Impact of Uneven Lighting Environments on Guide Sign Visibility in Interchange Areas of Road Tunnels: A Study of Bright-to-Dark Transitions in Diverging Area
Source abstract
Abstract
To investigate the impact of “bright to dark” uneven lighting conditions on driver recognition of retroreflective guide signs in the diverging zones of underwater ramp interchanges, this study adjusts the luminance contrast between adjacent lighting segments in a tunnel to explore its effect on the recognition distance of retroreflective guide signs, thereby providing a basis for the rational design of lighting conditions in this area. Based on the driver’s safe recognition process, the minimum sight distance requirements for retroreflective guide signs were first determined under three representative operating speeds. Following the tunnel lighting design principles specified in Chinese standards, eight dark-environment luminance levels and nineteen bright-environment luminance levels were established. A total of 124 non-uniform “bright–dark” lighting combinations were then generated by varying the luminance difference in 1 cd/m2 increments. Subsequently, 24 passenger car drivers were selected to conduct dynamic recognition experiments of guide signs under the “bright–dark” lighting transition conditions in the tunnel ramp diverging zone. Recognition distances were measured using a non-contact speedometer to capture the driver’s distance to the sign. A regression model was developed to quantify the relationship between sign recognition distance, luminance difference, and dark-environment luminance. The model’s accuracy is reflected in the fact that 92.7% of the predicted values had an absolute error of less than 10 m compared to the observed values. The results show that luminance difference has a significant impact on recognition distance, which increases initially and then stabilizes as luminance difference grows. When the dark-environment luminance is below 3.5 cd/m2, the effect of luminance difference on recognition distance is more pronounced than when it exceeds 3.5 cd/m2. Based on these findings, threshold values of bright-environment luminance ensuring safe recognition distances under varying dark-environment luminance conditions are proposed. It is further recommended that, for design speeds of 100 km/h or higher, the dark-environment luminance should not be lower than 2.5 cd/m2 to maintain safe visibility of retroreflective guide signs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Impact of Light on Environment and Health · Traffic and Road Safety · Safety Warnings and Signage
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangzhou–Shenzhen Expressway Reconstruction and Expansion Authority, Guangzhou 510101, China
College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Funding
Guangzhou–Shenzhen Expressway Reconstruction and Expansion Authority · Yunnan Province Science and Technology Department
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. A Review on the Safety Studies at Entrances and Exits of Expressway Interchanges
2. Ananth, K.R., Khan, S.F., Agarwal, A., Bhatt, M.W., Alvi, A.M., and Degadwala, S. (2024). IOT and developed deep learning based road accident detection system and societal knowledge management. Next Generation Computing and Information Systems, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003466383-13 ↗
3. CIE (2004). Guide for the Lighting of Road Tunnels and Underpasses, International Commission on Illumination (CIE).
4. (2011). Roadway Lighting (Standard No. ANSI/IES RP-22-11).
5. (2024). Road Tunnel Lighting (Standard No. CEN/TR 14380:2024).
6. International Lighting Skommission (2010). Lighting of Roads for Motor and Pedestrian Traffic: Technical Report, CIE Central Bureau. [2nd ed.]. CIE Publications.
7. Introduction on the Revising of Standard for Lighting Design of Urban Road
8. (2014). Guidelines for Design of Lighting of Highway Tunnels (Standard No. JTG/T D70/2-01-2014).
9. (2022). Traffic Signs and Markings: Part 2: Traffic Signs (Standard No. GB 5768.2-2022).
10. Perception Under Road Lighting Conditions with Complex Surroundings10.2150/jlve.19.2_5 ↗
11. Research on Traffic Sign Discernible Visual Range under Backlighting Condition
12. Assessment of Drivers’ Comprehension of Traffic Signs Based on Their Traffic, Personal, and Social Characteristics10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00006-2 ↗
13. Studying the Effects of Freeway Alignment, Traffic Flow, and Sign Information on Subjective Driving Workload and Performance10.1177/1687814019853925 ↗
14. Driving Simulator Study of the Comparative Effectiveness of Monolingual and Bilingual Guide Signs on Chinese Highways10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.008 ↗
15. Influence of Drivers’ Comprehension of Posted Signs on Their Safety-Related Characteristics10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00084-6 ↗
16. Choocharukul, K. (2015, January 11–15). An Experimental Analysis of Factors Affecting Nighttime Visibility of Traffic Signs. Proceedings of the TRB 2015 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
17. Reliability of Variable Message Signs Information: A Field Experiment Study in Chongqing10.1016/j.trf.2021.11.002 ↗
18. Study on the Recognition Reaction Time of Directional Signs Considering Driver Characteristics
19. Comparative Analysis of the Forms of Directional Signs at Interchange Exits Based on Visual Cognition Characteristics
20. Study on the Safety Distance of the Cooperative Setting of Directional Signs and Pavement Characters
21. Study on the Visual Cognition Effects of Different Areas of the Layout of Directional Signs Based on Visual Cognition Characteristics
22. Comparative Analysis of the Visual Effects Between the Semi-Transparent LED Guide Signs and the Retro-Reflective Guide Ones
23. Ergonomic Analysis of the Setting of Traffic Signs at Highway Intersections
24. Yang, J.L., and Liu, H.X. (1999). Guidelines for the Application of Road Traffic Signs and Markings, China Standards Press.
25. Roess, R.P., Prassas, E.S., and Mashane, W.R. (2004). Traffic Engineering, Pearson Education.
26. Study on the Variation Law of the Driver’s Visual Field Contrast under the Tunnel Light Environment and Its Influence on Driving Safety
27. (2024). Automotive Road Lighting Devices (Standard No. GB 4599-2024).
28. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research, Third Edition10.1080/24754269.2017.1398000 ↗