Evaluation of machine learning approach for base and subgrade layer temperature prediction at various depths in the presence of insulation layers
Source abstract
Abstract
To protect pavement in cold regions, insulation layers have been used in pavement construction. The insulation layer blocks the heat exchange, resulting in different pavement temperature distributions at different layers. Pavements in cold regions are subject to frost heave, thaw weakening, and freeze–thaw cycling, and the moisture content of unbound materials is affected by the temperature of the pavement. Therefore, the base and subgrade temperature can affect the pavement performance, and the insulation layer influences the performance of the pavement. This work aims to demonstrate the capability of the machine learning method to predict the pavement temperature of the base and subgrade layers in the presence of insulation layers. Pavement temperature measured from sensors embedded in the pavement at the IRRF test road and environmental factors collected from a weather station were used to train machine learning models. The results obtained from machine learning models indicated that the air temperature and day of the year were the most robust input prediction parameters at each depth. Machine learning models outperformed the existing model and proved that it could be a method to improve pavement temperature prediction with insulation layers, especially when the base layer temperature is below 0°C.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO, 2008. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. 10.3390/app1109379410.3390/app11093794 ↗
3. 10.3141/2456-1010.3141/2456-10 ↗
4. 10.1139/cjce-2015-055410.1139/cjce-2015-0554 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.05.00410.1016/j.ijprt.2017.05.004 ↗
6. Bai, B.C., et al., 2015. Thermal properties of asphalt mixtures modified with conductive fillers. Journal of Nanomaterials, 16 (1), 255.
7. 10.3141/1730-1010.3141/1730-10 ↗
8. Bonaccorso, G, 2018. Machine learning algorithms: popular algorithms for data science and machine learning. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd.
9. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11375510.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113755 ↗
10. 10.1139/t04-08110.1139/t04-081 ↗
11. 10.1017/CBO978051180138910.1017/CBO9780511801389 ↗
12. Doré G. et al. 2005. Estimation of the relationships of road deterioration to traffic and weather in Canada. Transport Canada Final Report.
13. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.11.01310.1016/j.coldregions.2015.11.013 ↗
14. Fredlund, D.G., Bergan, A.T., and Wong, P.K, 1977. Relation between resilient modulus and stress conditions for cohesive subgrade soils. Transportation Research Record, 642, 73–81.
15. 10.3141/2433-0510.3141/2433-05 ↗
16. 10.3141/2579-1010.3141/2579-10 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-319-42797-3_5410.1007/978-3-319-42797-3_54 ↗
18. Hayden, R.L., and Swanson, H.N, 1972. Styrofoam highway insulation on Colorado Mountain passes. Denver: Colorado Division of Highways.
19. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2004.03.00110.1016/j.coldregions.2004.03.001 ↗
20. Heydinger A. 2003. Monitoring seasonal instrumentation and modeling climatic effects on pavement at the Ohio/SHRP test road. Report No. FHWA/OH-2003/018. U.S. Department of Transportation.
21. 10.1177/0361198121100357210.1177/03611981211003572 ↗
22. 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-101010.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1010 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00101-810.1016/S0304-3894(03)00101-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.14510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.145 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.02610.1016/j.compind.2018.03.026 ↗
26. 10.1061/9780784412473.03710.1061/9780784412473.037 ↗
27. 10.1177/036119810519190011110.1177/0361198105191900111 ↗
28. Mohammed S.A. and Karim M.R. 2017 June. Application of coal bottom ash as aggregate replacement in highway embankment acoustic absorbing wall and asphalt mixtures. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 5–6 April 2017. Kuala Lumpur Malaysia: IOP Publishing University of Malaya.10.1088/1757-899X/210/1/012025 ↗
29. 10.1007/s42947-021-00023-310.1007/s42947-021-00023-3 ↗
30. Nassiri S. Bayat A. and Skirrow R. 2013. Integrated Road Research Facility (IRRF): An Alberta Research Initiative. In: 2013 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada-Transportation: Better-Faster-Safer 22–25 September 2013 Winnipeg 1–18.
31. Penner, E, 1967. Experimental pavement structures insulated with a polyurethane and extruded polystyrene foam. Physics of Snow and Ice: Proceedings, 1 (2), 1311–1322.
32. Qiu X et al. 2020. August. Surface temperature prediction of asphalt pavement based on APRIORI-GBDT. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development 2020. Reston VA: American Society of Civil Engineers 200-212.10.1061/9780784483183.020 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.00110.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.001 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:1(28)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:1(28) ↗
35. Smith B. S. 2006. Design and construction of pavements in cold regions: state of the practice. Thesis (Master). Brigham Young University.
36. Tighe S.L. et al. 2006. Climate impacts and adaptations on roads in northern Canada. Presented at Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting 22-26 January Washington DC.
37. Zach 2021. RMSE vs. R-squared: which metric should you use? [Online] statology study. Available from: https://www.statology.org/rmse-vs-r-squared/ [Accessed 1 Dec 2021].
38. 10.1007/s13369-020-04398-610.1007/s13369-020-04398-6 ↗