No-Reference Quality Assessment of Dermoscopic Images Using Minimal Expert Supervision
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: Assessing image quality is critical in medical imaging to ensure diagnostic reliability. Traditional no-reference image quality assessment (IQA) metrics designed for natural images often fail to address the complexities of medical images. This study proposes DermaIQA, a novel no-reference metric for dermoscopic images that aligns quality scores with clinical perception. Methods: We developed a degradation pipeline simulating realistic artifacts without requiring extensive manual labeling. From 812 expert-classified images, we generated a comprehensive dataset (>125,000 images) using controlled blur and compression techniques. An iterative ranking procedure converted these degradations into a continuous quality scale, which was used to train a vision transformer model. Results: The proposed IQA metric outperformed both heuristic and deep learning techniques, achieving 92% accuracy in distinguishing high-quality vs. low-quality images. The approach demonstrated robust generalization when tested on external datasets with different acquisition characteristics, confirming its relevance across varied imaging conditions. Conclusions: DermaIQA represents the first dermatology-specific quality metric that minimizes expert annotation requirements while maintaining clinical relevance. This tool enhances workflows through real-time acquisition feedback and acts as a gatekeeper for AI diagnostic systems, ensuring only high-quality images are processed. The trained model and inference scripts are publicly available.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management · Digital Imaging in Medicine · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Biolab, PoliToBIOMed Lab, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
SCDU Dermatologia, AOU Maggiore della Carità, C.so Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy
Department of Health Science, University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Dermoscopy Image Analysis: Overview and Future Directions10.1109/JBHI.2019.2895803 ↗
2. Dermatologist-Level Classification of Skin Cancer with Deep Neural Networks10.1038/nature21056 ↗
3. Skin Lesion Classification Using CNNs with Patch-Based Attention and Diagnosis-Guided Loss Weighting10.1109/TBME.2019.2915839 ↗
4. Omnidirectional Image Quality Assessment with Local–Global Vision Transformers10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105151 ↗
5. All You Need Is Data Preparation: A Systematic Review of Image Harmonization Techniques in Multi-Center/Device Studies for Medical Support Systems10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108200 ↗
6. A Study on the Adequacy of Common IQA Measures for Medical Images
7. A Study of Why We Need to Reassess Full Reference Image Quality Assessment with Medical Images10.1007/s10278-025-01462-1 ↗
8. Yu, S., Dai, G., Wang, Z., Li, L., Wei, X., and Xie, Y. (2018). A Consistency Evaluation of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in the Quality Assessment of Human Brain Magnetic Resonance Images. BMC Med. Imaging, 18.10.1186/s12880-018-0256-6 ↗
9. Perceptual Image Quality Assessment Based on Structural Similarity and Visual Masking10.1016/j.image.2012.04.005 ↗
10. AM-BQA: Enhancing Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Attention Retractable Features and Multi-Dimensional Learning10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105076 ↗
11. Review of Medical Image Quality Assessment10.1016/j.bspc.2016.02.006 ↗
12. Hosny, K.M., Kassem, M.A., and Foaud, M.M. (2018). Skin Cancer Classification Using Deep Learning and Transfer Learning. Proceedings of the 2018 9th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference (CIBEC), Cairo, Egypt, 20–22 December 2018, IEEE.10.1109/CIBEC.2018.8641762 ↗
13. Veronese, F., Tarantino, V., Zavattaro, E., Biacchi, F., Airoldi, C., Salvi, M., Seoni, S., Branciforti, F., Meiburger, K.M., and Savoia, P. (2022). Teledermoscopy in the Diagnosis of Melanocytic and Non-Melanocytic Skin Lesions: NurugoTM Derma Smartphone Microscope as a Possible New Tool in Daily Clinical Practice. Diagnostics, 12.10.20944/preprints202205.0356.v1 ↗
14. Yang, S., Wu, T., Shi, S., Lao, S., Gong, Y., Cao, M., Wang, J., and Yang, Y. (2026, February 03). MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment, Github Repository. Available online: https://github.com/IIGROUP/MANIQA.
