design relies heavily on three-dimensional trajectory modeling, in which the coefficient of restitution (COR) is a governing parameter controlling rebound, energy dissipation, and runout distance. In practice, COR values are commonly selected from generalized tables based on slope material type, introducing significant epistemic uncertainty and limiting predictive accuracy. This study presents a comparative evaluation of large-scale field rockfall experiments and 3-D numerical simulations conducted at a former aggregate quarry in Boise, Idaho, to assess the performance of tabulated restitution coefficients. Concrete blocks of controlled shape (spheres, cubes, and rectangular prisms) and mass (17–68 kg) were instrumented with inertial sensors and released from two slope configurations. High-resolution UAV-based LiDAR was used to reconstruct slope geometry, while dynamic cone penetrometer and friction tests were performed to characterize spatial variability in slope material stiffness. These data were incorporated into RocFall3 to simulate block trajectories using spatially varying COR values. Initial models assuming zero rotational velocity and tabulated COR ranges failed to reproduce observed runout distances, dispersion patterns, and modes of motion, particularly for non-spherical blocks. Incorporating field-measured initial rotational velocities significantly improved agreement between modeled and observed trajectories, by correcting the unrealistic sliding mode of motion previously observed. However, quantitative discrepancies in deposition and dispersion persisted, highlighting limitations associated with simplified slope geometry and the loss of small-scale surface features during LiDAR surface reconstruction. The results demonstrate that restitution behavior is strongly shape-dependent and that realistic initial conditions are essential for physically meaningful simulations. The findings underscore the need for site-specific, material-informed approaches to COR estimation and for improved integration of high-fidelity field data into physics-based rockfall models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
Funding
United States National Science Foundation
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Arsenith, L., Goertzen, G., and Hudyma, N. (2025). Tortuosity—A Novel Approach to Quantifying Variability of Rockfall Paths. Geotechnics, 5.10.3390/geotechnics5020036 ↗
2. Probabilistic modeling of rockfall trajectories: A review10.1007/s10064-015-0718-9 ↗
3. On the role of sphericity of falling rock clusters—Insights from experimental and numerical investigations10.1007/s10346-017-0874-z ↗
4. Reconstruction of four-dimensional rockfall trajectories using remote sensing and rock-based accelerometers and gyroscopes10.5194/esurf-7-199-2019 ↗
5. Slope geometry design as a means for controlling rockfalls in quarries10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.02.001 ↗
6. Caviezel, A., Sanchez, M.A., Lu, G., Christen, M., Bartelt, P., Wendeler, C., and Lanter, A. (2020, January 14–19). Full Scale Testing of Rockfall Nets under Realistic Conditions. Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium—EUROCK, Online.
7. Maheshwari, S., Bhowmik, R., and Samanta, M. (2023). Rockfall hazard: A comprehensive review of current mitigation practices. Landslides: Detection, Prediction and Monitoring: Technological Developments, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-23859-8_9 ↗
8. Toward objective rockfall trajectory simulation using a stochastic impact model10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.017 ↗
9. Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00016-3 ↗
10. Effects of the impact angle on the coefficient of restitution in rockfall analysis based on a medium-scale laboratory test10.5194/nhess-18-3045-2018 ↗
11. Effect of Impact Angle and Rotational Motion of Spherical Blocks on the Coefficients of Restitution for Rockfalls10.1007/s10706-018-00774-0 ↗
12. Experimental study on the coefficient of restitution for the rotational sphere rockfall10.1007/s12665-021-09684-6 ↗
13. Laboratory investigation of the effect of the rotational speed on the coefficient of restitution10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106196 ↗
14. A coefficient of restitution of rock materials10.1016/j.cageo.2007.04.004 ↗
15. In situ rockfall testing in New South Wales, Australia10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.013 ↗
16. Why can rockfall normal restitution coefficient be higher than one?
17. Laboratory Investigation on High Values of Restitution Coefficients10.1007/s00603-011-0183-0 ↗
18. Geotechnical and kinematic parameters affecting the coefficients of restitution for rock fall analysis10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.05.029 ↗
19. Giokari, S., Asteriou, P., Saroglou, C., and Tsiambaos, G. (2015). Rockfalls: Effect of slope surface weathering on the coefficients of restitution. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory—Volume 2: Landslide Processes, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_363 ↗
20. Coefficient of restitution and kinetic energy loss of rockfall impacts10.1007/s12205-015-0221-7 ↗
21. Laboratory study on the influencing factors and their control for the coefficient of restitution during rockfall impacts10.1007/s10346-019-01183-x ↗
22. Ji, Z.-M., Wang, T.-H., Wu, F.-Q., Wang, D.-P., and Li, Z.-H. (2023). Occurrence conditions of the reverse rotation of rockfall and its influence on the restitution coefficient. Front. Earth Sci., 11.10.3389/feart.2023.1257187 ↗
23. Brief Communication: Measuring rock decelerations and rotation changes during short-duration ground impacts10.5194/nhess-18-3145-2018 ↗
24. Dynamic analysis of multi-block rockfalls using improved 3-D discontinuous deformation analysis: Effect of coefficient of restitution10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107910 ↗
25. Real-size experiments and 3-D simulation of rockfall on forested and non-forested slopes10.5194/nhess-6-145-2006 ↗
26. Asteriou, P., Saroglou, H., and Tsiambaos, G. (2013, January 23–26). Rockfall: Scaling factors for the coefficient of restitution. Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium—EUROCK 2013, Wroclaw, Poland.10.1201/b15683-31 ↗
27. Analysis of Rockfall Hazards Based on the Effect of Rock Size and Shape10.1007/s40999-019-00418-1 ↗
28. Rockfall susceptibility zoning based on back analysis of rockfall deposit inventory in Gunung Kelir, Java10.1007/s10346-016-0713-7 ↗
29. An improved calculation model for predicting the coefficient of restitution and maximum impact force of rockfalls10.1007/s12517-020-06020-3 ↗
30. Sabatakakis, N., Depountis, N., and Vagenas, N. (2015). Evaluation of rockfall restitution coefficients. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory—Volume 2: Landslide Processes, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_359 ↗