journal article·2026-02-08Open access

Adhesion, Biofilm Formation and Plaque-Related Potential of Streptococcus mutans on Orthodontic Materials: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Lucia Giannini, Niccolò Cenzato, Massimo Del Fabbro, Cinzia Maspero

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic appliances introduce new surfaces into the oral cavity that can modulate biofilm formation and potentially increase the risk of white spot lesions. Material-dependent differences in surface roughness, wettability and geometry may influence early colonization by Streptococcus mutans, a key cariogenic pathogen. Objectives: To compare early adhesion and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans on five commonly used orthodontic materials: stainless-steel (SS) and nickel–titanium (NiTi) archwires, metallic and ceramic brackets, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) acrylic resin. Materials and Methods: Standardized specimens were prepared, polished when applicable, sterilized, and conditioned in artificial saliva. The tested materials included SS and NiTi archwires (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), metallic and ceramic brackets (Ormco, Orange, CA, USA), and PMMA acrylic resin (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Early adhesion (CFU), biofilm biomass (crystal violet), and metabolic activity (XTT) were quantified after incubation with S. mutans. Surface roughness (Ra) and contact angle were measured, and correlations with microbiological endpoints were assessed. Results: A clear material-dependent gradient was observed. Stainless steel showed the lowest early adhesion and biofilm formation (5.20 ± 0.28 log10 CFU·cm−2; CV OD590 = 0.60 ± 0.14), followed by NiTi, metallic brackets, and ceramic brackets, while PMMA exhibited the highest bacterial load and biofilm biomass (6.09 ± 0.32 log10 CFU·cm−2; CV OD590 = 1.10 ± 0.17). Overall differences between materials were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Surface roughness and contact angle positively correlated with bacterial colonization. Conclusions: Early S. mutans colonization is strongly influenced by orthodontic material properties, with smoother and less hydrophobic surfaces showing reduced biofilm formation. PMMA and bracket structures may pose higher cariogenic risk during treatment. These findings support the development of surface-engineered or biofilm-resilient orthodontic materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Oral microbiology and periodontitis research · Dental materials and restorations · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy

Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy

Funding

italian ministry of health

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Global Map of Skeletal and Dental Malocclusion Prevalence: From Classes to Continents10.26420/jdentoraldisord.2024.1183 ↗
2. Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients10.4317/jced.57593 ↗
3. Impact of Clear Aligners on Oral Health and Oral Microbiome During Orthodontic Treatment10.1016/j.identj.2023.03.012 ↗
4. Orthodontic tooth movement: The biology and clinical implications10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.007 ↗
5. Cenzato, N., Occhipinti, C., D’amici, E., Savadori, P., Baldini, B., and Maspero, C. (2024). Microbiological Analysis of Plaque and Its Composition in Three Patient Groups under Different Orthodontic Treatments. Dent. J., 12.10.3390/dj12060168 ↗
6. Oral diseases: A global public health challenge10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8 ↗
7. Biagi, R., Dipalma, G., Macrì, F., Cenzato, N., Maspero, C., and Giannini, L. (2025). Mutagenicity Evaluation of Orthodontic Resins Using the Ames Test. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app151910351 ↗
8. The complication of oral piercing and the role of dentist in their prevention: A literature review
9. Surface characteristics of ceramic and metallic brackets: A systematic review
10. Orthodontic appliances and their impact on oral microbiota
11. Marsh, P.D. (2006). Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community—Implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health, 6.10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14 ↗
12. The oral microbiome: An update for oral healthcare professionals
13. The oral microbiome—An update for the clinician10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.865 ↗
14. Periodontitis: From microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation10.1038/nri3785 ↗
15. Functional signatures of oral dysbiosis during periodontitis progression revealed by microbial metatranscriptome analysis10.1186/s13073-015-0153-3 ↗
16. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing identifies microbiota associated with oral cancer
17. Falsetta, M.L., Klein, M.I., Colonne, P.M., Scott-Anne, K., Gregoire, S., Pai, C.H., Gonzalez-Begne, M., Watson, G., Yates, J.R., and Dewhirst, F. (2014). Symbiotic relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans synergizes biofilm development and enhances virulence in vivo. PLoS Pathog., 10.10.1128/IAI.00087-14 ↗
18. Genome-wide analysis of dental caries and periodontitis combining clinical and self-reported data10.1038/s41467-019-10630-1 ↗
19. Tektas, S., Thurnheer, T., Eliades, T., Attin, T., and Karygianni, L. (2020). Initial Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Aligner Materials. Antibiotics, 9.10.3390/antibiotics9120908 ↗
20. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley.
21. SALIVA-based diagnostic approach for diabetes mellitus: A step towards non-invasive detection—A scoping review
22. Comparative short-term in vitro analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion on esthetic, nickel-titanium, and stainless-steel arch wires10.2319/061713-456.1 ↗
23. Condò, R., Mampieri, G., Pasquantonio, G., Giancotti, A., Pirelli, P., Cataldi, M.E., La Rocca, S., Leggeri, A., Notargiacomo, A., and Maiolo, L. (2021). In Vitro Evaluation of Structural Factors Favouring Bacterial Adhesion on Orthodontic Adhesive Resins. Materials, 14.10.20944/preprints202103.0322.v1 ↗
24. Kozmos, M., Virant, P., Rojko, F., Abram, A., Rudolf, R., Raspor, P., Zore, A., and Bohinc, K. (2021). Bacterial Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to Dental Material Surfaces. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26041152 ↗
25. Analysis of surface roughness and surface free energy characteristics of various orthodontic materials10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.032 ↗
26. Head, D.A., Marsh, P.D., and Devine, D.A. (2014). Non-lethal control of the cariogenic potential of an agent-based model for dental plaque. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0105012 ↗
27. Temporal dynamics of adhesion of oral bacteria to orthodontic appliances10.4012/dmj.2022-235 ↗
28. The dynamics of the oral microbiome and oral health among patients receiving clear aligner orthodontic treatment10.1111/odi.13175 ↗
29. Giannini, L., Galbiati, G., Tartaglia, F.C., Grecolini, M.E., Maspero, C., and Biagi, R. (2025). Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances Versus Aligners: An Experimental Study of Periodontal Aspects. Dent. J., 13.10.3390/dj13020070 ↗
30. Salivary levels of cariogenic bacterial species during orthodontic treatment with thermoplastic aligners or fixed appliances: A prospective cohort study10.1186/s40510-018-0230-4 ↗
31. Salivary concentrations of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli during an orthodontic treatment10.1002/cre2.261 ↗
32. Titanium TSME appliance for patients allergic to nickel
33. Titanium orthodontic appliances for allergic patients
34. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances10.1067/mod.2001.110167 ↗
35. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures
36. Magical NiTi expander10.1136/bcr-2013-009140 ↗
37. Slow maxillary expansion in adult patient with Hyrax expander: A case report10.4317/jced.62001 ↗
38. In vivo aging of orthodontic alloys: Implications for corrosion potential, nickel release, and biocompatibility
39. Nickel Hypersensitivity and Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
40. Nickel Allergy in Adolescents in Relation to Orthodontic Treatment and Piercing of Ears10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70175-0 ↗
41. Nickel Allergy and Orthodontic Treatment10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.01014.x ↗
42. Prevalence of Nickel Hypersensitivity in Orthodontic Patients: A Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.013 ↗
43. Nickel and Cobalt Hypersensitivity Reaction before and after Orthodontic Therapy in Children10.5005/jcdp-5-4-79 ↗
44. Nickel Allergy and Orthodontics: A Review and Report of Two Cases10.1038/bdj.2008.198 ↗
45. Skin Irritation in Children Undergoing Orthodontic Facemask Therapy10.1038/s41598-023-29253-0 ↗
46. Application of CAD-CAM for Fabrication of Metal-Free Band and Loop Space Maintainer
47. Szuhanek, C.A., Watz, C.G., Avram, Ș., Moacă, E.A., Mihali, C.V., Popa, A., Campan, A.A., Nicolov, M., and Dehelean, C.A. (2020). Comparative Toxicological In Vitro and In Ovo Screening of Different Orthodontic Implants Currently Used in Dentistry. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13245690 ↗