15. Ke, J., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Milanfar, P., and Yang, F. (2021). Musiq: Multi-Scale Image Quality Transformer. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada, 10–17 October 2021, IEEE.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00510 ↗
16. Su, S., Yan, Q., Zhu, Y., Zhang, C., Ge, X., Sun, J., and Zhang, Y. (2020). Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Wild Guided by a Self-Adaptive Hyper Network. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3–8 January 2022, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00372 ↗
17. Golestaneh, S.A., Dadsetan, S., and Kitani, K.M. (2022). No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3–8 January 2022, IEEE.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00404 ↗
18. Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer10.1109/LSP.2012.2227726 ↗
19. A Feature-Enriched Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluator10.1109/TIP.2015.2426416 ↗
20. Objective Quality Assessment of Medical Images and Videos: Review and Challenges10.1007/s11042-024-20292-x ↗
21. Chen, B., Solebo, A.L., Bao, W., and Taylor, P. (2025). Medical Image Quality Assessment Based on Probability of Necessity and Sufficiency. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Houston, TX, USA, 14–17 April 2025, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI60581.2025.10981239 ↗
22. Chen, J., Lin, L., Cheng, P., Huang, Y., and Tang, X. (2023). Uno-Qa: An Unsupervised Anomaly-Aware Framework with Test-Time Clustering for Octa Image Quality Assessment. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Cartagena, Colombia, 18–21 April 2023, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI53787.2023.10230810 ↗
23. Petashvili, D., Wang, H., Deslandes, A., Avery, J., Condous, G., Carneiro, G., Hull, L., and Chen, H.-T. (2024). Learning Subjective Image Quality Assessment for Transvaginal Ultrasound Scans from Multi-Annotator Labels. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Athens, Greece, 27–30 May 2024, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI56570.2024.10635761 ↗
24. Maruyama, S., Watanabe, H., and Shimosegawa, M. (2024). An Image Quality Assessment Index Based on Image Features and Keypoints for X-Ray CT Images. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0304860 ↗
25. Ozer, C., Guler, A., Cansever, A.T., and Oksuz, I. (2023). Explainable Image Quality Assessment for Medical Imaging. arXiv.
26. Nikiforaki, K., Karatzanis, I., Dovrou, A., Bobowicz, M., Gwozdziewicz, K., Díaz, O., Tsiknakis, M., Fotiadis, D.I., Lekadir, K., and Marias, K. (2024). Image Quality Assessment Tool for Conventional and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisitions. J. Imaging, 10.10.3390/jimaging10050115 ↗
27. Elo, A.E. (1986). The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present, Arco Publishing Company, Inc.. [2nd ed.].
28. The HAM10000 Dataset, a Large Collection of Multi-Source Dermatoscopic Images of Common Pigmented Skin Lesions10.1038/sdata.2018.161 ↗
29. Codella, N.C.F., Gutman, D., Celebi, M.E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M.A., Dusza, S.W., Kalloo, A., Liopyris, K., Mishra, N., and Kittler, H. (2018). Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC). Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), Washington, DC, USA, 4–7 April 2018, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363547 ↗
30. Mendonca, T., Ferreira, P.M., Marques, J.S., Marcal, A.R.S., and Rozeira, J. (2013). PH2—A Dermoscopic Image Database for Research and Benchmarking. Proceedings of the 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Osaka, Japan, 3–7 July 2013, IEEE.10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610779 ↗
31. Deep Learning-Based Skin Diseases Classification Using Smartphones10.1002/aisy.202300211 ↗
32. Buslaev, A., Iglovikov, V.I., Khvedchenya, E., Parinov, A., Druzhinin, M., and Kalinin, A.A. (2020). Albumentations: Fast and Flexible Image Augmentations. Information, 11.10.3390/info11020125 ↗
33. Levin, A., Weiss, Y., Durand, F., and Freeman, W.T. (2009). Understanding and Evaluating Blind Deconvolution Algorithms. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA, 20–25 June 2009, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206815 ↗
34. The JPEG Image Compression Algorithm
35. Discrete Cosine Transform10.1109/T-C.1974.223784 ↗
36. Tomar, R.R.S., and Jain, K. (2015). Lossless Image Compression Using Differential Pulse Code Modulation and Its Application. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), Jabalpur, India, 12–14 December 2015, IEEE.10.1109/CICN.2015.84 ↗
37. Huffman Coding10.1145/3342555 ↗
38. Weiyuan, W., Verma, D., and Yang, W. (2026, February 03). Patchify Github Repository. GitHub Repository. Available online: https://github.com/dovahcrow/patchify.py.
39. Scope of Validity of PSNR in Image/Video Quality Assessment10.1049/el:20080522 ↗
40. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer Using Shifted Windows. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada, 10–17 October 2021, IEEE.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
41. Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild10.1109/TIP.2021.3061932 ↗
42. Chen, C., and Jiadi, M. (2026, February 03). IQA-PyTorch: PyTorch Toolbox for Image Quality Assessment, GitHub Repository. Available online: https://github.com/chaofengc/IQA-PyTorch.
43. Focusing10.1007/BF00127822 ↗
44. Diatom Autofocusing in Brightfield Microscopy: A Comparative Study
45. No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on Spatial and Spectral Entropies10.1016/j.image.2014.06.006 ↗
46. Al-refai, G., Qadan, S., Al-refai, M., and Elmoaqet, H. (2024). Introducing Edges Density and Texture Contrast Scores as Quality Metrics for Enhanced Low Light Images. Proceedings of the 2024 22nd International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics (REM), Amman, Jordan, 24–26 September 2024, IEEE.10.1109/REM63063.2024.10735629 ↗
47. Generative Models for Color Normalization in Digital Pathology and Dermatology: Advancing the Learning Paradigm10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123105 ↗
48. DermoCC-GAN: A New Approach for Standardizing Dermatological Images Using Generative Adversarial Networks10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107040 ↗
49. Automatic Skin Lesion Segmentation Using Deep Fully Convolutional Networks With Jaccard Distance10.1109/TMI.2017.2695227 ↗