journal article·2026-02-06Open access

Lifespan Estimation of Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) Systems Using Weibull Modeling

Vanvisa Chutchavong, Virote Pirajnanchai, Satawat Doungpan, Witchapon Kasettakarn, Thanapol Phungtua-eng, Kanok Janchitrapongvej

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Ensuring the availability and reliability of electronic components or materials during operation necessitates conducting a sampling inspection of their lifespan. This is particularly crucial when comparing equipment or materials deployed in various areas with diverse environments, conditions, and situations. Many studies rely on one-method parameter estimation methods, which fall short in identifying the two explicit parameters of the Weibull distribution. Moreover, inaccurate parameter estimation methods impede the attainment of reliable analysis results. Consequently, this paper introduces three analytical estimation methods to determine the parameters of the Weibull distribution. The accuracy of these methods is evaluated using the mean square error (MSE). Furthermore, we utlized the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Anderson–Darling test on real datasets, confirming that the data follow a Weibull distribution. Simulation results indicate that the maximum likelihood estimate outperforms the other estimators by minimizing the MSE and yielding optimal parameters. These optimal parameters were then applied to real CCTV datasets, demonstrating a good fit and enabling assessment of CCTV lifespan through the mean time to failure, which is estimated to be 6.6 years. This holds true even when the equipment operates in environments with different conditions and situations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications · Power System Reliability and Maintenance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of IoT and Information Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand

School of Management Science, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU), Nonthaburi 11120, Thailand

Faculty of Business Administration and Information Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-Ok, Bangkok 10400, Thailand

Faculty of Digital Technology and Innovation, Southeast Bangkok University (SBU), Bangkok 10260, Thailand

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Reliability Analysis for Electronic Devices Using Beta Generalized Weibull Distribution10.1007/s40995-019-00730-4 ↗
2. Application of Bayesian Methods in Reliability Data Analyses10.1080/00224065.2014.11917951 ↗
3. A Review of the Weibull Distribution10.1080/00224065.1993.11979431 ↗
4. Chigurupati, A., Thibaux, R., and Lassar, N. (2016). Predicting hardware failure using machine learning. Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), IEEE.10.1109/RAMS.2016.7448033 ↗
5. Field-Failure Predictions Based on Failure-Time Data with Dynamic Covariate Information10.1080/00401706.2013.765324 ↗
6. Li, Z., Fu, H., and Guo, J. (2025). Reliability Assessment of a Series System with Weibull-Distributed Components Based on Zero-Failure Data. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15052869 ↗
7. Lin, M. (2011). Impact analysis on test items between IEC 60065, IEC 60950-1 and IEC 62368-1. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Product Compliance Engineering Proceedings, IEEE.10.1109/PSES.2011.6088253 ↗
8. Gómez, Y.M., Gallardo, D.I., Marchant, C., Sánchez, L., and Bourguignon, M. (2024). An In-Depth Review of the Weibull Model with a Focus on Various Parameterizations. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12010056 ↗
9. Incorporating aging failures in power system reliability evaluation10.1109/TPWRS.2002.800989 ↗
10. Failure Rate Prediction Model of Substation Equipment Based on Weibull Distribution and Time Series Analysis10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926159 ↗
11. Liu, E., Liu, R.Y., and Lim, K. (2023). Using the Weibull Accelerated Failure Time Regression Model to Predict Time to Health Events. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132413041 ↗
12. A Study on Weibull Distribution for Estimating the Parameters10.1260/030952409790291163 ↗
13. Prediction of system reliability using failure types of components based on Weibull lifetime distribution10.1007/s12206-018-0503-3 ↗
14. Yang, Y., Li, J., and Xu, C. (2022). Reliability Data Analysis of Aviation Equipment Based on Weibull Distribution. Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Frontiers Technology of Information and Computer (ICFTIC), IEEE.10.1109/ICFTIC57696.2022.10075118 ↗
15. Liu, J., Wu, Z., Wu, J., Dong, J., Zhao, Y., and Wen, D. (2017). A Weibull distribution accrual failure detector for cloud computing. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0173666 ↗
16. Repairable System Analysis Using the Discrete Weibull Distribution10.1109/TR.2023.3236156 ↗
17. The Discrete Weibull Distribution10.1109/TR.1975.5214915 ↗
18. Breneman, J.E., Sahay, C., and Lewis, E.E. (2022). Introduction to Reliability Engineering, John Wiley & Sons. [3rd ed.].
19. Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data10.1109/24.229504 ↗
20. An Explicit Formula for Reliability of 1-out-of-n Cold Standby Spare Systems with Weibull Distribution10.1142/S0218539322500292 ↗
21. A new bathtub curve model with a finite support10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.019 ↗
22. Pham, H. (2006). Two-Dimensional Failure Modeling. Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84628-288-1 ↗
23. Analysis of Instantaneous and Early Failures in Weibull Distribution10.1007/s00184-006-0050-2 ↗
24. Computation Approaches for Parameter Estimation of Weibull Distribution
25. Evaluating the Three Methods of Goodness of Fit Test for Frequency Analysis10.2991/jrarc.2015.5.3.5 ↗
26. Bootstrap Confidence Intervals of the Modified Process Capability Index for Weibull distribution10.1007/s13369-017-2562-7 ↗
27. Application of Lambda Distributions and Bootstrap analysis to the prediction of fatigue lifetime and confidence intervals10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.033 ↗
28. Justus, V.L., Rodrigues, V.B., and dos Santos Sousa, A.R. (2024). Bootstrap confidence intervals: A comparative simulation study. arXiv.
29. Life cycle assessment of repurposed waste electric and electronic equipment in comparison with original equipment10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.017 ↗