journal article·2022-12-06Open access

Reliability assessment of compressive and splitting tensile strength prediction of roller compacted concrete pavement: introducing MARS-GOA-MCS

Guodao Zhang, Naser Safaeian Hamzehkolaei, Hamed Rashnoozadeh, Shahab S. Band, Amir Mosavi

Abstract

It is required to determine the mechanical properties of Roller Compacted Concrete Pavement (RCCP) such as Compressive Strength (CS) and Splitting Tensile Strength (STS) for constructing and maintaining the road pavement because of the inevitable uncertainties in the experimental setup. In this study, a reliable hybrid intelligent model based on the integration of Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm (GOA) and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), called MARS-GOA, was developed to present new closed-form equations for CS and STS prediction of RCCP. Initially, GOA was developed to serve as a search engine of the proposed algorithm to optimise MARS control parameters by minimising the error of prediction. Statistical metrics indicate that proposed hybrid MARS-GOA outperformed ELM, M5p, and standard MARS for prediction of both the CS (CoD = 0.811, PMARE = 22.146% and U95 = 34.670) and STS (CoD = 0.816, PMARE = 16.192% and U95 = 2.725) of RCCP. The results of reliability analysis, namely Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), revealed that TCS, TTS, and uncertainty level of the used dataset play a major role in the determination of the reliability of the RCCP mix design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Department of Civil Engineering, Bozorgmehr University of Qaenat, Qaen, Iran

Department of Civil Engineering, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomein, Iran

Future Technology Research Center, College of Future, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan, ROC

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Obuda University, Budapest, Hungary

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI 325-10R-95. 2001. State-of-the-art report on roller-compacted concrete pavements, 32 pp.
2. 10.1080/10298436.2018.154782510.1080/10298436.2018.1547825 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.13810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.138 ↗
4. Aggarwal R. · International Journal of Science and Engineering · 2015 · 8 · 26
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.019 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12325410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123254 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.16810.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.168 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.047 ↗
9. 10.3390/app1011370710.3390/app10113707 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11704810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117048 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10730910.1016/j.measurement.2019.107309 ↗
12. Ashrafian, A., Taheri, A.M.J., and Haghighi, F., 2019. Modeling the slump flow of self-compacting concrete incorporating metakaolin using soft computing techniques.
13. Asteris P.G. · Computers and Concrete · 2019 · 24 · 469
14. Asteris P.G. · Computers and Concrete · 2019 · 24 · 137
15. 10.1016/j.matlet.2003.10.00710.1016/j.matlet.2003.10.007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.05410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.054 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.15610.1016/j.energy.2017.12.156 ↗
18. BIS, I. 1959. 516 Indian Standard methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India, 9.
19. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.01510.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.015 ↗
21. 10.1080/10298436.2017.136676210.1080/10298436.2017.1366762 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.047 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.16910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.169 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11700010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117000 ↗
25. 10.1214/aos/117634796310.1214/aos/1176347963 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cscm.2017.03.00410.1016/j.cscm.2017.03.004 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00521-018-3630-y10.1007/s00521-018-3630-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.11410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.114 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.31510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.315 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.21610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.216 ↗
31. 10.1007/b94608_210.1007/b94608_2 ↗
32. Haykin S. · 1999 · 14
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.11610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.116 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.12610.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12132210.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121322 ↗
36. Jekabsons G. · 2010
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.080 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11709-020-0712-610.1007/s11709-020-0712-6 ↗
39. 10.3390/app918384110.3390/app9183841 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.10910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.109 ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0247825910.1007/BF02478259 ↗
42. 10.1007/978-3-540-87536-9_1610.1007/978-3-540-87536-9_16 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10489-017-1019-810.1007/s10489-017-1019-8 ↗
44. 10.1080/10298436.2016.120574710.1080/10298436.2016.1205747 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.09810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.098 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.07510.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.075 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.06410.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.064 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.00910.1016/j.spc.2021.02.009 ↗
49. 10.9790/1684-1162040810.9790/1684-11620408 ↗
50. 10.3390/su1206233910.3390/su12062339 ↗
51. Quinlan J.R. · 1992 · 343
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.09910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.099 ↗
53. 10.12983/ijsrk-2015-p0260-026910.12983/ijsrk-2015-p0260-0269 ↗
54. Rao S.K. · IRACST-Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ) · 2015 · 5 · 202
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.004 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.00310.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.003 ↗
57. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000374110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003741 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.04610.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.046 ↗
59. 10.3390/en1208141610.3390/en12081416 ↗
60. 10.2166/nh.2017.28310.2166/nh.2017.283 ↗
61. 10.1007/s00366-015-0427-910.1007/s00366-015-0427-9 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.05.01510.1016/j.apm.2018.05.015 ↗
63. 10.1007/978-3-030-12127-3_710.1007/978-3-030-12127-3_7 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12369710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11688310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116883 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10213810.1016/j.jobe.2020.102138 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.10910.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.109 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.11710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.117 ↗
69. Taheri Amiri M.J. · Modares Civil Engineering Journal · 2019 · 19 · 196
70. 10.1680/macr.2004.56.1.3510.1680/macr.2004.56.1.35 ↗
71. 10.12989/cac.2017.19.4.43510.12989/cac.2017.19.4.435 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10410310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104103 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.00310.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.003 ↗