Nonlinear Simulation of Terminal Maneuvers Including Landing Gear Dynamics, Crosswind and Ground Effect
Source abstract
Abstract
Terminal flight phases, particularly landing, are among the most critical, due to low altitude, low speed and the possible presence of crosswinds. Tools capable of accurately modeling and simulating these phases are essential for identifying potential issues and assessing airplane safety integrity. This work focuses on the development of a nonlinear flight simulator devised to handle terminal maneuvers, including ground effect and wind. Such a simulator incorporates the six-degree-of-freedom rigid body equations of motion coupled with a landing gear model and with a basic control that emulates the action of the pilot, while the aircraft aerodynamic characteristics are estimated through a dedicated semi-empirical procedure. The proposed simulator is employed to assess the effect of crosswind and approach speed on different performance indicators, considering a general aviation airplane (Ryan Navion). These indicators include ground roll distance, wing-tip clearance and lateral forces exerted on the landing gear. The results demonstrate that landings are achievable even beyond the demonstrated crosswind limits without encountering wing-tip strikes or rollover and that higher approach speeds could be advisable in strong crosswind conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Aerospace and Aviation Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milan, Italy
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Airbus (2021). A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents, 1958–2021, Airbus. Technical Report.
2. Boeing Commercial Airplanes (2015). Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents: World Wide Operations 1959–2015, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Aviation Safety. Technical Report.
3. Flight Safety Foundation (2000). Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) Briefing Note: 8.7—Crosswind Landing, Flight Safety Foundation.
4. Cui, E., and Zhang, X. (2010). Ground Effect Aerodynamics. Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470686652.eae022 ↗
5. Dreier, M.E. (2007). Introduction to Helicopter and Tiltrotor Simulation, AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics).10.2514/4.862083 ↗
6. Evans, P.E. (2010). Modeling and Simulation of Tricycle Landing Gear at Normal and Abnormal Conditions. [Master’s Thesis, West Virginia University]. Available online: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/2153/.
7. Wang, C., and Holzapfel, F. (2018, January 8–12). Modeling of the Aircraft Landing Behavior for Runway Excursion and Abnormal Runway Contact Analysis. Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Kissimmee, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2018-1166 ↗
8. Daniels, J.N. (1996). A Method for Landing Gear Modeling and Simulation with Experimental Validation, NASA Langley Research Center. Technical Report; NASA Contractor Report 201601.
9. A Review of Civil Aircraft Arresting System for Runway Overruns10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.07.006 ↗
10. Barnes, A., and Yager, T. (1998). Enhancement of Ground Handling Simulation Capability, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Developement.
11. How Future Aircraft Can Benefit from a Steerable Main Landing Gear for Crosswind Operations10.1007/s13272-019-00410-4 ↗
12. On the Use of a Steerable Main Landing Gear for Crosswind Landing Assistance10.1007/s13272-014-0107-2 ↗
13. Object-oriented landing gear model in a PC-based flight simulator10.1016/j.simpat.2008.08.009 ↗
14. Dynamics Model of Carrier-based Aircraft Landing Gears Landed on Dynamic Deck10.1016/S1000-9361(08)60113-2 ↗
15. Cacciola, S., Riboldi, C.E.D., and Generali, E. (2023). Optimization of Airplane Landing in Crosswind Conditions for Minimum Tire Wear. Machines, 11.10.20944/preprints202304.1048.v1 ↗
16. Fink, R. (1978). USAF Stability and Control DATCOM, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company. Technical Report AFWAL-TR-83-3048.
17. Cacciola, S., Testa, L., and Saponi, M. (2025). A Procedure for Developing a Flight Mechanics Model of a Three-Surface Drone Using Semi-Empirical Methods. Aerospace, 12.10.3390/aerospace12060515 ↗
18. Suit, W.T. (1972). Aerodynamic Parameters of the Navion Airplane Extracted from Flight Data, NASA Langley Research Center. NASA Technica Note.
19. Company, R.A. (1949). Navion Service Manual, Ryan Aeronautical Company. Technical Report.
20. Roskam, J. (1997). Airplane Design; Number pt. I–VIII in Airplane Design, DARcorporation.
21. Raymer, D.P. (2018). Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.10.2514/4.104909 ↗
22. Williams, J.E., and Vukelich, S.R. (1979). The USAF Stability and Control Datcom Users Manual, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company. Updated in 1999.
23. Impact of ground effect on airplane lateral directional stability during take-off and landing10.4236/ojfd.2018.81001 ↗
24. O’Leary, C.O. (1969). Flight Measurements of Ground Effect on the Lift and Pitching Moment of a Large Transport Aircraft (Comet 3B) and Comparison with Wind Tunnel and Other Data, Aerodynamics Department, R.A.E. Bedford.
25. Chaney, V., Vaux, S., Bolds-Moorehead, P., and Lutz, T. Joint Airbus and Boeing Flight Test Lecture. Royal Aeronautical Society, Flight Test Group, 2013. Historic Joint Lecture by Airbus and Boeing Test Pilots and Flight Test Engineers. Royal Aeronautical Society Headquarters, London, 14 March 2013. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVt6LiDbLos.
26. AOPA (2026, February 01). Seeing Is Believing. Yes, This Is a 1947 Navion. Available online: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2016/june/pilot/1947-navion.
27. Roskam, J. (1987). Airplane Design. Pt 6, Design Analysis and Research Corporation.
28. Cacciola, S., and Calabria, A. (2026). Figures and data: Nonlinear Simulation of Terminal Maneuvers including Landing Gear Dynamics, Crosswind and Ground Effect. Applied Sciences, Zenodo. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/18508079.10.3390/app16041686 ↗
29. MATLAB (2024). MATLAB R2024b Release Docmentation, The MathWorks Inc.
30. Biannic, J.M., and Roos, C. (2018). Robust Autoland Design by Multi-Model H∞ Synthesis with a Focus on the Flare Phase, Systems & Information Processing Department, The French Aerospace Lab (ONERA).10.3390/aerospace5010018 ↗